chore: upgrade Asp.Versioning.Mvc to v10.0.0
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Refactorización
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Stack tecnológico
- csharp, openapi
- Área
- backend-api-design
Línea de trabajo
First check whether Asp.Versioning.OpenApi has reached a stable NuGet release; the issue says to wait until it has. Then review TaskFlow.Api.csproj, Extensions/ApiVersioningServiceExtensions.cs, Extensions/OpenApiServiceExtensions.cs, and Program.cs for the versioning and OpenAPI wiring. Verify the Scalar UI, version tagged OpenAPI output, test suite, and vulnerable package report against the acceptance criteria.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
On hold (2026-10-30), part of #372 (Move to .NET 11). Verified from the NuGet nuspecs:
Asp.Versioning.OpenApi10.2.3 depends onMicrosoft.OpenApi [2.7.5, 3.0.0)and onMicrosoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi 10.0.10, andAsp.Versioning.Mvc10.2.1 targetsnet10.0only. The 2.7.5 pin in this repo satisfies that range, so the migration itself should resolve cleanly on .NET 10. But the<3.0.0cap is exactly what #301 has to get past:Microsoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi11.x needsMicrosoft.OpenApi3.10.2 or later. AdoptingAsp.Versioning.OpenApinow would block the .NET 11 move until Asp.Versioning ships a release that accepts Microsoft.OpenApi 3.x. 8.1.1 works on .NET 10, so there is no urgency. Take this with the .NET 11 move, or when such a release exists, whichever is first.
Background
Asp.Versioning.Mvc and Asp.Versioning.Mvc.ApiExplorer were held at 8.1.1 in #164 (backend NuGet dependency audit). The 10.x line carries breaking changes to OpenAPI wiring that require a dedicated migration.
Update (2026-10-12): the prerequisite is met. Asp.Versioning.OpenApi now has stable releases, and the latest versions on NuGet are:
| Package | Currently pinned | Latest stable |
|---|---|---|
Asp.Versioning.Mvc |
8.1.1 |
10.2.1 |
Asp.Versioning.Mvc.ApiExplorer |
8.1.1 |
10.2.1 |
Asp.Versioning.OpenApi (new) |
not referenced | 10.2.3 |
The original target of 10.0.0 is superseded. Target the latest stable release, and review the changelogs between 10.0.0 and 10.2.x for further breaking changes.
What needs to change
Version 10 changes how OpenAPI integration is wired:
- The old pattern (
services.AddOpenApi("v1", options => ...)fromMicrosoft.AspNetCore) is replaced by a fluent chain:AddApiVersioning().AddApiExplorer().AddOpenApi() app.MapOpenApi()must be replaced byapp.MapOpenApi().WithDocumentPerVersion()- The custom
ApiVersionDocumentTransformerinExtensions/OpenApiServiceExtensions.csmay need to be adapted or replaced by the newVersionedOpenApiOptionssurface - A new companion package
Asp.Versioning.OpenApiis required
Things to watch
Microsoft.OpenApiis pinned to2.7.5to resolve CVE-2026-49451 (commit0c60491). ConfirmAsp.Versioning.OpenApiresolves cleanly with that pin and that the CVE stays fixed (dotnet list package --vulnerable).- Current wiring:
Program.cscallsAddApiVersioningConfiguration()andOpenApiServiceExtensions.AddOpenApi(...), andapp.UseOpenApiWithScalar().
Files likely affected
TaskFlow.Api/TaskFlow.Api.csproj— addAsp.Versioning.OpenApi, bumpAsp.Versioning.MvcandAsp.Versioning.Mvc.ApiExplorerto the latest stable (10.2.1)TaskFlow.Api/Extensions/ApiVersioningServiceExtensions.csTaskFlow.Api/Extensions/OpenApiServiceExtensions.csTaskFlow.Api/Program.cs(ifMapOpenApicall needs updating)
Acceptance criteria
-
Asp.Versioning.OpenApiis at a stable release (10.2.3as of 2026-10-12) -
Asp.Versioning.MvcandAsp.Versioning.Mvc.ApiExplorerupdated to the latest stable (10.2.1) - Scalar UI at
/scalar/v1renders correctly with API version selection working - Generated OpenAPI JSON is valid and version-tagged
-
npm run gen:apistill produces a working client (the generator reads the live OpenAPI spec) - All backend tests pass (
dotnet test) anddotnet format --verify-no-changesis clean -
dotnet list package --vulnerablereports zero findings
- Lenguaje dominante
- C#
- Estrellas
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Merge medio
- 2 h 2 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 98
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de nevridge/TaskFlow
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
tech-debt
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de nevridge/TaskFlow
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
juandresrodca/AdminForge#54 ·
-
[辞書] C/C++のプリプロセッサ指令名を英字のままにするAbierto要トリアージ 辞書
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
yksr-melt/Meltype#1625 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Docs typoAbierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
MonoGame/docs.monogame.github.io#328 · 1 comentario ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
space-wizards/RobustToolbox#7197 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation high priority
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
lachydotmcg/capri-desktop#201 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día