Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

filesystem, memory: descriptions don't say how to choose between list_directory / list_directory_with_sizes and delete_entities / delete_relations

Abierto Apto para principiantes
#5,071 2 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
2/5
Tiempo estimado
1-3 horas
Aptitud para principiantes
75/100
Tipo de issue
Documentación
Claridad
Bien especificado
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
typescript

Línea de trabajo

Empieza en src/filesystem y src/memory, lee las definiciones de las cuatro herramientas mencionadas y comprueba su comportamiento implementado. Actualiza solo sus descripciones y deja sin cambios los nombres y los esquemas, de modo que cada una explique cuándo usarla y cuándo elegir en su lugar a su herramienta hermana. El trabajo estará terminado cuando las descripciones distingan las herramientas con precisión, sin atribuirles comportamientos que el código no implementa.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Which server?

More than one server (filesystem and memory)

Protocol era

Both, or not era-specific

MCP client

Any. The issue is in the tool descriptions that every client shows the model.

The problem

Two pairs of tools have descriptions so alike that a model can't tell which one to call.

filesystem (2026.8.31): list_directory and list_directory_with_sizes

The descriptions are the same sentence for sentence. They differ only by ", including sizes" and "essential" vs "useful":

list_directory: Get a detailed listing of all files and directories in a specified path. Results clearly distinguish between files and directories with [FILE] and [DIR] prefixes. This tool is essential for understanding directory structure and finding specific files within a directory. Only works within allowed directories.

list_directory_with_sizes: Get a detailed listing of all files and directories in a specified path, including sizes. Results clearly distinguish between files and directories with [FILE] and [DIR] prefixes. This tool is useful for understanding directory structure and finding specific files within a directory. Only works within allowed directories.

Neither says when to pick it over the other, that list_directory_with_sizes can sort by size, or that it ends with totals.

memory (2026.8.31): delete_entities and delete_relations

delete_entities: Delete multiple entities and their associated relations from the knowledge graph

delete_relations: Delete multiple relations from the knowledge graph

Both are destructive. Asked to remove a link between two entities, a model that picks delete_entities deletes the entities themselves, with all their observations. Neither description says which one to use for that.

Solution you have in mind (optional)

Say in each description when to use the tool and when to use its sibling instead. Suggested text, written only from what the code does (I checked list_directory_with_sizes's sort and summary in dist/index.js):

  • list_directory: List the files and directories directly inside a path, each marked [FILE] or [DIR]. Use it to see what a directory contains; when you also need each entry's size or want entries sorted by size, use list_directory_with_sizes instead, and for a recursive view use directory_tree. Returns one line per entry. Only works within allowed directories.
  • list_directory_with_sizes: List the files and directories directly inside a path with each file's size, marked [FILE] or [DIR], sorted by name or by size (sortBy). Use it when sizes matter, such as finding the largest files; for names only, use list_directory, which returns less text. Returns one line per entry, followed by the totals. Only works within allowed directories.
  • delete_entities: Delete whole entities from the knowledge graph, together with every relation that points to or from them and all their observations. Use it only to remove an entity entirely; to remove a link between two entities and keep both, use delete_relations, and to remove facts from an entity, use delete_observations. Cannot be undone.
  • delete_relations: Delete specific relations (from, to, relationType) from the knowledge graph and keep the entities they connect. Use it to remove a link between two entities; to remove an entity itself, use delete_entities. Cannot be undone.
Which MCP feature does it demonstrate? (optional)

Tool descriptions, and how clients use them to choose a tool. As reference servers, these are what many people copy when writing their own.

Alternatives or workarounds you have tried

None on the server side. A client can add its own instructions, but every client would have to do it.

Already built it locally?

No code. The prompt I'd use: "In src/filesystem and src/memory, rewrite the descriptions of list_directory, list_directory_with_sizes, delete_entities and delete_relations so each says when to use it and names the sibling tool to use instead, using only behavior the code implements; keep tool names and schemas unchanged."

For context: I found these pairs with Forecall, a static linter for MCP tool descriptions that I maintain. It flags tool pairs whose descriptions overlap heavily. With the text above, its scores go from 38 and 48 to 65 and 70 for the two filesystem tools, and from 51 and 39 to 61 and 61 for the two memory tools. The scores are only a guide; the point is the missing "use X instead".

Before you submit
  • I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate.
  • This is a request for this repository or one of its servers, not a new server, the MCP specification or an SDK.
Lenguaje dominante
TypeScript
Estrellas
91k
Forks
11.8k
Merge medio
6 h 33 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
79

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de modelcontextprotocol/servers

Todos los issues de modelcontextprotocol/servers

Issues similares

Más issues de TypeScript

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.