Update .NET target from net8.0 to net10.0
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- #172 de @imnasnainaec — cerrado sin fusionar
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 52/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- csharp, github-actions
- Área
- build-system, ci-cd, testing
Línea de trabajo
Primero determina si se debe reemplazar net8.0 o añadir net10.0 junto a él, utilizando la encuesta a los consumidores de los comentarios. Después actualiza los archivos de proyecto indicados y .github/workflows/CI-CD.yml, e inspecciona .github/workflows/codeql.yml, GitVersion.yml y Directory.Build.props para detectar problemas de compatibilidad. Ejecuta la compilación de la solución y los comandos de prueba de Windows/Linux; después verifica SampleApp y el contenido y la versión del paquete generado.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
.NET 8 reaches end of support on 2026-11-10. .NET 10 is the current LTS (supported through
November 2028). We need net10.0/net10.0-windows coverage for our modern target frameworks.
This assumes #161 has landed, so the .NET Framework targets are already net462;net48 and
System.Resources.Extensions / SIL.ReleaseTasks / System.ServiceModel.* are already on
current versions. The .NET Framework and netstandard2.0 targets are unaffected by this issue.
Decision needed first
Do we replace net8.0 or add net10.0 alongside it? Both are on the table; see the consumer
survey in the comments for what each costs downstream.
- Replace: simplest, but it is a breaking change —
L10NSharp.Windows.Forms,L10NSharp.CheckOrFixXliffandL10NSharp.ExtractXliffwould no
longer have assets that apply to anet8.0/net9.0consumer. Requires+semver:major
(see the Semantic Versioning section of the README). - Add alongside (
net8.0;net10.0): non-breaking (+semver:minor), at the cost of a longer
build matrix, until .NET 8 goes out of support in November 2026.
Note that the L10NSharp core package itself targets netstandard2.0 (not net8.0), so it is
unaffected either way; only the three packages listed above and the test/sample projects carry a
net8.0* TFM.
Changes required
The sites are the same either way — the decision above only settles whether each net8.0* TFM is
replaced by its net10.0* counterpart or joined by it.
Target frameworks:
-
src/CheckOrFixXliff/CheckOrFixXliff.csproj:5—$(TargetFrameworks);net8.0→net10.0 -
src/ExtractXliff/ExtractXliff.csproj:5—$(TargetFrameworks);net8.0→net10.0 -
src/L10NSharp.Tests/L10NSharp.Tests.csproj:3—$(TargetFrameworks);net8.0→net10.0 -
src/L10NSharp.Windows.Forms/L10NSharp.Windows.Forms.csproj:4—net8.0-windows→net10.0-windows -
src/L10NSharp.Windows.Forms/L10NSharp.Windows.Forms.csproj:15— the
'$(TargetFramework)' == 'net8.0-windows'condition guarding theSystem.ServiceModel.*
package references -
src/L10NSharp.Windows.Forms.Tests/L10NSharp.Windows.Forms.Tests.csproj:3—net8.0-windows→net10.0-windows -
src/SampleApp/SampleApp.csproj:3—net8.0-windows→net10.0-windows
CI:
-
.github/workflows/CI-CD.yml:37—dotnet-version: 8.0.x→10.0.x -
.github/workflows/CI-CD.yml:51— the Linux test step's--framework net8.0→net10.0.
This is the only step that runs on Ubuntu, so it is our sole cross-platform coverage; it must
keep working. - Confirm the
windows-latestandubuntu-latestrunner images ship (orsetup-dotnet
installs) a .NET 10 SDK, and thatAutobuildin.github/workflows/codeql.ymlstill resolves
an SDK that can build the new TFMs.
Docs:
-
CHANGELOG.mdentry under[Unreleased](### Changed, marked BREAKING CHANGE if we drop
net8.0), and the+semver:major(or:minor) marker on the commit.
Likely follow-on work / risks
These are the parts most likely to turn a one-line TFM bump into real work:
- GitVersion.MsBuild 5.11.1 (all packable projects) predates the .NET 10 SDK and may not load
under it. Moving to GitVersion 6.x means migratingGitVersion.yml, which still uses the v5
schema (mode: ContinuousDeployment,tag:on each branch — renamed tolabel:in v6, with
changedContinuousDeploymentsemantics). Getting version numbers wrong here affects what gets
published to nuget.org, so this deserves care. - Test tooling is from 2022:
Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.4.0,NUnit3.13.3,
NUnit3TestAdapter4.3.2. These are likely to need bumping to run on a .NET 10 SDK / VSTest.
Note that.github/workflows/CI-CD.ymlinvokesdotnet testagainst pre-built DLLs
(--no-build output\Release\net462\*Tests.dll), so adapter/runner changes can break CI in ways
a localdotnet testwill not show. System.ServiceModel.Http/System.ServiceModel.Primitives8.1.2 — check for a version
aligned with .NET 10 and re-verify theBingTranslator/ generated WCF proxy code, which #161
already had to adjust for API removals. (Related: #163 — the Bing API itself is retired, so this
code may be on its way out regardless.)Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub1.1.1 is redundant on .NET 8+ SDKs (SourceLink is built in).
Harmless, but a good opportunity to drop it if it causes friction.LangVersionis pinned to8.0inDirectory.Build.propsfor all TFMs. Not required to
change, but if we want newer C# on the modern target only, this is where it would happen.
Out of scope unless something forces it.
Verification
-
dotnet build L10NSharp.slnclean acrossnet462,net48,netstandard2.0,net10.0,
net10.0-windows(plusnet8.0*if retained) -
dotnet testpasses on Windows (all TFMs) and on Linux (--framework net10.0) -
SampleApp.exelaunches fornet462,net48, andnet10.0-windows - Generated
.nupkgs contain the expectedlib/folders and the version number is what
GitVersion produced before the change (i.e. no accidental version regression)
Drafted by Claude Opus 5 (1M context) (claude-opus-5[1m]) via Claude Code.
- Lenguaje dominante
- C#
- Estrellas
- 3
- Forks
- 10
- Merge medio
- 2 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 2
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de sillsdev/l10nsharp
-
api change bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
enhancement
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
bug
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
-
bug
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
Todos los issues de sillsdev/l10nsharp
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
enhancement P3 performance
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
thomhurst/TUnit#7380 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
-
documentation trivial
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
PCL-Community/PCL-CE#3767 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día