Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Middleware exceptions escape the generated handleRequest and bypass configureServerErrors

Abierto
#382 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
35/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bien especificado
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
typescript, vite
Área
api, backend

Línea de trabajo

Start by reading src/ssr/index.ts around lines 1433-1453 and compare the server-function endpoint's handling of thrown Responses. Reproduce the production /boom case, then inspect src/node-entry/index.ts and the configureServerErrors path. Done means production middleware failures follow the stated response and error-policy behavior while dev retains its current overlay behavior.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Problem

In Start mode, the generated handleRequest runs the start.middleware chain without a catch:

https://github.com/solidjs/solid-vite-plugin/blob/52d93ebcf2cd41d1254cbf8ab32f51b0b0b11d85/src/ssr/index.ts#L1433-L1453

When a middleware throws or rejects in a production build, the exception leaves handleRequest and each host deals with it in its own way:

  • Nitro (h3) logs the original error with console.error and answers 500 with {"error":true,"status":500,"unhandled":true} as JSON. The headers and cookies the chain already wrote to the response stub are lost.
  • start.node logs it and answers a plain-text 500 (src/node-entry/index.ts#L154-L161).
  • The examples/start-ssr server sends e.message back to the client (examples/start-ssr/server.js#L78-L81).

Two consequences go beyond the inconsistent response:

  1. The hook registered with configureServerErrors({ onError }) never sees these failures, although its docs describe it as seeing "the failure that fails a request". Apps that rely on it to keep original errors out of logs, or to forward them to an APM (as start.instrument in #365 suggests), lose that for middleware, API handlers mounted in middleware, and start.setup / start.renderMode failures.
  2. A thrown control response turns into a 500. return redirect('/login') from a middleware works, but throw redirect('/login') reaches h3 as a non-Error rejection and becomes an unhandled 500. The server-function endpoint, served by the same handler, already treats a thrown Response as the response.
Reproduction

With @solidjs/vite-plugin 3.0.0-next.46, @solidjs/web 2.0.0-rc.11 and Nitro 3 beta:

// the module passed to start.middleware
export default async function middleware(request: Request, next: () => Promise<Response>) {
  if (new URL(request.url).pathname === '/boom') throw new Error('token=abc123')
  return next()
}

Build for production, serve it and request /boom: the response is Nitro's JSON 500, the server log shows Error: token=abc123 with its stack, and a hook registered with configureServerErrors is not called.

Expected

In production builds, the generated handler contains request failures the way the server-function endpoint does:

  • a thrown Response (except Response.error()) or response envelope becomes the response;
  • anything else goes through the configured server error policy and yields a generic 500 that still carries the stub's headers and cookies;
  • dev keeps the current behavior, so the Vite overlay still shows the original error.
Notes
  • There is no public API today to run a value through the configured policy outside a render, so the handler would have to call the hook registered under the configureServerErrors symbol. A public entry point in @solidjs/web for request failures, with its own kind in ServerErrorSite, would remove that coupling.
  • A later step could render the app's error boundary when the chain fails before the page render, so a failed navigation gets an HTML error page instead of an empty 500. Apps can do that in userland today, but it depends on the single-render rule and on excluding the server-function endpoint.
  • Related: #328, since a deploy adapter would benefit from a handler that does not reject for application failures.

I'll follow up with a PR for the containment part.

Lenguaje dominante
TypeScript
Estrellas
522
Forks
72
Merge medio
21 h 42 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
35

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de solidjs/solid-vite-plugin

Todos los issues de solidjs/solid-vite-plugin

Issues similares

Más issues de TypeScript

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.