Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Authenticated Encryption should check for tag length

Abierto
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#63 17 comentarios 4 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
30/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Stack tecnológico
c, ruby
Área
cryptography, security

Línea de trabajo

Comienza rastreando el comportamiento existente de Cipher#auth_tag y #final para AES-GCM, incluido cómo se genera actualmente CipherError. Revisa el comportamiento solicitado de auth_tag_len y los requisitos de documentación; después, compara las rutas de cifrado y descifrado. El trabajo estará terminado cuando la propuesta de API esté resuelta, las longitudes de tag se comprueben según lo especificado y el comportamiento relevante esté documentado y cubierto por tests.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

The current API for using ciphers with Authenticated Encryption (currently only AES-GCM) is rather misleading and quickly leads to subtle bugs related to the length of auth_tag.

In particular, the current implementation will not check for the length of the auth_tag. Because GCM mode allows arbitrary sizes of the auth_tag up to 128 bytes, only a single byte needs to be supplied to make the authentication pass. This means that an attacker needs at most 256 attempts in order to forge a valid auth_tag.

data = 'secret'

cipher = OpenSSL::Cipher.new('aes-128-gcm')
cipher.encrypt
key = cipher.random_key
iv = cipher.random_iv
cipher.auth_data = 'auth_data'
ciphertext = cipher.update(data) + cipher.final
auth_tag = cipher.auth_tag

auth_tag = auth_tag[0] # single byte is sufficient

cipher = OpenSSL::Cipher.new('aes-128-gcm')
cipher.decrypt
cipher.key = key
cipher.iv = iv
cipher.auth_tag = auth_tag
cipher.auth_data = 'auth_data'
data = cipher.update(ciphertext) + cipher.final

# NO error raised

Currently, the only way to prevent such attacks is to manually assert the correct auth_tag length when decrypting/authenticating.

raise 'incorrect auth_tag length' unless auth_tag.length == 16

I suggest the following improvements:

Documentation should mention the importance of manually checking auth_tag length

This can/should be done immediately even if the API should not change.

Authentication tag length should be an input parameter to the cipher

To improve the usability of the API and unburden users from performing additional manual checks without compromising security, I suggest to add an auth_tag_len accessor. This can be used to determine the size of the auth_tag both when generating and when authenticating the auth_tag. The default value should be 16 bytes (see below).

#auth_tag should use auth_tag_len to determine the output length

During encryption:

If no parameter is given, #auth_tag should return an authentication tag according to the length configured in auth_tag_len.

If a length parameter is given, #auth_tag should use the supplied parameter to determine the length of the authentication tag. Although this parameter is not as useful any more it should be kept for backwards compatibility. Maybe it should be deprecated.

Currently the API supports different tag lengths by passing the length parameter to #auth_tag. This currently defaults to 16 bytes, which should be the default value for auth_tag_len in order to keep backwards compatibility.

#final should use auth_tag_len to assert the correct length of the auth_tag

During decryption:

auth_tag_len should be used to assert that the supplied auth_tag has the correct length. The big difference to the existing API lies here, because users need to actively change the value of auth_tag_len in order to allow shorter tags.

When the check fails, an OpenSSL::Cipher::CipherError should be raised. The same type of error is already raised when authentication fails, so existing users should be fine without having to touch their error handling. A descriptive error message should be helpful. In order to distinguish between such errors and "actual" verification errors, we could also add a descriptive message for the latter.

I'd be happy to implement these changes, but I wanted to discuss them first.

For reference: This issue was copied over from the Ruby Issue Tracker https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12582

Lenguaje dominante
C
Estrellas
276
Forks
200
Merge medio
15 h 27 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
7

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de ruby/openssl

Todos los issues de ruby/openssl

Issues similares

Más issues de C

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.