filesystem: search_files does not expand non-wildcard excludePatterns like directory_tree does
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 72/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- node.js, typescript
Línea de trabajo
Lee searchFilesWithValidation en src/filesystem/lib.ts junto con buildTree en src/filesystem/server.ts para comparar cómo aplican las coincidencias de excludePatterns. Añade pruebas en src/filesystem/__tests__/lib.test.ts y src/filesystem/__tests__/server-tools.test.ts para exclusiones sin ruta en directorios de nivel superior y anidados. El trabajo estará terminado cuando search_files omita los subárboles de directorios coincidentes y su comportamiento coincida con el de directory_tree.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
While auditing src/filesystem on v2.0.0 (origin/main) following the #4857 spec refactor, I found a behavioral mismatch in how excludePatterns is evaluated between directory_tree (src/filesystem/server.ts) and search_files (src/filesystem/lib.ts).
When an LLM or user passes a bare directory or file name in excludePatterns (for example, ["node_modules", ".git"]), directory_tree excludes both the directory and its entire subtree, whereas search_files still traverses into the excluded directory and returns all files inside it.
Server & Environment
- Server:
filesystem(@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystemv2.0.0/origin/main) - Files:
src/filesystem/server.ts(buildTree) vs.src/filesystem/lib.ts(searchFilesWithValidation) - Protocol era / transport: Both
2026-07-28and2025-eraoverstdio/ in-memory client transport
Reproduction / Root Cause in v2/main
- In
directory_tree(src/filesystem/server.ts, lines 515–529),buildTreechecks whether an exclusion pattern contains*. If it does not, it automatically expands the pattern to match nested paths and subtrees (**/${pattern}and**/${pattern}/**), and skips recursing into the excluded directory:
const shouldExclude = excludePatterns.some((pattern) => {
if (pattern.includes("*")) {
return minimatch(relativePath, pattern, { dot: true });
}
// For files: match exact name or as part of path
// For directories: match as directory path
return (
minimatch(relativePath, pattern, { dot: true }) ||
minimatch(relativePath, `**/${pattern}`, { dot: true }) ||
minimatch(relativePath, `**/${pattern}/**`, { dot: true })
);
});
if (shouldExclude) continue;
- In
search_files(src/filesystem/lib.ts, lines 397–413),searchFilesWithValidationevaluatesminimatch(relativePath, excludePattern, { dot: true })directly without the non-wildcard expansion:
const relativePath = path.relative(rootPath, fullPath);
const shouldExclude = excludePatterns.some((excludePattern) =>
minimatch(relativePath, excludePattern, { dot: true }),
);
if (shouldExclude) continue;
What happens when a caller passes excludePatterns: ["node_modules"] or ["sub"]:
- At
node_modules(top-level):relativePathis"node_modules".minimatch("node_modules", "node_modules")istrue, soif (shouldExclude) continueskips recursing into top-levelnode_modules! - At
packages/app/node_modules(nested directory):relativePathis"packages/app/node_modules".minimatch("packages/app/node_modules", "node_modules")isfalse!search_filesenterspackages/app/node_modulesand traverses every file inside it. - When
excludePatterns: ["node_modules/*"]or["**/node_modules"](without trailing/**) is passed: Even if a pattern matches files inside a directory,search_filesstill wastes I/O recursing unless the directory entry itself matchesshouldExclude.
Expected vs. Actual Behavior
- Expected: Passing
excludePatterns: ["node_modules", ".git"](or a bare filename/directory name without*) tosearch_filesshould behave identically todirectory_tree: any nested directory or file matchingpattern,**/${pattern}, or**/${pattern}/**is excluded and its directory subtree is not traversed. - Actual:
directory_treeexcludes nestedpackages/app/node_modules, whilesearch_filestraverses intopackages/app/node_modulesand returns matches from inside it unless the caller explicitly writes**/node_modules/**.
Prompt to Reproduce Fix in the Agentic Workflow
Per CONTRIBUTING.md, here is the exact prompt to fix and test this in the factory workflow:
Unify `excludePatterns` matching between `directory_tree` (`src/filesystem/server.ts`) and `search_files` (`src/filesystem/lib.ts`):
1. Extract a shared helper (or update `searchFilesWithValidation` in `src/filesystem/lib.ts` to match `buildTree` in `src/filesystem/server.ts`) so that when an entry in `excludePatterns` does not contain `*`, it matches `minimatch(relativePath, pattern, { dot: true }) || minimatch(relativePath, `**/${pattern}`, { dot: true }) || minimatch(relativePath, `**/${pattern}/**`, { dot: true })`.
2. Add a protocol-level test in `src/filesystem/__tests__/server-tools.test.ts` (and unit test in `src/filesystem/__tests__/lib.test.ts`) verifying that `search_files` with a bare name in `excludePatterns` (e.g. `excludePatterns: ["ignored_dir"]`) excludes both top-level `ignored_dir/file.txt` and nested `nested/ignored_dir/file.txt`, matching `directory_tree`'s behavior.
3. Run `npm run format` and `npm run local:gate`.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 91.4k
- Forks
- 11.8k
- Merge medio
- 7 h 36 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 126
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de modelcontextprotocol/servers
-
bug v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 79/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#5215 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation server-git server-time v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#5213 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation v2
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#5212 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#5211 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
chore server-everything v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#5210 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de modelcontextprotocol/servers
Issues similares
-
[BUG] rag: sentence content can cross the reported sentence boundariesPosiblemente ocupada @LJK-ikun la tomó hoy. Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug needs-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
README: the Resource URI Schemas example's file://documents/* pattern only matches that literal URIAbierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
platformatic/mcp#361 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
frontend
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Push: sem service worker ou sem VAPID, o interruptor de Notificações fica ligado sem avisar nadaAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
melgarafael/DeskcommCRM#3164 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día