[C API] `svs_index_search_topk`: document the filtered-search contract for `filter_rate() <= 0`
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 5 días
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 65/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- cpp
- Área
- backend-api-design
Línea de trabajo
Start with bindings/c/src/filtered_search.hpp and the filter_rate contract in svs_c.h; trace both early-exit sites described in the issue. Then inspect bindings/c/tests/ for the relevant search tests. Done means the tests cover both early exits and verify partial results, while the header documents the contract and the TODO is resolved.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
Please document what svs_index_search_topk does with an ID filter whose filter_rate() is <= 0 (or NULL). valkey-search relies on this behaviour, and the header doesn't state it.
The contract text in svs_c.h (lines 1297-1303 at 8285340) only covers filter_rate > 0.0: "If the actual observed filter hit rate is less than the provided filter_rate value, the function returns an empty result set." It says nothing about 0.0.
Current behaviour for filter_rate() <= 0
Code references are to main at 8285340.
estimate_initial_batch_size(bindings/c/src/filtered_search.hpp:92-97) skips the ID sampling and returns the batch hint, so the pre-search early exit (:185-190) cannot trigger.hit_rate_sufficient(:65-69) returns true forfilter_rate <= 0, so the in-loop exit that resetsfound = 0(:218-222) cannot trigger either.- The search therefore runs until
kfilter-passing hits are found or the batch iterator is exhausted, and returns the hits found. That can be fewer thank, and is reported per query throughoffsets/total_results.
Ask
- Document the above in
svs_c.hnext to the existingfilter_rate > 0.0text, so it becomes part of the contract:- no sampling, and no early exit on the observed hit rate;
- the hits found are returned, possibly fewer than
k.
- Resolve the TODO at
filtered_search.hpp:216-217for the<= 0case. A short comment stating the guarantee is enough. - Add a test in
bindings/c/tests/asserting that, withfilter_rate()returning0.0and a selective filter, a query returns a non-zero number of hits, all of which pass the filter.
No behaviour change is requested. Whether the positive-hint path should return partial results, or drop the ID sampling, is SVS's call. If it does change, an opt-in parameter that keeps today's default would avoid surprising other integrations.
Consumer context
valkey-search (ALGORITHM SVS_VAMANA) passes an ID filter built from query predicates and returns 0.0 from filter_rate. Its query planner already knows how many keys qualify before it calls SVS:
- very selective filters (below roughly
0.001 * Nqualifying keys) go to an exact brute-force path and never reach SVS; - for the rest, valkey-search sizes the first batch itself through the per-query search window (
batch_hint = max(k, search_window_size)inbindings/c/src/index_vamana.cpp).
So valkey-search needs SVS to do no sampling or selectivity estimation, only to keep the <= 0 behaviour stable.
Scope change
This issue originally asked for partial results when the observed hit rate falls below a positive filter_rate. After the discussion below, valkey-search will handle selectivity on its own side, so the ask is narrowed to documenting the <= 0 contract. The ID sampler referenced in the original text has moved to bindings/c/src/index_vamana.cpp (around lines 78 and 140).
- Lenguaje dominante
- C++
- Estrellas
- 241
- Forks
- 48
- Merge medio
- 4 d 21 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 11
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de intel/ScalableVectorSearch
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
intel/ScalableVectorSearch#356 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 5 días
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 42/100
intel/ScalableVectorSearch#469 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 5 días
-
Add CI test for C API on ARMAbiertoenhancement
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 32/100
intel/ScalableVectorSearch#460 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 5 días
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
intel/ScalableVectorSearch#438 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 5 días
-
CI: tier the test matrix into PR / main / nightly to cut Actions minutesPosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abierto
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 32/100
intel/ScalableVectorSearch#432 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 5 días
Todos los issues de intel/ScalableVectorSearch
Issues similares
-
runtime: lf_f128_mod is documented as fmodq (truncating) but implements floor-based modulo; unusedAbiertointernal correctness low priority rt_lib
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 87/100
-
PriorityNotificationQueue::wakeUpAll() loses the wake-up for a thread that is not waiting yetPosiblemente ocupada @matejk la tomó hoy. Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
pocoproject/poco#5674 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
bug docs GUI
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
sonic-pi-net/sonic-pi#3609 ·
-
Unreachable code warningAbiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
SanderMertens/flecs#2395 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día