[FEATURE] Preserve Workspace Folder Structure on 'export'
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 48/100
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con el procesamiento del argumento de exportación en src/fabric_cli/parsers/fab_fs_parser.py y, después, lee los clientes de carpetas, elementos de workspace y definiciones de elementos en src/fabric_cli/client/fab_api_folders.py, fab_api_workspace.py y fab_api_item.py. El trabajo estará terminado cuando --preserve-folders reproduzca las rutas de las carpetas de los elementos, mientras que la exportación predeterminada siga siendo plana, incluidos los elementos de nivel raíz.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Use Case / Problem
Problem Statement
I'm exporting a Fabric workspace to my local filesystem for backup and version control. My workspace uses folders to organize items logically—by feature, department, or data source—but the current export functionality strips away this structure entirely.
Current Limitation
The export command flattens the folder hierarchy. When I export an item located at MyWorkspace/Sales Reports/Q1_Report.Report, it creates Q1_Report.Report/ directly in the output directory, completely discarding the Sales Reports/ parent folder. This eliminates the organizational context that's critical for understanding the project.
Impact on Workflow
This limitation breaks DevOps and GitOps practices. In code-managed Fabric environments, folder structure isn't just organizational—it's fundamental to the project architecture. Without it, I can't:
- Navigate locally: The flat structure makes it nearly impossible to find items quickly or understand relationships between assets.
- Conduct meaningful code reviews: Git diffs lose context when the logical grouping disappears, making it harder for teams to review changes effectively.
- Automate deployments: Re-importing assets while preserving the intended workspace organization becomes manual and error-prone.
Requested Enhancement
Preserve the full folder hierarchy during workspace export. If an item exists at MyWorkspace/Sales Reports/Q1_Report.Report, the export should create Sales Reports/Q1_Report.Report/ in the output directory, maintaining the complete path structure.
This would enable seamless integration with modern development workflows and make Fabric workspaces truly manageable as code.
Proposed Solution
Specific commands or functionality:
Extend the existing export command with a --preserve-folders flag to maintain the workspace's folder hierarchy during export.
fab export <workspace_name> -o <output_path> --preserve-folders
Expected behavior and output:
With the --preserve-folders flag enabled, the export command replicates the complete folder structure from the Fabric workspace to the local filesystem.
Example:
Starting with this workspace structure in Fabric:
/MyWorkspace.Workspace/
├── Reports/
│ └── Sales_Report.Report
└── Notebooks/
└── Data_Processing.Notebook
Current Behavior (fab export MyWorkspace.Workspace -o ./local_export --all):
./local_export/
├── Sales_Report.Report/
│ └── ... (item files)
└── Data_Processing.Notebook/
└── ... (item files)
All items export to a flat structure, losing the original folder organization.
Expected Behavior (fab export MyWorkspace.Workspace -o ./local_export --all --preserve-folders):
./local_export/
├── Reports/
│ └── Sales_Report.Report/
│ └── ... (item files)
└── Notebooks/
└── Data_Processing.Notebook/
└── ... (item files)
The original folder hierarchy is preserved, making it easier to understand project organization.
Integration with existing fabric-cli features:
This enhancement naturally extends the export command and strengthens the CLI's filesystem metaphor established by commands like ls, cd, and mkdir. It also sets the foundation for a complementary import enhancement that could automatically recreate folder structures in target workspaces, enabling true round-trip workflows.
Alternatives Considered
No response
Impact Assessment
- This would help me personally
- This would help my team/organization
- This would help the broader fabric-cli community
- This aligns with Microsoft Fabric roadmap items
Implementation Attestation
- I understand this feature should maintain backward compatibility with existing commands
- I confirm this feature request does not introduce performance regressions for existing workflows
- I acknowledge that new features must follow fabric-cli's established patterns and conventions
Implementation Notes
- Relevant Fabric REST APIs:
This feature can be efficiently implemented using three core APIs that minimize the number of calls needed:
-
GET /v1/workspaces/{workspaceId}/folders?recursive=True: Found insrc/fabric_cli/client/fab_api_folders.py, this single call retrieves the entire folder hierarchy for a workspace—no recursiveGET /folders/{folderId}calls required. The response includes each folder'sid,displayName, andparentFolderId. -
GET /v1/workspaces/{workspaceId}/items: This API (infab_api_workspace.py) returns a flat list of all workspace items. The critical property isfolderId, which links each item to its parent folder in the hierarchy. Root-level items won't have afolderId. -
POST /v1/workspaces/{workspaceId}/items/{itemId}/getDefinition: The existing API used by theexportcommand (fab_api_item.py) to fetch an item's actual definition content. This part of the logic would remain unchanged.
-
Command Structure or Argument Patterns:
A new optional flag should be added to the
exportcommand insrc/fabric_cli/parsers/fab_fs_parser.py. A good name would be--preserve-folders. -
Compatibility Concerns:
To ensure backward compatibility, this new behavior should only be triggered when the
--preserve-foldersflag is present. The default behavior of theexportcommand (flattening the directory structure) should remain unchanged to avoid breaking existing user scripts and workflows.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 174
- Forks
- 64
- Merge medio
- 6 d 38 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 5
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de microsoft/fabric-cli
-
[FEATURE] Loosen strict dependency pins to improve compatibility with newer `fabric-cicd` versionsQuizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. Abiertoai:feature-triage:unable-to-process enhancement
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
microsoft/fabric-cli#294 · 2 comentarios · 1 reacción ·
-
[BUG] bulk-export errors with "[NotSupported] Only supported for Lakehouse/Files"Quizá libre de nuevo @rksharma-owg la tomó hace 40 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abiertoai:bug-triage:unable-to-process bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
microsoft/fabric-cli#287 · 2 comentarios ·
-
ai:feature-triage:unable-to-process enhancement
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 64/100
microsoft/fabric-cli#292 · 1 comentario ·
-
ai:question-triage:unable-to-process question
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
microsoft/fabric-cli#288 · 2 comentarios ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 52/100
microsoft/fabric-cli#286 · 3 comentarios ·
Todos los issues de microsoft/fabric-cli
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 77/100
khuisman/mcp-gee-sweet#1166 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
lugassawan/swe-workbench#823 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
gramaziokohler/compas_timber#870 ·
-
security-scan-failure
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
semantica-agi/semantica#2089 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
autowarefoundation/autoware_carla_scenario#500 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día