telemetryapi receiver: function log records not fully parsed (severity, custom fields, and body extraction)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 38/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Stack tecnológico
- aws, go
- Área
- api, observability
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con receiver.go y sigue cómo los registros de Telemetry API de texto plano, JSON envuelto y JSON sin formato se convierten en registros de log. Reproduce los cuatro casos de logging de Node.js y, después, compara la salida del receiver con el body, la severidad, la marca de tiempo, el ID de invocación y los atributos personalizados esperados que se describen aquí; la finalización también incluye el mapeo configurable propuesto de campos JSON.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Describe the bug
The telemetryapireceiver does not fully parse function log records. Severity, timestamp, request ID, and application-defined custom fields are silently dropped depending on the log format and how the application emits logs. In the worst case (raw JSON written to stdout with process.stdout.write), the entire log body disappears — the record is emitted with no body and no attributes.
Steps to reproduce
Deploy a Node.js Lambda function with the following handler:
export const handler = async () => {
console.log("Hello World") // case 1
console.log(JSON.stringify({msg: "JSON stringified message", userId: "user-123", action: "login", durationMs: 42})) // case 2
process.stdout.write("Plain text written directly to stdout" + "\n") // case 3
process.stdout.write(JSON.stringify({msg: "JSON stringified text written directly to stdout", userId: "user-123", action: "login", durationMs: 42}) + "\n") // case 4
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 1000));
}
Invoke the function and observe the log records exported by the telemetry API receiver.
What did you expect to see?
All four cases should produce consistent, well-structured OTel log records — independent of how the application logged the data — with body containing the message text, severityNumber populated from the level, faas.invocation_id from the request ID, and any custom fields (e.g. userId, action, durationMs) preserved as log attributes.
What did you see instead?
Plain text log format (default) — all cases broken
| # | body | severityNumber | faas.invocation_id |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "2026-03-15T...\tREQ_ID\tINFO\tHello World\n" (raw prefix embedded) |
0 ❌ | absent ❌ |
| 2 | "2026-03-15T...\tREQ_ID\tINFO\t{\"msg\":\"...\",\"userId\":\"user-123\",...}\n" (JSON unparsed) |
0 ❌ | absent ❌ |
| 3 | "Plain text written directly to stdout\n" |
0 ❌ | absent ❌ |
| 4 | "{\"msg\":\"...\",\"userId\":\"user-123\",...}\n" (JSON unparsed, custom fields unreachable) |
0 ❌ | absent ❌ |
JSON log format (AWS_LAMBDA_LOG_FORMAT=JSON) — case 4 is completely empty
| # | body | severityNumber | faas.invocation_id |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "Hello World" ✅ |
9 (Info) ✅ | set ✅ |
| 2 | "{\"msg\":\"...\",\"userId\":\"user-123\",...}" (JSON unparsed, custom fields dropped) ⚠️ |
9 (Info) ✅ | set ✅ |
| 3 | "Plain text written directly to stdout\n" ✅ |
9 (Info) ✅ | set ✅ |
| 4 | (no body at all — completely empty record) ❌❌ | 0 ❌ | absent ❌ |
Case 4 with JSON log format is the worst case: Lambda detects the raw {...} stdout write as a structured record and skips wrapping. The receiver looks for a "message" key, finds none ("msg" is used instead), and emits a completely empty log record with all fields silently dropped.
Root cause (receiver.go):
// plain text: verbatim storage, Lambda prefix never parsed
if line, ok := el.Record.(string); ok {
logRecord.Body().SetStr(line) // timestamp+requestId+level+message all in one string
}
// JSON format: only hardcoded "message" key; "msg" or any other key → empty record
} else if msg, ok := record["message"]; ok {
...
}
// no fallback for other keys → completely empty log record for case 4
What version of collector/language SDK version did you use?
Version: latest (main)
What language layer did you use?
Node.js, but the issue exists at the collector layer and affects all runtimes.
