feat: Expose gitops-pusher result as step outputs (e.g. for PR comments)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 74/100
Línea de trabajo
Start in action.yml, especially the Gitops pusher step and the action's existing outputs and execution flow. Exercise the action: test path with a successful and failing policy check, then verify the declared outcome, output, and changed values are available to later steps while failures still produce a non-zero status.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
Expose the result of gitops-pusher as step outputs so a later step in the workflow can report it, for example by posting a comment on the pull request.
Motivation
When action: test runs on a pull request, the only place to see why it failed is the job log. For example:
test(s) failed
For user tag:example:
Errors found:
- [acl test error]: address "tag:server:22" (protocol "tcp"): want: Drop, got: Accept
exit status 1
It would be much easier to review policy changes if that message could be posted to the PR automatically. Right now the action gives a later step nothing to work with:
- It defines no
outputs, so later steps can't read the result or the error text. - The output from
gitops-pusheronly goes to the job log.
To get a PR comment today, I had to stop using the action for PR checks and copy what it does into my own workflow: set up Go, pin the same gitops-pusher commit, run it with | tee, and fetch the live policy from the API myself. I'd rather keep using the action and keep getting its updates.
Proposed change
Add outputs to the action, for example:
| Output | Description |
|---|---|
outcome |
success or failure from gitops-pusher |
output |
Everything gitops-pusher printed (stdout and stderr), or at least the error part |
changed |
true if the local policy differs from the live policy (control vs. local ETag) |
A diff between the live policy and the local file would also be helpful as an output, so reviewers can see exactly what merging will change. If that doesn't fit this action, the three outputs above cover the main need.
With these outputs, a workflow could do this:
- name: Test ACL
id: test-acl
uses: tailscale/gitops-acl-action@v1
continue-on-error: true
with:
oauth-client-id: ${{ secrets.TS_OAUTH_ID }}
oauth-secret: ${{ secrets.TS_OAUTH_SECRET }}
tailnet: ${{ secrets.TS_TAILNET }}
action: test
- name: Comment on PR
if: always() && github.event_name == 'pull_request'
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
OUTCOME: ${{ steps.test-acl.outputs.outcome }}
OUTPUT: ${{ steps.test-acl.outputs.output }}
run: |
# build a comment from $OUTCOME / $OUTPUT and post it with `gh pr comment`
Implementation notes
Changes to the Gitops pusher step in action.yml:
- Run
gitops-pusherwith2>&1 | teeso its output still appears in the log. - Keep its exit code, then write the output to
$GITHUB_OUTPUTusing the multiline heredoc syntax. - Declare the new values under
outputs:inaction.yml.
The step should still exit non-zero when gitops-pusher fails, so existing workflows behave the same.
Optionally, the action could write the same output to $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY. That would show failures on the run summary page with no extra workflow setup.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Sin datos de lenguaje
- Estrellas
- 153
- Forks
- 44
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de tailscale/gitops-acl-action
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
tailscale/gitops-acl-action#81 · 1 comentario ·
-
Add Workload Identity Federation ExampleQuizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 64/100
tailscale/gitops-acl-action#62 · 4 comentarios · 5 reacciones ·
-
README.md recommends an insecure default configurationQuizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
tailscale/gitops-acl-action#32 · 4 comentarios · 6 reacciones ·
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 30/100
Todos los issues de tailscale/gitops-acl-action
Issues similares
-
who:julian
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
julian-heidt/jellyfin-media-stack#24 · 1 comentario ·
-
area/ci
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:build bug effort:low P5 source:agent
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement forward/review service/compute-interconnect
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#30702 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
external
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día