filesystem, memory: descriptions don't say how to choose between list_directory / list_directory_with_sizes and delete_entities / delete_relations
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 75/100
- Tipo de issue
- Documentación
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- documentation
Línea de trabajo
Empieza en src/filesystem y src/memory, lee las definiciones de las cuatro herramientas mencionadas y comprueba su comportamiento implementado. Actualiza solo sus descripciones y deja sin cambios los nombres y los esquemas, de modo que cada una explique cuándo usarla y cuándo elegir en su lugar a su herramienta hermana. El trabajo estará terminado cuando las descripciones distingan las herramientas con precisión, sin atribuirles comportamientos que el código no implementa.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Which server?
More than one server (filesystem and memory)
Protocol era
Both, or not era-specific
MCP client
Any. The issue is in the tool descriptions that every client shows the model.
The problem
Two pairs of tools have descriptions so alike that a model can't tell which one to call.
filesystem (2026.8.31): list_directory and list_directory_with_sizes
The descriptions are the same sentence for sentence. They differ only by ", including sizes" and "essential" vs "useful":
list_directory: Get a detailed listing of all files and directories in a specified path. Results clearly distinguish between files and directories with [FILE] and [DIR] prefixes. This tool is essential for understanding directory structure and finding specific files within a directory. Only works within allowed directories.
list_directory_with_sizes: Get a detailed listing of all files and directories in a specified path, including sizes. Results clearly distinguish between files and directories with [FILE] and [DIR] prefixes. This tool is useful for understanding directory structure and finding specific files within a directory. Only works within allowed directories.
Neither says when to pick it over the other, that list_directory_with_sizes can sort by size, or that it ends with totals.
memory (2026.8.31): delete_entities and delete_relations
delete_entities: Delete multiple entities and their associated relations from the knowledge graph
delete_relations: Delete multiple relations from the knowledge graph
Both are destructive. Asked to remove a link between two entities, a model that picks delete_entities deletes the entities themselves, with all their observations. Neither description says which one to use for that.
Solution you have in mind (optional)
Say in each description when to use the tool and when to use its sibling instead. Suggested text, written only from what the code does (I checked list_directory_with_sizes's sort and summary in dist/index.js):
list_directory: List the files and directories directly inside a path, each marked [FILE] or [DIR]. Use it to see what a directory contains; when you also need each entry's size or want entries sorted by size, use list_directory_with_sizes instead, and for a recursive view use directory_tree. Returns one line per entry. Only works within allowed directories.list_directory_with_sizes: List the files and directories directly inside a path with each file's size, marked [FILE] or [DIR], sorted by name or by size (sortBy). Use it when sizes matter, such as finding the largest files; for names only, use list_directory, which returns less text. Returns one line per entry, followed by the totals. Only works within allowed directories.delete_entities: Delete whole entities from the knowledge graph, together with every relation that points to or from them and all their observations. Use it only to remove an entity entirely; to remove a link between two entities and keep both, use delete_relations, and to remove facts from an entity, use delete_observations. Cannot be undone.delete_relations: Delete specific relations (from, to, relationType) from the knowledge graph and keep the entities they connect. Use it to remove a link between two entities; to remove an entity itself, use delete_entities. Cannot be undone.
Which MCP feature does it demonstrate? (optional)
Tool descriptions, and how clients use them to choose a tool. As reference servers, these are what many people copy when writing their own.
Alternatives or workarounds you have tried
None on the server side. A client can add its own instructions, but every client would have to do it.
Already built it locally?
No code. The prompt I'd use: "In src/filesystem and src/memory, rewrite the descriptions of list_directory, list_directory_with_sizes, delete_entities and delete_relations so each says when to use it and names the sibling tool to use instead, using only behavior the code implements; keep tool names and schemas unchanged."
For context: I found these pairs with Forecall, a static linter for MCP tool descriptions that I maintain. It flags tool pairs whose descriptions overlap heavily. With the text above, its scores go from 38 and 48 to 65 and 70 for the two filesystem tools, and from 51 and 39 to 61 and 61 for the two memory tools. The scores are only a guide; the point is the missing "use X instead".
Before you submit
- I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate.
- This is a request for this repository or one of its servers, not a new server, the MCP specification or an SDK.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 91k
- Forks
- 11.8k
- Merge medio
- 6 h 33 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 79
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de modelcontextprotocol/servers
-
git: git_create_branch is marked non-destructive but silently resets an existing packed branchAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#5059 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
mcp-server-fetch: `fetch` prompt returns JSON-RPC error code 0 with the raw exception text for an invalid URLQuizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#4914 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
CLAUDE.md: tool-naming rule (kebab-case) disagrees with filesystem and memory serversPosiblemente ocupada @liang0417 la tomó hace 10 días. Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#4892 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Filesystem README recommends deprecated MCP Roots protocol for restricting directory accessPosiblemente ocupada @its-amann la tomó hace 15 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#4844 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Docs: `fetch` installs npm packages during a tool call, which is worth stating for deploymentsPosiblemente ocupada @teddiesloco la tomó hace 18 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#4830 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de modelcontextprotocol/servers
Issues similares
-
Add: YRF Music NepalAbiertostreams:add
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
walletbeat/walletbeat#1558 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
hawk-digital-environments/HAWKI#438 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
GiganticMinecraft/seichi-portal-frontend#1165 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día