Nightly security sweep: turn Dependabot and code-scanning (CodeQL) alerts into board-tracked issues
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 48/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- github, github-actions, javascript
Línea de trabajo
Start with scripts/dependabot-alerts.mjs, dependabot-alerts.yml, and the relevant rules in AGENTS.md; compare the existing Dependabot sweep with the CodeQL API and workflow permissions described here. Check the credential dependency in #2544 and the v2/main scanning split in #2545 before implementation. Done means nightly, deduplicated Dependabot and code-scanning findings are filed and boarded, while malformed listings write nothing.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Problem
Security alerts reach this repo from two GitHub sources, and only one of them becomes tracked work:
| Source | What produces it | Swept into issues today? |
|---|---|---|
| Dependabot alerts | vulnerable dependency ranges in a lockfile | Yes, daily (dependabot-alerts.yml, #2233). It files issues, but cannot board them: PROJECT_TOKEN does not exist (#2462). |
| Code scanning alerts | CodeQL (default setup), plus any other tool that uploads SARIF | No. Nothing reads them. |
CodeQL is not a third source: it is the tool behind the code-scanning alerts on Security → Code scanning. A sweep reads them all through one API, GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/code-scanning/alerts, and can split by tool.name.
What that gap cost during the v2.9.0 release:
- A high-severity ReDoS reached the release PR undetected. CodeQL flagged
clients/cli/src/error-handler.ts:169only as a check on the milestone-merge PR (#2536). It was a regression from this milestone's #2423 work, fixed in #2540 / #2541, with the release on hold meanwhile. - Three high-severity alerts sit open with no issue: #74, #75, #76, all
js/incomplete-sanitization("does not escape backslash characters"), inscripts/dependabot-alerts.mjs:435,:679andscripts/sdk-watch.mjs:442. Nothing tracks them, and the code is unchanged onv2/main.
The deeper problem: CodeQL never looks at v2/main
CodeQL runs as default setup (languages: actions, javascript-typescript, schedule: weekly). Default setup analyzes the default branch (main) and PRs that target it. Every analysis on record is refs/heads/main or a PR into main, and the only PRs analyzed are the four milestone merges (#2304, #2381, #2456, #2536).
So no v2 development work is scanned until the milestone merge. A nightly sweep of the alerts cannot fix that on its own: an alert for code on v2/main does not exist until that code reaches a PR against main. It is the same blind spot AGENTS.md already records for Dependabot ("a vulnerable dependency introduced on v2/main and not yet merged to main produces no alert at all"), and for CodeQL it covers every line of first-party code.
Goal
A nightly sweep turns open Dependabot and code-scanning alerts into board-tracked issues, one per actionable finding, with no duplicates, the same way dependabot-alerts.yml does for Dependabot today.
Scanning v2/main itself, so that those alerts exist for v2 code before the release PR, is split out as #2545.
Design sketch
The sweep
Extend scripts/dependabot-alerts.mjs into a security-alert sweep, or add a sibling scripts/code-scanning-alerts.mjs with a shared filing and boarding core. It keeps the existing sweep's invariants:
- Re-check against
v2/mainbefore filing. Dependabot re-checks each vulnerable range againstv2/main's lockfile. For code scanning, the equivalent is to take the alert on thev2/mainref once #2545 makes that ref exist. Until then, check that the alert's file and line still hold the flagged code onv2/main, and skip one already fixed there. - One issue per finding, deduplicated by a marker that encodes tool + rule + alert number, with markers trusted only on automation-authored issues (the
AGENTS.mdrule, since the repo is public). - Board it directly at
Todo/Highonce the credential exists, the same standing override the Dependabot sweep uses. Without the credential, fall back to the labeled, milestoned triage hand-off. - Fail loudly on a bad listing (rate limit, truncated or 5xx response) and write nothing, as #2425 made the Dependabot sweep do.
- Never close an issue. A fixed alert closes itself; closing its issue is a maintainer act.
- No model in any write-capable job. This sweep is deterministic and needs none.
Out of scope unless we choose it: secret scanning (GET …/secret-scanning/alerts). It is a third alert type, would need its own read permission, and its alerts should not be copied into a public issue body. Decide explicitly rather than by omission.
Credential
The GitHub App is now its own issue, #2544, and its permission list there already includes what this sweep needs:
| Permission (GitHub App) | Needed for | Workflow permissions: equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| Repository → Dependabot alerts: read | GET …/dependabot/alerts |
vulnerability-alerts: read |
| Repository → Code scanning alerts: read | GET …/code-scanning/alerts |
security-events: read |
| Repository → Administration: read (optional) | turns the sweep's automated-security-fixes check from UNVERIFIED into a real assertion |
none: GITHUB_TOKEN cannot hold it |
| Repository → Secret scanning alerts: read (only if secret scanning is in scope) | GET …/secret-scanning/alerts |
secret-scanning-alerts: read |
Both reads are available to GITHUB_TOKEN through workflow permissions:, so the listing half does not strictly need the App. Only the board write does. Putting everything on the App still keeps the sweep to one identity with one scope list, so add the two read permissions when the App is created.
Blocked on
#2544 (the GitHub App), for the board write. Part of tracker #2543.
Acceptance
- A nightly sweep files one issue per open, unfixed-on-
v2/mainDependabot and code-scanning alert, deduplicated, and boards it atTodo/Highwhen the credential is present - The sweep fails loudly, writing nothing, on a rate-limited or malformed listing
- The sweep would file today's open alerts; #74, #75 and #76 are being fixed directly in #2546
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 11.1k
- Forks
- 1.6k
- Merge medio
- 5 h 32 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 153
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de modelcontextprotocol/inspector
-
chore(deps): upgrade the MCP TypeScript SDK to 2.4.0Posiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abiertochore dependencies v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 80/100
modelcontextprotocol/inspector#2784 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Sort tools listing by selector or titlePosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abiertoenhancement v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
modelcontextprotocol/inspector#2782 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
CLI tests seed the developer's real ~/.mcp-inspector/mcp.json (cli.test.ts, completion.test.ts)Abiertobug v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
modelcontextprotocol/inspector#2765 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
chore v2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
modelcontextprotocol/inspector#2752 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
SSE transport: connection succeeds then marked 'Failed' after first event, works fine with raw curlAbierto
Dificultad 4/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 53/100
modelcontextprotocol/inspector#2783 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de modelcontextprotocol/inspector
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
awesome-dsh-plugin/awesome-dsh-plugin#9184 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
farion1231/cc-switch#8829 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[core-client] Remove unused hand-maintained transport helpers after the definition-table cutoverAbiertodoc-audit enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100