C tests accept a wrong next pointer on the last node in Org Chart Row Navigation
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
@winter77777 ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 19/10/2026.
Evaluación
Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.
Descripción
Observed behavior
In Org Chart Row Navigation (Populating Next Right Pointers in Each Node II), the C tests accept a solution whose last next pointer is wrong.
The solution below links each row correctly, then points the last node of the bottom row back to the first node of that row. That node should point to NULL. In C it passes 5/5. The same code in C++ passes 1/5, and every failing case shows "next pointers do not match the tree level order." Java, JavaScript and Python give the same 1/5 with the same message.
static struct Node* rows[128];
struct Node* linkRowNeighbors(struct Node* root) {
int head = 0, tail = 0;
if (root) rows[tail++] = root;
while (head < tail) {
int end = tail;
for (int i = head; i < end; i++) {
rows[i]->next = i + 1 < end ? rows[i + 1] : NULL;
if (rows[i]->left) rows[tail++] = rows[i]->left;
if (rows[i]->right) rows[tail++] = rows[i]->right;
}
if (tail == end) rows[end - 1]->next = rows[head];
head = end;
}
return root;
}
A wrong next earlier in the tree is not caught cleanly either. If the root's next points to itself, C reports [[1]] for "sparse final level" with no message, so the candidate cannot tell what went wrong.
Expected behavior
C fails a wrong next pointer with "next pointers do not match the tree level order.", like the other four languages. A correct solution still passes 5/5.
Reproduction
- Open Org Chart Row Navigation and select C.
- Paste the solution above and run tests. All 5 cases pass.
- Switch to C++, paste the same logic written with
vector<Node*>, and run tests. 4 cases fail with the message above.
CodeTrial version
codetrial 0.1.0 (4faffce)
Environment
OS: Windows 11
Browser: Chromium 155.0.8059.80
Language: C (C++, Java, JavaScript and Python 3 checked for comparison)
Interview loop: Coding
Problem: Org Chart Row Navigation (LeetCode 117)
REACTO or STAR step: Test
Reconnect: None
Sanitized evidence
C, with the solution above:
5/5 test cases passed
OK sparse final level
OK empty tree
OK single node
OK missing middle children
OK one child
C++, with the same logic:
1/5 test cases passed
FAIL sparse final level
input [[1,2,3,4,5,null,7]]
next pointers do not match the tree level order.
OK empty tree
FAIL single node
input [[1]]
next pointers do not match the tree level order.
FAIL missing middle children
input [[1,2,3,null,5,null,7]]
next pointers do not match the tree level order.
FAIL one child
input [[1,2]]
next pointers do not match the tree level order.
Initial analysis at 4faffce:
json_next_tree in the C harness (web/compiler-explorer.js:383 at 4faffce) prints each value first and checks that node's next after. On a mismatch it closes the brackets and returns. The output is then a shorter list that still parses, and if the bad pointer is on the last node, it matches the expected answer exactly.
The C++ and Java harnesses (nextTreeToJson at line 543, nextTreeJson at line 712) and the JavaScript and Python runners (web/runners.js:604, :924) check every pointer and report the message instead of a value.
Fix: check all next pointers before printing, and print the message as a JSON string on a mismatch. json_random_list already reports its error this way in C. I will add a C toolchain test in tests/browser/compiler-explorer.test.js that fails before the fix, and send a pull request.
Public data confirmation
- I removed credentials, session tokens, candidate recordings, and personal interview content from this public report.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 160
- Forks
- 64
- Merge medio
- 1 d 10 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 135
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de sysprog21/codetrial
-
Audio output can be confirmed without playing a test soundPosiblemente ocupada @ChenYingHan1121 la tomó hace 1 día. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
sysprog21/codetrial#359 · 3 comentarios · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Add a Copy code button to the final reportPosiblemente ocupada @yansawu la tomó hace 1 día. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 80/100
sysprog21/codetrial#318 · 5 comentarios · 2 reacciones · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
"Let me think about it for a moment" does not start a thinking holdPosiblemente ocupada @PeteChiang1211 la tomó hoy. Abierto
sysprog21/codetrial#369 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
sysprog21/codetrial#368 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Switching programming languages clears editor undo historyPosiblemente ocupada @Chingyong0905 la tomó hoy. Abierto
sysprog21/codetrial#365 · 1 comentario · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de sysprog21/codetrial
Issues similares
-
documentation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
charles-hood/DiagramCraft#73 ·
-
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
ontologyportal/sigma-rs#200 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
chipsalliance/caliptra-sw#4311 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
`image_generation`: `max_retries` is ignored for OpenAI-compatible providers (always 2 retries)Posiblemente ocupada @ericz7900 la tomó hoy. Abiertollm translation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 77/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día