Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Generic argument narrowed from `T | undefined` collapses a dependent conditional return type to `never`/`undefined`

Abierto
#64,398 1 comentario 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
45/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bien especificado
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
typescript
Área
compilers

Línea de trabajo

Start by running the supplied TypeScript reproduction in the Playground and compare the inferred types with and without the truthy narrowing. Trace the generic narrowing and conditional-type evaluation involved in the get call; done means the narrowed call preserves the value type and reports number | undefined rather than plain undefined, with a regression test covering the case.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Bug Report

  • This is a bug, not a question.

TypeScript Version

Reproduces on 6.0.3 and on 7.0.2 (npx typescript@latest, checked 2026-09-22) — not a recent regression, present in both.

Search Terms

narrowing generic T & {}, distributive conditional type never, naked type parameter
narrowed loses distributivity, generic argument narrowed conditional return type never,
extends infer R generic narrowing never

Code

type PlainObject<T> = Exclude<T, string | number | boolean | null | undefined> & object;
type Keys<T> = PlainObject<T> extends infer R ? keyof R : never;
type ValueAt<T, K extends Keys<T>> =
  PlainObject<T> extends infer R ? (K extends keyof R ? R[K] : never) : never;

declare function get<const T, const K extends Keys<T>>(obj: T, key: K): ValueAt<T, K>;

// Works as expected: no narrowing involved, return type resolves to the real value type.
function withoutNarrowing<T, K extends Keys<T>>(obj: T, key: K) {
  return get(obj, key);
}

// Bug: same call, but obj/key were first narrowed down from `T | undefined` via a truthy check.
function withNarrowing<T, K extends Keys<T>>(obj: T | undefined, key: K | undefined) {
  if (!obj || !key) return;
  return get(obj, key);
}

const ok = withoutNarrowing({ a: 1 }, 'a');  // number -- correct
const bug = withNarrowing({ a: 1 }, 'a');    // undefined -- wrong, should be `number | undefined`

Playground (paste the code above manually if this link doesn't load it correctly)

(The playground snippet includes two extra lines, checkOk/checkBug, that force the compiler to print each variable's real type in an error message — remove them, or just hover over ok/bug instead.)

Expected behavior

bug's type should be number | undefined — same as ok, plus undefined from the
early return. obj/key are proven non-nullable at the get(obj, key) call site (right
after the if (!obj || !key) return; guard), so the call should behave identically to
withoutNarrowing.

Actual behavior

bug's type collapses to plain undefined — the ValueAt<T, K> branch silently
resolves to never, so the union ValueAt<T, K> | undefined simplifies away the real
value type entirely. No error is raised anywhere; the incorrect type just propagates
silently, which is the dangerous part (a consumer reading bug's type has no signal
anything went wrong).

Root cause (as far as I could narrow it down): after if (!obj || !key) return;, obj
narrows to T & {} rather than to T (documented since TS 4.8, to stay sound about
generics that could structurally include null/undefined). T & {} is an intersection
type, not the naked type parameter symbol T anymore — and Keys<T>/ValueAt<T, K>
rely on T being naked for their X extends infer R ? ... : never conditionals to stay
deferred (unevaluated) until a concrete T is substituted. Once inference for the get
call has to work with T & {} (and its constraint, unknown), the checker seems to try
to evaluate the conditional eagerly instead of deferring it, and it collapses to never.

This only reproduces with the X extends infer R ? ... : never indirection present in
both Keys<T> and ValueAt<T, K> — a version without that indirection (e.g. a plain
T[K] lookup instantiated through a similarly-shaped generic call) resolves correctly
even after the same narrowing, so the infer R step specifically seems to be what tips
the checker into eager evaluation.

Workaround found

Passing the type arguments explicitly at the call site avoids the bug entirely, since it
sidesteps inference off the narrowed (T & {}) argument type altogether:

function withNarrowingFixed<T, K extends Keys<T>>(obj: T | undefined, key: K | undefined) {
  if (!obj || !key) return;
  return get<T, K>(obj, key); // <- explicit type args: back to `number | undefined`
}

Related Issues

Related in that they deal with narrowing + generic conditional types, but none is an exact duplicate of the scenario above, as far as I could tell.

Image
Lenguaje dominante
Go
Estrellas
111k
Forks
14.4k
Merge medio
2 d 1 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
126

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de microsoft/TypeScript

Todos los issues de microsoft/TypeScript

Issues similares

Más issues de Go

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.