Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

2.8.1: ExecJS.compile consistently exits 1 in one environment and 0 elsewhere.

Abierto
#105 4 comentarios 2 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
35/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Stack tecnológico
node.js, ruby
Área
tooling

Línea de trabajo

Start with the reproduction script and the ExecJS entry points in lib/execjs/module.rb, runtime.rb, and external_runtime.rb, then compare the behavior introduced by a6abf130c721ca6ec05cfc7ed79cf2e87a7dcc35 with 2.8.0. Reproduce the exit-status difference using Node 12.21.0 in the affected RHEL environment and verify that compilation succeeds with exit code 0 without regressing the hanging-process fix.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

I have a few environments I'm testing execjs's compile in combination with uglifier and have a strange problem that happens consistently in one environment but not elsewhere. I have minimized the problem to this commit: a6abf130c721ca6ec05cfc7ed79cf2e87a7dcc35 released in 2.8.1 and can reliably recreate it with this script:

require 'bundler/inline'

gemfile do
  source 'http://rubygems.org'
  gem 'execjs',   "=2.8.1"
  gem 'uglifier', "=3.0.4"
end

require 'uglifier'
puts "Uglifier: #{Uglifier::VERSION}"
puts "ExecJS: #{ExecJS::VERSION}"

puts "Running test..."
ExecJS.compile(File.read(Uglifier::SourceMapPath)); nil
puts $?

In the bad environment, I'm seeing that this exits with 'ok' but with exit code 1:

Uglifier: 3.0.4
ExecJS: 2.8.1
Running test...
Traceback (most recent call last):

        7: from XXX/gems/execjs-2.8.1/lib/execjs/module.rb:27:in `compile'
        6: from XXX/gems/execjs-2.8.1/lib/execjs/runtime.rb:72:in `compile'
        5: from XXX/gems/execjs-2.8.1/lib/execjs/runtime.rb:72:in `new'
        4: from XXX/gems/execjs-2.8.1/lib/execjs/external_runtime.rb:14:in `initialize'
        3: from XXX/gems/execjs-2.8.1/lib/execjs/external_runtime.rb:39:in `exec'
        2: from XXX/gems/execjs-2.8.1/lib/execjs/external_runtime.rb:219:in `exec_runtime'
        1: from (execjs):1

ExecJS::RuntimeError (["ok"])
pid 134 exit 1

When I try to recreate this issue in other environments with 2.8.1, it exits correctly with exit code 0.

I determined it was this change: a6abf130c721ca6ec05cfc7ed79cf2e87a7dcc35 by testing this bad environment with execjs 2.8.0 and 2.7.0 without changing anything else and they both exit with exit code 0 as expected:

Uglifier: 3.0.4
ExecJS: 2.7.0
Running test...
pid 364 exit 0
Uglifier: 3.0.4
ExecJS: 2.8.0
Running test...
pid 249 exit 0

I'm using node 12.21.0 and it works on OSX and RHEL 8.4 and debian. The bad environment is also RHEL 8.4 based with a very similar setup as the working one.

It looks like we're explicitly calling process.exit() to avoid it hanging: c5fd11d7b0338ae7779f69a293964f3440ee3787. The docs say:

Rather than calling process.exit() directly, the code should set the process.exitCode and allow the process to exit naturally by avoiding scheduling any additional work for the event loop

The commit for 2.8.1 is such a minor change. I don't know if the process isn't gracefully terminating or some other low level error is happening but I cannot get more information to determine why this exits 1, which in turn makes execjs believe it failed. I've tried getting more output from node but the following options didn't give me anything extra:

--report-uncaught-exception
--report-on-fatalerror

Do you have any ideas on things I can try? Thanks!

Lenguaje dominante
Ruby
Estrellas
578
Forks
286
Métricas de merge de PR
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de rails/execjs

Todos los issues de rails/execjs

Issues similares

Más issues de Ruby

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.