✅ Improve test coverage and reduce mock dependency
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 28/100
- Tipo de issue
- Refactorización
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Stack tecnológico
- git, javascript
- Área
- testing
Línea de trabajo
Empieza por tests/index.test.js y la sección 5 del informe de análisis de calidad en claudedocs/quality-analysis-report.md para comprender las carencias actuales de mocking y cobertura. Revisa las pruebas existentes de servicios y configuración antes de decidir qué pruebas de errores, casos límite e integración opcional son viables. Se considerará terminado cuando las suites de pruebas acordadas pasen de forma fiable, la cobertura supere el 80 % y la configuración de las pruebas de integración esté documentada en tests/README.md.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Problem
Current test suite has good coverage but relies heavily on mocks, which can hide integration issues. Several critical scenarios are untested.
Current issues:
- Heavy mocking of major functions (
getGitSummary,gptCommit) - Tests validate mock calls rather than actual behavior
- No integration tests with real OpenAI API
- Missing error scenario coverage
- No tests for edge cases
Test Coverage Gaps
1. Missing Error Scenarios
// Currently untested:
❌ OpenAI API errors (rate limits, invalid keys, timeouts)
❌ Config file corruption or invalid JSON
❌ Concurrent access to config file
❌ Network timeout scenarios
❌ Edge cases in git diff parsing (empty files, binary files, huge diffs)
❌ API response validation (malformed responses)
2. Heavy Mocking Issues
Current test pattern (tests/index.test.js):
const result = gitGptCommit.getGitSummary()
expect(result).toBeTruthy()
expect(gitGptCommit.getGitSummary).toHaveBeenCalled() // ⚠️ Only tests mock call
Problem: Tests pass even if actual implementation is broken.
3. No Integration Tests
No tests verify:
- Actual OpenAI API integration
- Real git repository operations
- End-to-end commit workflow
- Config file persistence across runs
Proposed Improvements
1. Add Error Scenario Tests
// tests/error-handling.test.js
describe('Error Handling', () => {
it('should handle OpenAI rate limit errors', async () => {
const mockError = new Error('Rate limit exceeded')
mockError.status = 429
vi.mocked(openai.chat.completions.create).mockRejectedValueOnce(mockError)
await expect(gptCommit()).rejects.toThrow('Rate limit')
})
it('should handle invalid API key errors', async () => {
const mockError = new Error('Invalid API key')
mockError.status = 401
vi.mocked(openai.chat.completions.create).mockRejectedValueOnce(mockError)
await expect(gptCommit()).rejects.toThrow('Invalid API key')
})
it('should handle network timeout errors', async () => {
const mockError = new Error('Network timeout')
mockError.code = 'ETIMEDOUT'
vi.mocked(exec).mockRejectedValueOnce(mockError)
await expect(getGitSummary()).rejects.toThrow('Network')
})
it('should handle corrupted config file', () => {
fs.writeFileSync(CONFIG_FILE, 'invalid json {{{')
expect(() => loadConfig()).not.toThrow()
expect(model).toBe('gpt-5-mini') // Should use default
})
})
2. Add Integration Tests (Optional)
// tests/integration/openai.integration.test.js
describe('OpenAI Integration', () => {
// Only runs if OPENAI_API_KEY is set
const skipIfNoApiKey = process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY ? test : test.skip
skipIfNoApiKey('should generate valid commit messages', async () => {
const testDiff = fs.readFileSync('fixtures/sample-diff.txt', 'utf8')
// Use real OpenAI API
const message = await generateCommitMessage(testDiff)
expect(message).toBeDefined()
expect(message.length).toBeGreaterThan(10)
expect(message.length).toBeLessThan(200)
}, 10000) // 10s timeout for API call
skipIfNoApiKey('should respect language setting', async () => {
const testDiff = 'diff --git a/file.js...'
