SWE-smith tasks expose the pre-bug code through git history (`git checkout HEAD~1 -- .`)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
Línea de trabajo
Start in debug_gym/gym/envs/swe_smith.py, where the bug patch is applied and committed (around lines 100-112), then read setup_terminal in swe_bench.py, which the issue says keeps older commits. Check that the gold patch and eval() still work on the working tree and index after the history is replaced. Done when git checkout HEAD~1 -- . no longer restores the pre-bug code, and tests/gym/envs/test_swe_smith.py (around lines 103-110) is updated and passing.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
What happens
SWESmithEnv commits the bug patch on top of the code from before the bug, and the gold patch is the bug patch reversed. So for a patch that only changes tracked files, HEAD~1 holds exactly the code the gold patch produces. With the bash tool from configs/swesmith.yaml, an agent can run git checkout HEAD~1 -- . and submit. In every task I ran, that scored exactly what the gold patch scores, without any debugging.
Code at 3f72ecc400a11752fc68cf08428225b6ba01a99e:
swe_bench.py#L129-L134:SWEBenchEnv.setup_terminal(inherited) commits the setup and removes the remote "so the agent won't see newer commits". Older commits stay.swe_smith.py#L105-L112: applies the bug patch, then runsgit commit -am 'Applying bug patch for <instance_id>'.swe_smith.py#L100-L103: the gold patch is the bug patch applied withgit apply --reverse.swe_smith.py#L149-L155:eval()restores the test files from the index, then runs the tests in the same container.git checkout HEAD~1 -- .updates the index too, so that reset does not undo it, andcalculate_scoregrades the same code the gold patch would produce.test_swe_smith.py#L103-L110asserts thatgit show HEADequals the bug patch.
In the container, git log --oneline shows:
a53785d Applying bug patch for john-kurkowski__tldextract.3d1bf184.combine_file__1vnuqpt4
50ed423 Initial commit
The image's .git also keeps the commit objects of the SWE-smith task branches (Bug Patch / Remove F2P Tests) after git remote remove origin. That is 202 commit objects in the tldextract image and 1,882 in the oauthlib image, with 2 reachable. So amending the commit or deleting refs would not be enough on its own.
Reproduction
The tasks are built through debug_gym.experiment.create_env with the shipped configs/swesmith.yaml (Docker terminal; bash, view, edit, submit). They are driven by scripted tool calls through env.step. Results on 3f72ecc, Docker 29.1.3:
| Task | no-op, then submit | env.apply_gold_patch(), then submit |
bash git checkout HEAD~1 -- ., then submit |
|---|---|---|---|
john-kurkowski__tldextract.3d1bf184.combine_file__1vnuqpt4 |
0/39 | 39/39, resolved | 39/39, resolved |
oauthlib__oauthlib.1fd52536.combine_file__09vlzwgc |
0/18 | 18/18, resolved | 18/18, resolved |
seatgeek__thefuzz.8a05a3ee.combine_file__2uoca06x |
0/25 | 25/25, resolved | 25/25, resolved |
iterative__dvc.1d6ea681.pr_7514 (the patch also adds a file) |
0/7 | 7/7, resolved | 7/7, resolved |
kurtmckee__feedparser.cad965a3.combine_file__115z1mk8 |
0/2226 | 2223/2226, unresolved | 2223/2226, unresolved |
Minimal manual version (any task from the table above where the gold patch resolves):
env = create_env(dict(config, uuid=str(uuid.uuid4())), task_data, logger) # config = configs/swesmith.yaml
env.reset()
env.step(ToolCall(id="1", name="bash", arguments={"command": "git checkout HEAD~1 -- ."}))
info = env.step(ToolCall(id="2", name="submit", arguments={}))
assert info.resolved
Scope
At the dataset revision SWESmithEnv.load_dataset pins (699b5340), there are 50,103 tasks after the excluded list. In 50,090 of them, the bug patch only modifies or deletes tracked files, so git checkout HEAD~1 -- . restores the same tracked files as the gold patch. The other 13 also add files, which git commit -am leaves untracked. The one I tested (dvc above) still scored like the gold patch.
Impact
- RL:
git logshows the bug commit ("Applying bug patch for ..."), and one bash command then earns the gold patch's reward. A policy that finds this is rewarded for restoring code from git history instead of for debugging. - Eval: an agent that looks at git history can be graded resolved without fixing the bug, so resolve rates can be inflated with no sign of it in the score.
Suggested fix
After applying the bug patch, replace .git with a new repository whose only commit is the buggy code. It should track the same files as before, plus any file the bug patch adds. Once the old object store is gone, HEAD~1, the old commit objects and the task-branch objects go with it. The gold patch and eval() work on the working tree and index, so they keep working. A PR with this change follows.
R2EGymEnv has a related TODO: remove .git/ entirely? at r2egym.py#L240. This issue covers SWE-smith only.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 308
- Forks
- 47
- Merge medio
- 2 d 5 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 9
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Sin guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de microsoft/debug-gym
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Remove example of bashAbierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Size limit for viewAbierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 42/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
microsoft/debug-gym#304 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Todos los issues de microsoft/debug-gym
Issues similares
-
[yugabyted] xcluster set_up and add_to_replication fail for database names containing - . or (Abiertokind/bug priority/medium qa_automation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
yugabyte/yugabyte-db#37324 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
good first issue
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 87/100
btclib-org/btclib-node#2260 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
ChatBedrockConverse changes the keys of JSON tool results to camelCase (`order_id` becomes `orderId`)Posiblemente ocupada @geyazheng la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
langchain-ai/langchain-aws#1469 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
GCToggler leaves collection enabled if the body re-enables itPosiblemente ocupada @Gambit-Checkmate la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 7 días
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
EESSI/docs#949 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día