feat: system coverage, deploy verdicts and incidents
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- go
Línea de trabajo
Start with the existing System overview dashboard, deploy markers and split, alert rules, webhook delivery, and email sending described in the issue. Then trace how Fanout accepts and processes OpenTelemetry data, and review the Collector receiver and CI/CD semantic convention details referenced here. Done means the database, queue, and TLS panels, deploy verdicts, panel alerts, incidents, and email delivery work end to end as listed; the issue says each part ships separately.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Goal
Fanout becomes the one place to see a whole system and act on what goes wrong in it. It keeps doing only what it does today — accept OpenTelemetry data and do everything after that — and builds on what already exists: the System overview default dashboard, deploy markers and the deploy split, alert rules with webhook delivery, and Fanout's email sending.
Principle
The boundary is the input, not the feature set. Telemetry arrives only as OpenTelemetry, a standard, so anything that sends OTLP works without a Fanout integration. On top of that data Fanout should be rich and full-featured: dashboards, analysis, alerts, deploy verdicts and incidents all belong here.
1. More of the system on System overview
Recognise standard Collector receiver output and present it, with no per-source integration in Fanout:
- Databases and queues from the
postgresql,mysql,redisandkafkametricsreceivers: connections, slow or failed queries, replication lag, consumer lag. Panels appear when their data exists and their descriptions name the receiver otherwise. - TLS certificate expiry from the
tlscheckreceiver: days until expiry per endpoint, bad when close. - The Send telemetry guide gains the receiver configuration for each.
2. Know what changed, and whether it broke something
- Real change events. Accept deploys and pipeline runs that arrive as OpenTelemetry data (the CI/CD semantic conventions, or the Collector's
githubreceiver) and draw them as deploy markers, alongside today's markers inferred from a newservice.version. - A verdict for each deploy — pass, fail or inconclusive — from the existing before-and-after deploy split, shown on the marker and in the System overview versions table.
3. Act on problems: incidents on top of alerts
- Alerts on dashboard panels, so a System overview panel turning bad (a filesystem above 90%, a host not reporting, a check with no recent result) can fire. Today alert rules see only per-service span and log rollups.
- Incidents: a firing alert opens one, with acknowledgement, an owner, and a timeline that includes nearby deploys; it is recovered only once the alert has stayed resolved.
- Email notifications next to webhooks, using the email sending Fanout already has.
Out of scope
Performance work (a scale benchmark, per-minute summaries, faster metric queries), AI and API cost tracking, and checks run by Fanout itself — Fanout does not gather or probe.
Done when
- A Collector with the receivers above produces database, queue and TLS-expiry panels on System overview, verified end to end through OTLP.
- A deploy event arriving as OpenTelemetry data appears as a marker with a pass, fail or inconclusive verdict.
- A panel-based alert opens an incident, it can be acknowledged and assigned, and it closes only after recovery holds; email and webhook delivery both work.
Each part ships on its own, in this order.
- Lenguaje dominante
- HTML
- Estrellas
- 6
- Forks
- 0
- Merge medio
- 2 h 25 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 25
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de labstack/fanout
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 42/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de labstack/fanout
Issues similares
-
Notifications pagination accepts NaN and negative LIMIT/OFFSETPosiblemente ocupada @Senthil455 la tomó hoy. AbiertoBUGS MEDIUM
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
elixpo/blogs.elixpo#419 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Bug]: agent_final_response still returns the abandoned branch's answer after navigate moves HEAD backPosiblemente ocupada @enyst la tomó hoy. Abiertobug priority:low ready-for-dev
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
OpenHands/software-agent-sdk#5822 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area: server enhancement good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
scs0209/laya-guard#52 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
priority:high
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100