skills/list, skills/get, resources/directory/read always fail: codec strips resultType before re-validating it
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 76/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- nodejs, typescript
- Área
- api
Línea de trabajo
Lee core/mcp/skillsSchemas.ts y el flujo de decodeResult() y request() en dist/src-NAgB4Mp8.cjs. Ejecuta la reproducción de dos archivos con la Inspector CLI y, a continuación, verifica que skills/list, skills/get y resources/directory/read acepten resultados conformes con la especificación sin el error de validación.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Description
Client.request() in @modelcontextprotocol/client (v2.0.0, the "modern era" v2 client used by protocol revision 2026-07-28) rejects every spec-conforming skills/list / skills/get / resources/directory/read result with:
Invalid result for skills/list: resultType: Invalid input: expected "complete"
even though the server's response genuinely has resultType: "complete", exactly as the spec requires. This isn't a server bug to work around — no response shape a server can send will satisfy this check, because the client deletes the field it's about to require.
Root cause
decodeResult() validates resultType and then strips it from the result before handing it off:
// dist/src-NAgB4Mp8.cjs, decodeResult()
if (rawResultType !== "complete") return { kind: "invalid", ... };
...
const lifted = { ...raw };
delete lifted["resultType"]; // <-- stripped here
return { kind: "complete", result: lifted };
Client.request() then validates that already-stripped object against the caller-supplied resultSchema:
// same file, request()
const result = decoded.result; // resultType is gone
validateStandardSchema(resultSchema, result).then((parseResult) => {
if (parseResult.success) resolve(parseResult.data);
else reject(new SdkError(SdkErrorCode.InvalidResult, `Invalid result for ${request.method}: ${parseResult.error}`));
}, reject);
The skills-extension (SEP-2640) methods still pass a schema that itself re-requires resultType:
// core/mcp/skillsSchemas.ts
const ModernListSkillsResultSchema = ListSkillsResultSchema.extend({
resultType: z.literal("complete"),
ttlMs: z.int().min(0),
cacheScope: z.enum(["public", "private"]),
});
So the sequence for every call is: codec checks resultType === "complete" → strips it → hands the result to a schema that requires resultType === "complete" → fails, always. resources/directory/read (ModernDirectoryReadResultSchema) and skills/get (ModernGetSkillEnvelopeSchema) have the identical .extend({ resultType: z.literal("complete") }) pattern and are equally affected (confirmed for resources/directory/read; skills/get wasn't independently confirmed against a real skill, but goes through the exact same code path).
The core list methods (resources/list, prompts/list, tools/list) are unaffected because their result schemas don't redundantly declare resultType.
Reproduction
Fully self-contained, no external server needed - two files:
repro-server.mjs — minimal, spec-conforming 2026-07-28 server implementing only server/discover and skills/list:
import { createServer } from 'node:http';
const PROTOCOL_VERSION = '2026-07-28';
function rpcResult(id, result) {
return {
jsonrpc: '2.0',
id,
result: { ...result, resultType: 'complete', ttlMs: 0, cacheScope: 'private' },
};
}
createServer((req, res) => {
let body = '';
req.on('data', (c) => (body += c));
req.on('end', () => {
const message = JSON.parse(body || '{}');
res.setHeader('Content-Type', 'application/json');
if (message.method === 'server/discover') {
res.writeHead(200);
res.end(JSON.stringify(rpcResult(message.id, {
supportedVersions: [PROTOCOL_VERSION],
capabilities: {
resources: {}, tools: {}, prompts: {},
extensions: { 'io.modelcontextprotocol/skills': { directoryRead: true } },
},
})));
return;
}
if (message.method === 'skills/list') {
// Spec-conforming: resultType is "complete", as the 2026-07-28 revision requires.
res.writeHead(200);
res.end(JSON.stringify(rpcResult(message.id, { skills: [] })));
return;
}
res.writeHead(404);
res.end(JSON.stringify({ jsonrpc: '2.0', id: message.id, error: { code: -32601, message: 'not implemented in this repro' } }));
});
}).listen(8080, () => console.log('Repro server listening on http://localhost:8080/mcp'));
repro-catalog.json — forces the Inspector CLI to skip legacy handshake detection and connect directly in modern era:
{
"mcpServers": {
"repro": {
"type": "streamable-http",
"url": "http://localhost:8080/mcp",
"protocolEra": "modern"
}
}
}
Steps:
node repro-server.mjs &
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector --cli --catalog ./repro-catalog.json --server repro --method skills/list
Result:
{"error":{"code":"error","message":"Invalid result for skills/list: resultType: Invalid input: expected \"complete\""}}
Expected
skills/list (and skills/get, resources/directory/read) should succeed against a server that returns a fully spec-conforming { skills: [...], resultType: "complete", ttlMs, cacheScope } result.
Suggested fix
ModernListSkillsResultSchema / ModernGetSkillEnvelopeSchema / ModernDirectoryReadResultSchema shouldn't re-declare resultType at all, since decodeResult() has already validated and stripped it by the time these schemas run - they should look like their non-"Modern" counterparts (ListSkillsResultSchema etc.), with the modern-vs-legacy distinction handled entirely by the codec layer, consistent with how the core list methods already work.
Environment
@modelcontextprotocol/inspector2.6.0 (bundles@modelcontextprotocol/client2.0.0)- Node v25.2.1, macOS 26.6.2 (also reproduced against a real application server, not just the minimal repro above)
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 13.6k
- Forks
- 2.3k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 14 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 53
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk
-
Stateless 405 response omits the Allow headerPosiblemente ocupada @Hugo-DDT la tomó hace 3 días. Abiertov2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk#2970 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[v2] @modelcontextprotocol/server inlines fast-uri 3.1.0, which has 9 published advisoriesPosiblemente ocupada @Andiii208 la tomó hace 5 días. Abiertov2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk#2966 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
v1 v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk#2946 · 4 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[v2] URI template reserved expansions encode existing %HH sequences againPosiblemente ocupada @takagibit18 la tomó hace 12 días. Abiertov1 v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk#2920 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[v2] URI template strict expansions leave !'()* unencodedPosiblemente ocupada @takagibit18 la tomó hace 12 días. Abiertov1 v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk#2919 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk
Issues similares
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
vercel/streamdown#673 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
docs(stream-protocol): document messageMetatadata on start/finish and the message-metadata chunkAbiertofactory-active task-identify-harness-labels-done task-identify-issue-type-done
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
vercel/ai#23375 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
agilepathway/label-checker#721 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
CLI Empathy needs triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
chromaui/chromatic-cli#1524 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día