26.0.x: higher client CPU per call for `fetchone()` / `execute()` compared to 4.0.2
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 32/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- databases, performance
Línea de trabajo
Start by running the included repro_overhead.py against 4.0.2 and 26.0.1 in both thin and thick modes to confirm the fetchone() and execute() CPU gap while fetchmany() stays flat. Then compare how the two versions handle the per-row fetch path, since that is where the regression appears. Done means the per-call overhead is traced to a specific change and the numbers come back within a few percent of 4.0.2 in both modes.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
- What versions are you using?
- python-oracledb: 26.0.1, compared with 4.0.2 (stock PyPI wheels)
- Oracle Database: 12.1.0.2.0
- Oracle Client (Thick mode): 19.18.0.0.0
- Python: 3.11.13
- platform.platform: Linux-6.18.54.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2-x86_64-with-glibc2.35
- sys.maxsize > 2**32: True
- Is it an error or a hang or a crash?
Neither: performance regression.
- What error(s) or behavior you are seeing?
fetchone() and execute() use more client CPU in 26.0.1 than in 4.0.2, in both Thin and Thick modes. fetchmany() is unchanged.
Client CPU time measured with the script below (seconds, average of two runs, each run being the median of 5):
| Operation | Mode | 4.0.2 | 26.0.1 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
fetchone() loop, 50k rows |
Thin | 0.182 | 0.237 | +31 % |
fetchone() loop, 50k rows |
Thick | 0.199 | 0.303 | +52 % |
2000 × (execute() + fetchone()) |
Thin | 0.383 | 0.445 | +16 % |
2000 × (execute() + fetchone()) |
Thick | 0.397 | 0.477 | +20 % |
fetchmany() scan, 50k rows |
Thin | 0.169 | 0.179 | +6 % |
fetchmany() scan, 50k rows |
Thick | 0.190 | 0.190 | 0 % |
- Does your application call init_oracle_client()?
Both modes were measured (Thin and Thick).
- Include a runnable Python script that shows the problem.
No schema needed. Run once with each oracledb version:
ORA_USER=... ORA_PASSWORD=... ORA_DSN=host:port/service python repro_overhead.py thin
ORA_USER=... ORA_PASSWORD=... ORA_DSN=host:port/service python repro_overhead.py thick
import os
import statistics
import sys
import time
import oracledb
MODE = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "thin"
ROWS = 50_000
N_EXEC = 2_000
REPEAT = 5
if MODE == "thick":
oracledb.init_oracle_client()
oracledb.defaults.arraysize = 100
oracledb.defaults.prefetchrows = 101
conn = oracledb.connect(user=os.environ["ORA_USER"], password=os.environ["ORA_PASSWORD"],
dsn=os.environ["ORA_DSN"])
SCAN = f"""select level, level / 7, date '2026-01-01' + mod(level, 365), 'row_' || level
from dual connect by level <= {ROWS}"""
ONE = "select :k, 'x' from dual"
def s1_fetchmany():
with conn.cursor() as cur:
cur.execute(SCAN)
while cur.fetchmany():
pass
def s2_execute_fetchone():
with conn.cursor() as cur:
for k in range(N_EXEC):
cur.execute(ONE, k=k)
cur.fetchone()
def s3_fetchone():
with conn.cursor() as cur:
cur.execute(SCAN)
while cur.fetchone() is not None:
pass
def cpu(fn):
fn() # warm-up
samples = []
for _ in range(REPEAT):
c0 = time.process_time()
fn()
samples.append(time.process_time() - c0)
return statistics.median(samples)
print("oracledb", oracledb.__version__, MODE)
print(f"fetchmany() scan of {ROWS} rows : CPU {cpu(s1_fetchmany):.3f} s")
print(f"{N_EXEC} x (execute() + fetchone()) : CPU {cpu(s2_execute_fetchone):.3f} s")
print(f"fetchone() loop over {ROWS} rows : CPU {cpu(s3_fetchone):.3f} s")
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 455
- Forks
- 119
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de oracle/python-oracledb
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
oracle/python-oracledb#623 ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
oracle/python-oracledb#622 ·
-
Client Library or Database
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
oracle/python-oracledb#620 · 4 comentarios ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 42/100
oracle/python-oracledb#619 ·
-
asyncio: DPY-4011 on connect_async() when the listener closes the original socket after a redirectPosiblemente ocupada @AlexGracas la tomó hace 15 días. Abierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
oracle/python-oracledb#616 ·
Todos los issues de oracle/python-oracledb
Issues similares
-
bug good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
yunaremaia/proto-drift#22 ·
-
bug good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
yunaremaia/memwatch#96 ·
-
bug good first issue
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 91/100
yunaremaia/ci-gate-watch#34 ·
-
bug good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
yunaremaia/agent-capability-attestation#64 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug good first issue
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
yunaremaia/agent-call-graph#43 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día