const englishMessage = await generateCommitMessage(testDiff, 'English')
const japaneseMessage = await generateCommitMessage(testDiff, '日本語')
// Basic validation that language is respected
expect(japaneseMessage).toMatch(/[\u3000-\u303f\u3040-\u309f\u30a0-\u30ff]/)
}, 10000)
})
3. Add Edge Case Tests
// tests/edge-cases.test.js
describe('Edge Cases', () => {
it('should handle empty git diff', async () => {
vi.mocked(exec).mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '' })
const result = await getGitSummary()
expect(result).toBeNull()
})
it('should handle huge git diff', async () => {
const hugeDiff = 'diff --git...\n'.repeat(10000) // Very large diff
vi.mocked(exec).mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: hugeDiff })
// Should validate size and possibly warn or truncate
await expect(getGitSummary()).rejects.toThrow('too large')
})
it('should handle binary file diffs', async () => {
const binaryDiff = 'Binary files differ\n'
vi.mocked(exec).mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: binaryDiff })
const result = await getGitSummary()
expect(result).toBeDefined()
})
it('should handle diff with sensitive data patterns', async () => {
const sensitiveDiff = 'diff --git\n+const API_KEY = "secret123"'
vi.mocked(exec).mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: sensitiveDiff })
// Should warn user about sensitive data
const consoleSpy = vi.spyOn(console, 'warn')
await getGitSummary()
expect(consoleSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('sensitive'))
})
})
4. Reduce Mocking in Core Tests
// tests/sanitization.test.js - Good example (no mocks)
describe('sanitizeCommitMessage', () => {
it('should remove dangerous characters', () => {
const input = 'feat: add feature!@#$%^&*()'
const output = sanitizeCommitMessage(input)
expect(output).toBe('feat: add feature')
})
})
// tests/services/GitService.test.js - Test real logic
describe('GitService', () => {
it('should construct correct git diff command', () => {
const service = new GitService()
const command = service.buildDiffCommand()
expect(command).toContain('git diff --cached')
expect(command).toContain(':(exclude)*lock.json')
})
})
Test Organization
tests/
├─ unit/ # Pure unit tests (no mocks)
│ ├─ utils/
│ │ └─ sanitize.test.js
│ ├─ services/
│ │ ├─ OpenAIService.test.js
│ │ ├─ GitService.test.js
│ │ └─ ConfigService.test.js
│ └─ validators.test.js
├─ integration/ # Integration tests (optional)
│ ├─ openai.integration.test.js
│ └─ e2e.integration.test.js
├─ error-scenarios/ # Error handling tests
│ ├─ api-errors.test.js
│ ├─ config-errors.test.js
│ └─ network-errors.test.js
└─ edge-cases/ # Edge case tests
├─ large-diffs.test.js
├─ binary-files.test.js
└─ sensitive-data.test.js
Benefits
- ✅ Better confidence in code correctness
- ✅ Catch integration issues before production
- ✅ Validate error handling actually works
- ✅ Reduce false confidence from mocks
- ✅ Better regression prevention
Acceptance Criteria
- Add error scenario test suite (10+ tests)
- Add edge case test suite (10+ tests)
- Optional: Add integration test suite (gated by env var)
- Reduce mocking in existing tests where possible
- Achieve >80% code coverage
- All tests pass reliably
- Document how to run integration tests
Priority
Medium-High - Prevents bugs from reaching users
Related
Quality analysis report: claudedocs/quality-analysis-report.md section 5
Notes
- Integration tests should be optional (gated by
OPENAI_API_KEYenv var) - Consider using fixtures for consistent test data
- Add test timeout configurations for API calls
- Document test organization in tests/README.md
- Lenguaje dominante
- JavaScript
- Estrellas
- 36
- Forks
- 3
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de laststance/git-gpt-commit
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 20/100
laststance/git-gpt-commit#76 ·
-
fix error with giant diffAbierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
laststance/git-gpt-commit#75 ·
-
enhancement low-priority performance
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
laststance/git-gpt-commit#72 ·
-
enhancement low-priority standards
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
laststance/git-gpt-commit#70 ·
-
documentation good first issue medium-priority
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
laststance/git-gpt-commit#69 ·
Todos los issues de laststance/git-gpt-commit
Issues similares
-
Create a theming guideAbiertodocumentation good first issue theming
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
-
Optimize the quick add featureAbiertofeature
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
drevendev/PatchPitch#2 ·
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
521xueweihan/HelloGitHub#4025 ·