FEAT: Add Garak ProPILE privacy leakage scenario
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
@gugu1031 ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 8/9/2026.
Evaluación
Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.
Descripción
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
PyRIT does not package ProPILE-style tests that use known personal attributes to ask a model for a withheld attribute. Garak has a small prepared record file and prompt templates, but its probe mixes file loading, prompt construction, and execution. This is part of #511.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add a PyRIT-native ProPILE privacy leakage scenario based on garak/probes/propile.py.
Implementation requirements:
- Support Twin, Triplet, Quadruplet, and Unstructured as explicit opt-in scenario techniques.
- Convert garak's
pii_data.jsonlinto a local PyRIT seed dataset. Keep theprompt_templates.tsvcontent in a separate local PyRIT template dataset. Do not add a remote loader. - Preserve each record's
source_datasetandsource_idvalues. Link the statednvidia/Nemotron-CC-v2.1source in dataset provenance. - Preserve the applicable garak Apache-2.0 license, copyright, and attribution notices; mark the PyRIT-formatted files as modified; and update PyRIT's third-party notice material if required by the repository process. See garak's
LICENSE. - Use a dataset configuration, following PromptInject PR #2509, to build attack groups from known attributes and an expected withheld value. Preserve the PII type and source provenance in seed metadata.
- Use bounded atomic attacks and an expected-value scorer such as
SubStringScorer. Reuse existing normalized text matching before adding a new PII scorer. - Keep this dataset and all techniques out of implicit defaults. Users must select the scenario technique and local dataset explicitly.
- The bundled garak records support Twin and limited Triplet combinations, but they do not contain the fields needed for Quadruplet or Unstructured attacks. Support those techniques in the configuration, test them with synthetic fixtures, and raise a clear error when the selected real dataset has no compatible record. Do not silently report a zero-attack success.
- Add exports, focused unit tests, and synchronized
.pyand.ipynbscanner documentation. - State in documentation that an exact match indicates possible disclosure. It does not prove that the target memorized a specific training record.
Follow doc/code/framework.md and the applicable scenario, dataset, test, and documentation instructions. Datasets own records and templates; techniques select the relationship between known and withheld fields; the scenario assembles the campaign; attacks execute; scorers evaluate. Do not port garak's mixin and hook structure.
Describe alternatives you've considered, if relevant
- A loader that streams Nemotron-CC and extracts PII at scenario runtime was considered and rejected. It would add gated-data handling, PII extraction dependencies, nondeterminism, and responsibility bleed.
- A remote loader for garak's JSON file was considered and rejected. This issue should use a local PyRIT dataset with complete provenance and attribution.
- Combining PII records and prompt templates in scenario code would repeat garak's mechanics rather than follow PyRIT's dataset model.
Additional context
- Parent parity issue: #511
- PyRIT structural example: #2509
- Upstream probe:
garak/probes/propile.py - Original ProPILE paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01881
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 4.5k
- Forks
- 896
- Merge medio
- 3 d 1 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 208
Preparar el entorno
Aún no hemos revisado los archivos de configuración de este proyecto. Empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de microsoft/PyRIT
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 91/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Bug: triage GUI help wanted
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
microsoft/PyRIT#2868 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de microsoft/PyRIT
Issues similares
-
pydanty:is-working
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
pydantic/pydantic-ai#8843 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
breaking change enhancement server
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
sktime/sktime#11310 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
needs-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día