New skill: issue_prioritization_workflow, prioritize issues with a coding agent and GitHub Projects or GitLab
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- github, gitlab
- Área
- devtools
Línea de trabajo
Read the first comment for the full process summarized by the issue, then inspect the existing bug_triage_workflow skill to understand the project’s skill conventions. Define how the skill handles the listed open questions about GitHub Projects, GitLab, objectives, scoring, and queue size; done means a SKILL.md for issue_prioritization_workflow that proposes priorities and a ranked Ready queue for approval before updating a board.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Goal
Create a new skill, with its instructions in SKILL.md, that lets a coding agent prioritize the open issues of a repository and keep that priority order in the project board of the issue tracker.
- The coding agent estimates the impact, the urgency, and the effort of each open issue, and finds the dependencies and the blockers between issues.
- The coding agent proposes a priority level (P0, P1, P2, P3) and an explicitly ranked Ready queue, and explains each choice in one or two sentences.
- The developer approves the proposed priorities and the proposed ranking before the coding agent changes any issue or any project board.
- The coding agent writes the approved priorities and the approved ranking to GitHub Projects, or to the equivalent feature in GitLab.
- The developer can run the skill again whenever the objectives change, or once a week, to keep the priority order current.
The full process is summarized in the first comment of this issue.
Proposed name
issue_prioritization_workflow
Proposed description
Prioritize the open issues of a repository and keep a ranked Ready queue in GitHub Projects or in the equivalent feature in GitLab. Use when the developer asks which issue to work on next, asks to assign priorities, or asks to update the project board. Propose every priority and every ranking first, and change issues or project boards only after the developer approves.
Open questions
- Which GitLab feature is the equivalent of GitHub Projects: issue boards with scoped labels (for example
priority::1), the issue weight field for the effort, or epics? Do these features need a paid GitLab tier? - Where does the skill store the priority level and the effort in a personal GitHub repository: in custom fields of GitHub Projects, or in labels? Does the native Priority field and the native Effort field of GitHub issues apply only to organization repositories?
- How does the skill store the explicit ranking of the Ready queue: the item order of a GitHub Projects view, a number field, or a pinned issue that lists the queue?
- Does the skill use the
ghcommand line and theglabcommand line, or a Model Context Protocol server for GitHub and for GitLab? - How does the skill learn the current objectives of the project: from the developer in the conversation, from a file in the repository, or from a milestone?
- Does the skill keep the formula
Score = (Impact × Urgency) / Effort, or only use the three estimates as input for the judgment of the coding agent? - How does this skill relate to the existing
bug_triage_workflowskill: does the new skill replace it, call it, or stay separate and cover all issue types? - What is the maximum size of the Ready queue: ten issues, as the source suggests, or a number that the developer chooses?
Source
- Lenguaje dominante
- Sin datos de lenguaje
- Estrellas
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Merge medio
- 10 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 11
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de jeromeetienne/coding_agent_plugin
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
jeromeetienne/coding_agent_plugin#29 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 64/100
jeromeetienne/coding_agent_plugin#7 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 3/5 Medio día Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
jeromeetienne/coding_agent_plugin#26 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
jeromeetienne/coding_agent_plugin#25 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
jeromeetienne/coding_agent_plugin#19 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de jeromeetienne/coding_agent_plugin
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug documentation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
cqframework/vscode-cql#198 ·
-
bug documentation good first issue help wanted testing
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Show evidence time and supersede warnings in the memory inspectorPosiblemente ocupada @Sinchanak-212 la tomó hoy. Abiertoarea: ux good first issue priority: medium
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
rohit746/pdf-view.nvim#109 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día