[Bug] 2-networking-a-fedramp: the NVA return routes still omit the proxy-only subnets, so traffic from a regional managed load balancer's proxies cannot get replies from the internet
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 70/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- gcp, terraform
- Área
- infrastructure, networking
Línea de trabajo
Empieza con la entrada landing de local.routing_config en fast/stages-aw/2-networking-a-fedramp/nva.tf, que construye las rutas solo a partir de var.subnets, y compárala con subnets_proxy_only en branch-net-envs.tf y var.proxy_subnets en variables.tf. Está terminado cuando el CIDR proxy-only de cada entorno se incluye en las rutas de landing y la cloud-config del invitado NVA en modules/cloud-config-container/simple-nva/cloud-config.yaml lo recibe.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Bug Description
PR #269 (closing #146) builds the NVAs' trusted-side return routes from every tenant subnet of every environment. The proxy-only subnet that branch-net-envs.tf creates in each environment spoke (subnets_proxy_only, CIDR from var.proxy_subnets[<env>], name proxy-<regions.primary>) is still not among them: the landing entry of local.routing_config in nva.tf reads var.subnets only (if s.tenant != null), and nva.tf never references var.proxy_subnets.
The spokes have their default routes deleted (delete_default_routes_on_create = true) and reach the internet through the default-route-nva route (0.0.0.0/0 → the NVA internal load balancer) and Cloud NAT on the DMZ VPC. A regional managed load balancer in a spoke — for example a regional internal Application Load Balancer whose backend is a regional internet NEG, which is how blueprints/gemini-enterprise reaches the Google-hosted Gemini Enterprise endpoint (gemini-stage-0/network.tf: an INTERNET_FQDN_PORT NEG for vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com) — originates its backend connections from the Envoy proxies in that spoke's proxy-only subnet. Those packets leave through the NVA and are masqueraded on the DMZ interface. The reply comes back to the NVA, is un-NATed to the proxy-only address, and — because the guest has no route for that range on the landing interface (simple-nva's cloud-config adds ip route add <cidr> via <eth1 gateway> only for the listed routes) — follows the VM's default route back out the untrusted interface. The connection hangs and times out; nothing errors at apply time, and DNS keeps resolving, so it reads as a firewall or DNS problem.
Environment and Deployment Context
- Stellar Engine Version/Commit:
v5.2.0(82153050); unchanged onmain@e2396049(2026-11-01).fast/stages-aw/2-networking-a-fedramp/nva.tflines 28-37 (thelandingroutes),branch-net-envs.tflines 114-119 (subnets_proxy_only;delete_default_routes_on_createat line 107),variables.tflines 257-268 (proxy_subnets, one entry required perenvs_folderskey),modules/cloud-config-container/simple-nva/cloud-config.yamllines 57-59 (guest routes only for the listed CIDRs). - Deployment Type:
- US Region Restricted (e.g., Access Policy constraint)
- FedRAMP Moderate
- FedRAMP High
- DoD IL4
- DoD IL5
- Stand-alone / Custom
- FAST Stage (if applicable):
2-networking-a-fedramp
Steps to Reproduce
- Deploy Stages 0-2 with
2-networking-a-fedrampatv5.2.0, withproxy_subnetsset for each environment (required by the variable's validation). - In a spoke, deploy a regional managed load balancer whose backend is a regional internet NEG (for example
gemini-stage-0andgemini-stage-1with the internal deployment type). - Send a request to the load balancer from a client in the spoke.
- On an NVA:
ip route get <an address in the proxy-only CIDR>shows the route viaeth0(the DMZ side), noteth1.
Expected Behavior
Every subnet whose egress is routed through the NVAs — tenant subnets and proxy-only subnets — gets a trusted-side return route, so replies to the load balancer's proxies are delivered.
Actual Behavior
Replies to the proxy-only range leave the NVA on the untrusted side; the load balancer's backend connections time out.
Relevant Logs and Errors
None at deploy time: the plan and apply succeed. The symptom is the request hanging at the load balancer.
Additional Context
- Suggested fix — add each environment's proxy-only CIDR to the
landingroutes:
(routes = flatten([ for k, v in var.envs_folders : concat( [for s in try(var.subnets[lower(k)], []) : module.env-spoke-vpc[k].subnets["${s.region}/${s.name}"].ip_cidr_range if s.tenant != null], [var.proxy_subnets[k]] ) ])var.proxy_subnetsis keyed by theenvs_folderskey itself, not its lower-cased form, and its validation already guarantees an entry for every environment.) - #146 reported the tenant-subnet half; it did not mention the proxy-only subnets, which is why #269 did not cover them.
- Lenguaje dominante
- HCL
- Estrellas
- 61
- Forks
- 28
- Merge medio
- 1 d 17 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 75
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de google/stellar-engine
-
Documentation Level of Effort - Low Priority - Medium
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
google/stellar-engine#397 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Documentation] 0-bootstrap: document Google producer organization ID inline for compute.restrictVpcPeeringPosiblemente ocupada @Hariharan18092006 la tomó hace 3 días. AbiertoDocumentation Level of Effort - Low Priority - Low Scope - Fast
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
google/stellar-engine#385 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Enhancement Framework - FedRAMP High Level of Effort - Low Priority - Medium Scope - Blueprint Scope - Module
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
google/stellar-engine#320 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Feature Request] Gemini Enterprise CMEK index pre-warming, companion seed data store, declarative CmekConfig, and readiness probePosiblemente ocupada @Calvin-Cheng1 la tomó hace 5 días. AbiertoEnhancement Gemini - Enterprise Gemini - Government Level of Effort - Medium Priority - High Scope - Blueprint Scope - Fast
google/stellar-engine#390 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Feature Request] Support regulated and non-regulated multi-tenancy within a single GCP OrganizationAbiertoEnhancement
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
google/stellar-engine#388 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de google/stellar-engine
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
FAIRmat-NFDI/nomad-distro-dev#161 ·
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 60/100
Netcracker/qubership-workflow-hub#1048 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug priority-p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
feat: expose annotations/labels pass-through for ClickHouse/Keeper (spec.annotations / spec.labels)Abiertofeature infra
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
langfuse/langfuse-k8s#467 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
lidofinance/lido-keys-api#387 ·