VSCode format-on-save reflows the shared footer on every page it touches
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 65/100
- Tipo de issue
- Refactorización
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- html, vscode
- Área
- developer-experience, tooling
Línea de trabajo
First, examine the .vscode/settings.json file to understand the current format-on-save configuration. Then, run the provided js-beautify command on a sample HTML file (like coffee.html) to see the changes. The goal is to normalize all footers to be identical, then apply the formatter. After making changes, run pre-commit checks and verify the MegaLinter output to ensure no regressions. The final state should have all shared footer regions byte-identical across pages.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
.vscode/settings.json sets "editor.formatOnSave": true, and VSCode's built-in HTML formatter reformats the whole document, not just the region being edited. So editing any page's copy also rewrites its footer, its social links and its <!-- Scripts --> block: exactly the regions CLAUDE.md requires to stay byte-identical across every page.
It happened in #182. A copy pass over coffee.html reflowed the footer's <li> elements, giving that region a third variant. It was spotted in review and restored by hand before committing, but only because someone was looking.
What the formatter is
VSCode's built-in HTML formatter is js-beautify. Its output is reproducible outside the editor:
npx js-beautify@1 --type html --wrap-line-length 120 --indent-size 2 -f coffee.html
That reproduces VSCode's footer byte for byte. Prettier does not: at --print-width 120 it rewrites about 626 lines of index.html, so whatever shaped this tree, it was not Prettier.
The tree is close to js-beautify's shape already. Running it over every page changes about 460 lines in total, roughly 28 a page, and most of that is the footer.
The catch that decides the approach
js-beautify is idempotent but not convergent. It preserves existing newlines, so it keeps whatever line breaks a file already has rather than imposing its own. Running it a second time changes nothing, but running it over pages whose footers already differ leaves them differing: four distinct footer shapes survive the pass.
So "get VSCode to touch all the footers so they agree" does not work by formatting alone. The footers have to be made identical first; formatting then keeps them that way.
Options
A. Turn format-on-save off for HTML. One line in .vscode/settings.json:
"[html]": { "editor.tabSize": 2, "editor.formatOnSave": false }
No diff, no risk, and manual edits stay exactly as typed. It binds only whoever has this repo's settings, and it means hand-formatting new markup.
B. Normalise once, then let the formatter hold the line. Paste one canonical footer into every page, run the formatter over the tree at fixed settings, commit the result. After that, saving an untouched page is a no-op, and saving an edited page reproduces the canonical footer rather than a new variant. One PR of about 460 lines, and it clears the drift in #185 at the same time.
C. Pin the formatter's settings, whichever of A or B is chosen:
"html.format.wrapLineLength": 120,
"html.format.indentInnerHtml": false
Today those are defaults, so a VSCode version that changes a default silently changes the shape of the tree. Pinning them costs nothing.
Recommendation: B and C, with #185's check as the backstop. An editor setting binds one person on one machine; a CI check that the shared regions are byte-identical is what actually makes this survive. B without that check just resets the clock.
Hazards for whoever does B
- Reformatting HTML moves whitespace between inline elements, and whitespace between inline elements is rendered.
render.ymlwill not catch a stray or missing space. The credit badges are the place to look first: their<span>s sit directly against text with no space in between, andcoffee.htmlhas seven of them. - The formatter's output has to keep MegaLinter green. djlint already reports findings locally that MegaLinter never surfaces (#109), so run
pre-commit run --all-filesand check the MegaLinter run on the PR rather than assuming. - The
<!-- Scripts -->block and theis-loadinggate must come through unchanged: same scripts, same order, sameonerrorattributes.
Related: #185 (the check), #182 (where this surfaced), #109 (djlint).
- Lenguaje dominante
- HTML
- Estrellas
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Merge medio
- 9 h 52 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 59
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Sin guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de laywill/laywill.github.io
-
design
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
laywill/laywill.github.io#186 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
design
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
laywill/laywill.github.io#183 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 Medio día Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
laywill/laywill.github.io#135 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
laywill/laywill.github.io#106 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
infra needs-william
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
laywill/laywill.github.io#35 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de laywill/laywill.github.io
Issues similares
-
Provide a docinit functionaliyAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
objectionary/eolang.sty#167 ·
-
Claiming namespace pierrekinAbiertonamespace operations
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
EclipseFdn/open-vsx.org#13545 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent-research-finding agent-research-recommend chore ready-for-agent
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
jordansmall/spindrift#4068 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
redhat-developer/intellij-quarkus#1626 ·