Additional context
Key insight: the message is always a JSON-stringified string
The actual message content is always a JSON-stringified string in the Telemetry API payload. Lambda's record wrapper (JSON log format) is the only structure provided:
- Plain text format:
record = "TIMESTAMP\tREQUEST_ID\tLEVEL\t<message as string>" - JSON log format:
record.messagecontains the JSON-stringified string (or plain string) - Raw JSON stdout write:
recordis the JSON object directly — no wrapper, nomessagekey
Expected output: plain text log format
| # | body | severityNumber | faas.invocation_id | attributes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "Hello World" |
9 (Info) | set | {} |
| 2 | "JSON stringified message" |
9 (Info) | set | {userId, action, durationMs} |
| 3 | "Plain text written directly to stdout" |
0 (no level) | set | {} |
| 4 | "JSON stringified text written directly to stdout" |
0 (no level) | set | {userId, action, durationMs} |
Case 2 expected OTel:
{
"timeUnixNano": 1773606626605000000,
"severityNumber": 9,
"severityText": "Info",
"body": "JSON stringified message",
"attributes": {
"type": "function",
"faas.invocation_id": "6fed457f-f0d2-4c3e-b912-11e5820f74c5",
"userId": "user-123",
"action": "login",
"durationMs": 42
}
}
Case 4 expected OTel:
{
"timeUnixNano": 1773606626606000000,
"severityNumber": 0,
"severityText": "",
"body": "JSON stringified text written directly to stdout",
"attributes": {
"type": "function",
"faas.invocation_id": "6fed457f-f0d2-4c3e-b912-11e5820f74c5",
"userId": "user-123",
"action": "login",
"durationMs": 42
}
}
Expected output: JSON log format (AWS_LAMBDA_LOG_FORMAT=JSON)
| # | body | severityNumber | faas.invocation_id | attributes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "Hello World" |
9 (Info) | set | {} |
| 2 | "JSON stringified message" |
9 (Info) | set | {userId, action, durationMs} |
| 3 | "Plain text written directly to stdout" |
9 (Info) | set | {} |
| 4 | "JSON stringified text written directly to stdout" |
9 (Info) | set | {userId, action, durationMs} |
Case 4 expected OTel (raw JSON record, no wrapper):
{
"timeUnixNano": 1773606987430000000,
"severityNumber": 9,
"severityText": "Info",
"body": "JSON stringified text written directly to stdout",
"attributes": {
"type": "function",
"userId": "user-123",
"action": "login",
"durationMs": 42
}
}
Proposed fix
1. Parse Lambda prefix for plain text records
For plain text records, parse the tab-delimited prefix:
"2026-03-15T20:30:26.603Z\t6fed457f-...\tINFO\tHello World\n"
└─ timeUnixNano ──────────┘ └─ faas.invocation_id ─┘ └─ level ─┘ └─ message ─┘
- Split on
\t— if 4 parts matchTIMESTAMP\tREQUEST_ID\tLEVEL\tMESSAGE, extract each field TIMESTAMP→timeUnixNano;REQUEST_ID→faas.invocation_id;LEVEL→severityNumberMESSAGE→ attempt JSON parse, then apply field mapping (see below)
2. Add json_message_parsing config block
When the message (or the record itself) is a JSON object, apply configurable field mapping. Remaining fields become log attributes.
receivers:
telemetryapi:
json_message_parsing:
body_fields: [message, msg, text, content] # first match → log body
severity_fields: [level, severity, lvl] # first match → severityNumber
timestamp_fields: [timestamp, time, ts] # first match → timeUnixNano
trace_id_fields: [traceId, trace_id] # first match → traceId
span_id_fields: [spanId, span_id] # first match → spanId
trace_flags_fields: [traceFlags, trace_flags, flags] # first match → flags
3. Extraction algorithm
Plain text format:
- Detect and parse Lambda prefix (
TIMESTAMP\tREQUEST_ID\tLEVEL\tMESSAGE) - Extract
timeUnixNano,faas.invocation_id,severityNumberfrom prefix fields - Treat everything after the third tab as the message string
- If the message is valid JSON, parse and apply field mapping; otherwise use as-is as body
JSON log format:
- Extract
timestamp,level,requestId,messagefrom the Lambda record wrapper - For the
messagevalue: if it's a string that parses as JSON, apply field mapping; otherwise use as-is - Special case — raw JSON record (no wrapper): apply field mapping directly to the top-level record object
Field mapping for JSON objects:
- For each semantic field, iterate configured names in order and use first match
- Convert values:
- body: string as-is; non-string → marshal to JSON string
- severity: parse to OTel severity number (
"info"→ 9,"warn"→ 13,"error"→ 17, etc.) - timestamp: parse ISO 8601 → nanoseconds; fall back to observed time
- trace_id / span_id: use as-is (hex string)
- trace_flags: parse hex byte →
flagsfield
- All remaining fields → log record attributes
Tip: React with 👍 to help prioritize this issue. Please use comments to provide useful context, avoiding +1 or me too, to help us triage it. Learn more here.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 433
- Forks
- 249
- Merge medio
- 1 d 12 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 39
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de open-telemetry/opentelemetry-lambda
-
enhancement ruby
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 64/100
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-lambda#2741 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
processor/cold_start
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-lambda#2738 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Fix install-toolsAbiertogo
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 64/100
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-lambda#2736 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Use node-sdk package for layerAbiertoenhancement javascript
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-lambda#2744 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
enhancement python
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-lambda#2742 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Todos los issues de open-telemetry/opentelemetry-lambda
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
tomasz-tomczyk/crit#1159 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
SelectOneHealthyInstance panics when instance weights are fractional (e.g. 0.5)Posiblemente ocupada @Ajax-1 la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
nacos-group/nacos-sdk-go#929 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
google/osv-scanner#3270 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Batch JSON validation reports the wrong input indexPosiblemente ocupada @Dazhou-del la tomó hoy. Abiertotype/bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
gin-gonic/gin#4928 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 6 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día