Periodically find and queue missing compiler compatibility checks
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 22/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Área
- backend
Línea de trabajo
This is design work, so start by reading the linked #800, #801 and #803 to see what those changes already cover. The issue names no files: look for where the publish job queues compiler matrix jobs and where the existing job queue is written. Done means a design decision on the stateless sweep, the queue-insertion rule, and whether scheduling moves outside the publish job's success boundary, agreed with maintainers before any code is written.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
A package can finish publishing, but some of its compiler compatibility checks may never get queued. For example, the server might time out or restart while finding the checks to run. The package is available to users, but its list of supported compilers can remain incomplete indefinitely.
This happened with [email protected] in #800.
#801 makes follow-up scheduling faster and inserts jobs one at a time. That saves jobs already queued before an interruption, but it cannot recover checks it never reached. #803 improves solver performance, but faster solving alone does not repair missing checks.
So the basic problem remains: how do we detect and fix the unavoidable case where a compiler matrix job might not get queued for a published package? And how do we do it without introducing new state?
I think we can accomplish this with a regular, stateless sweep over the registry. The basic idea is to run a small repair command on a regular interval, for example through a systemd timer. Each run starts fresh and asks: Which published package versions still need compiler checks?
For each published package version and each supported compiler:
- If the package metadata already lists that exact compiler, skip it.
- If a matrix job already exists for that package version and compiler, skip it.
- Otherwise, try to find dependency versions that allow a build with that compiler.
- If a build plan is found, immediately insert a matrix job into the existing queue.
- If no plan is found, leave it alone and try again on a later sweep. A dependency may gain compiler support in the meantime.
The normal server executor still runs the compilation jobs and updates package metadata after successful compilation. The repair command does not compile packages or write compatibility metadata itself.
This survives interruptions itself. As a concrete example, suppose a sweep finds 100 missing checks and stops after queuing 40. The next sweep starts over, skips those 40 existing jobs, and finds the remaining checks. We do not need to remember where the previous sweep stopped.
This also finds old gaps, not just gaps caused by the latest publication or compiler release. It should examine all currently published versions, not only the newest version of each package.
The goal is eventual repair: as sweeps and compilation jobs complete, missing compatibility results are filled in wherever a build succeeds. A missing compiler entry is not proof that the package cannot compile with it, and a solved build plan is not proof of compatibility until compilation succeeds.
Side note: separating queueing from publication success
If publication finishes successfully, a later timeout while queuing compatibility checks currently makes the publish job fail. This is kind of misleading though; the compiler matrix is an eventually-correct best-effort thing, not a requirement for publishing. Compatibility scheduling should be outside the publication job's success/failure boundary and timeout. The periodic sweep can take responsibility for discovering that follow-up work.
The same principle applies to matrix jobs: once compilation succeeds and the compatibility metadata is successfully written/pushed, a later failure to schedule dependant checks should not turn that successful check into a failed job.
- Lenguaje dominante
- PureScript
- Estrellas
- 95
- Forks
- 79
- Merge medio
- 16 h 13 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 14
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de purescript/registry-dev
-
A failed publish job permanently blocks retrying the same package versionPosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
purescript/registry-dev#793 · 5 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Implement search and versioned Prim docs for the new PursuitQuizá libre de nuevo @thomashoneyman la tomó hace 109 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abiertopursuit
purescript/registry-dev#790 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Migrate Pursuit application to the monorepoQuizá libre de nuevo @thomashoneyman la tomó hace 109 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abiertopursuit
purescript/registry-dev#789 · 1 comentario · 1 reacción · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Complete support for monorepos / subdir key and non-GitHub locationsQuizá libre de nuevo @thomashoneyman la tomó hace 109 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abierto
purescript/registry-dev#750 · 1 reacción · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Deprecate creation of legacy package setsQuizá libre de nuevo @mikesol la tomó hace 67 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abierto
purescript/registry-dev#745 · 5 comentarios · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de purescript/registry-dev
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
-
remove the use of `forget`Abiertogood first issue help wanted
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 80/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
milind-soni/OpenMausBot#5829 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día