Suggestion for project structure/setup improvements

Abierto
#355 1 comentario 1 reacción 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
25/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Stack tecnológico
python

Línea de trabajo

No files, tests, or entry points are named. Review the current dependency, formatting, test automation, hook, lint, CI, and contribution setup, then define a focused scope and verify that development setup and documented test commands work consistently across the supported Python versions.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

kind/enhancement

I'd like to suggest an (in my opinion) improvement of the project structure/setup and the involved tooling to ease contributions and maintenance.

  1. Use Poetry for dependency management and packaging. Poetry has a number of advantages over plain pip including proper dependency resolution, built-in dependency locking, specification of dev-dependencies, a unified CLI for dependency and package management, virtual env management, etc. Poetry is used in some popular projects including, e.g., isort, diagrams, Rasa among others. I've been using Poetry since v0.12 and believe that it's the best tool available at this point for managing Python projects.
  2. Use code formatters: Black for most of the code and isort for imports. Those two are the de-facto standard code formatters for Python.
  3. Use Tox for test automation, e.g. for running the test suite against all officially supported Python versions (and if applicable against different versions of specific dependencies).
  4. Use pre-commit to run code formatters and linters before a commit to avoid erroneous commits.
  5. Optionally replace Flake8 by Pylint for more sophisticated linting. This is a matter of taste, I personally like Pylint a lot.
  6. Write a contribution guide on how to set up a development environment, how to run the test suite (against multiple Python versions), etc.

If done well, this setup has a single source of truth for all (dev-)dependencies and tool configurations for local development environments, IDEs, pre-commit hooks and CI jobs, integrates with common IDEs like VS Code out of the box (e.g. formatters can be applied when saving a file), and offers reproducible environments and builds for all contributors. I have numerous private projects set up this way, the DX is very smooth.

What do you think? I'd be happy to send a PR.

Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
368
Forks
140
Métricas de merge de PR
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de python-openapi/openapi-core

Todos los issues de python-openapi/openapi-core

Issues similares

Más issues de Python

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.