Observability for LiveKit Inference TTS fallback (which model served the request), especially in expressive mode
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 38/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- python
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading inference/tts.py and tracing how it handles the session.created payload and populates tts_node spans, TTSModelUsage, and TTSMetrics; compare this with _record_fallback_served in tts.FallbackAdapter. The issue is done when per-request observability identifies whether a fallback served audio and which model served it, with corresponding usage attribution; the payload also identifies analogous STT fallback behavior and expressive-mode markup as related concerns.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Feature Type
Would make my life easier
Feature Description
We use expressive mode with an inference.TTS primary and server-side fallbacks:
tts = inference.TTS(
model="xai/tts-1",
voice="ursa",
language="ja",
fallback=[
{"model": "inworld/inworld-tts-2", "voice": "Asuka"},
{"model": "cartesia/sonic-3.6", "voice": "<voice id>"},
{"model": "google/gemini-3.8-flash-tts", "voice": "Achernar"},
],
)
session = AgentSession(tts=tts, expressive=True, ...)
Server-side fallback is the only option that keeps expressive mode on. Expressive mode requires the session TTS to be an inference.TTS, so wrapping providers in tts.FallbackAdapter disables it.
It is currently unclear to me how we would know that a failure and fallback has happened at all. As far as I can tell, nothing on the agent side reveals it, As far as I am aware:
- The gateway only sends
session.created,output_audio,output_alignment,doneanderror. None of these says which model produced the audio.erroronly arrives when every model has failed. - No
AgentSessionerror event fires when Inference falls back successfully. The Fallback strategies page says "When a fallback is triggered, AgentSession emits an error event", but that does not seem to apply to the Inference Fallback Adapter. - The
tts_nodespan'sgen_ai.request.model,TTSModelUsage.modeland metrics all report the primary model, because they come frominference.TTS._opts.model.
We reproduced this by giving xai/tts-1 a voice xAI rejects. With no fallback configured the request fails (xAI TTS error: ... Voice '...' not found). With an Inworld fallback configured, the session plays audio normally, logs zero TTS errors, and the trace and usage still say xai/tts-1.
We'd like to be able to tell, per request, that a fallback happened and which model served it. That would let us alert on provider outages, attribute cost correctly, and debug voice or quality differences users report. Possible shapes:
- The gateway reports the serving model and voice (for example in
session.createdordone, or as a newfallbackmessage with the failed model and error).inference.TTSthen exposes it. - The
tts_node/tts_requestspans getgen_ai.response.model,lk.fallback.labelandlk.fallback.index, matching whattts.FallbackAdapteralready records via_record_fallback_served. - Usage and metrics (
TTSModelUsage,TTSMetrics) are attributed to the model that served, so per-provider usage is correct. - An
AgentSessionevent (or a non-fatal error event withrecoverable=True) fires when Inference falls back, as the docs describe.
The same would be useful for inference.STT fallbacks.
Related Concern
- Related expressive-mode concern: is ti the case that markup is converted to the primary model's dialect on the client (
markup.convert, keyed on_provider_key()of the primary model) before Inference falls back? A fallback provider therefore receives the primary's native tags, for example[pause]and<soft>…</soft>from xAI sent to Inworld. Without knowing a fallback happened, we can't detect or correct for this either. If Inference reported the serving model, or converted the markup server-side for the provider that actually serves, both problems would be solved.
Workarounds / Alternatives
tts.FallbackAdaptergives this visibility, but it disables expressive mode, so it isn't an option for us.- Checking per-model usage in LiveKit Cloud after the fact, if the dashboard breaks usage down by provider. This doesn't work per session and can't be used for alerting.
Additional Context
- livekit-agents 1.8.2 (Python). The code paths above look the same on current
main(inference/tts.pystill ignores thesession.createdpayload).
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 14.6k
- Forks
- 3.9k
- Merge medio
- 3 d 21 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 197
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de livekit/agents
-
Assistant markup is stripped from chat history when expressive mode is offPosiblemente ocupada @ShivamSharma43 la tomó hace 15 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
docs: openai.LLM vs openai.responses.LLM for HTTP OpenAI-compat hostsQuizá libre de nuevo @AbarnaaSree la tomó hace 55 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
livekit/agents#7022 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Anthropic plugin ignores parallel_tool_calls=False unless tool_choice is also setPosiblemente ocupada @sarankumar1325 la tomó hoy. Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 30/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
OpenAI Realtime engine: expose the WebSocket close code and reason to subclassesPosiblemente ocupada @ninglinLiu la tomó hace 1 día. Abierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de livekit/agents
Issues similares
-
[Resource]: LoreAbiertoresource-submission validation-passed
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
hesreallyhim/awesome-claude-code#3234 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
openminion/openminion#376 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Type: ☹︎ Bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
posit-dev/great-tables#1028 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
integration: apple_tv
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
home-assistant/core#188282 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
A "since" range is worded as a career: "the past two seasons" says "regular season career (2025 on)"AbiertoP4: low
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
jeffknupp/association#538 ·