Can't Diff and Port same named executables at the same time
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Stack tecnológico
- java
- Área
- reverse-engineering
Línea de trabajo
Comienza reproduciendo el fallo con dos sesiones simultáneas de BinDiff usando IDBs con el mismo nombre, siguiendo el flujo de trabajo de diff y port descrito en Windows con IDA 7.5 o 7.6. Rastrea cómo BinExport, BinDiff y la base de datos temporal compartida nombran sus archivos y aísla el punto de colisión. Se considera completado cuando dos operaciones simultáneas de diff-and-port finalizan sin errores ni corrupción.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Do to the way Binexport and/or Bindiff names it's temp files, you can not successfully do more than one diff and/or port at the same time.
The problem is because the tools use the same temp folder and the temp DBs that are created have the same names since they use the the original base name of the executable. Plus a common/global DB named "temporary.database" is already in use.
Example session for the IDB name problem:
If you made an IDB of an executable named "foobar.exe" and saved it "foobar_a.exe.i64" and another of the same named exe (from an update or something) "foobar_b.exe.i64" the tools will name them all "foobar.BinExport" since the tools name these internally based on the base name.
Normally not a problem for a single IDB operation since the DB files are separated path structure "BinDiff\primary" and "BinDiff\secondary". But if you open one more additional sessions (different "ida64.exe" processes) with "foobar_aa.exe.i64" and "foobar_bb.exe.i64" now the conflict exists because these names are taken plus "temporary.database" is already used.
Steps to reproduce the problem:
- The normal modus operandi, BinDiff an older executable with a new then port symbols and comments using the port feature. But attempting to do more than one at the same time.
What is the expected behavior?
Expected to be able to Diff and port two different IDA IDBs at the same time on the same machine.
What went wrong?
At least the port feature will fail when it is started, and probably results in diff corruption.
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
"BinDiff 7 (latest version, updated)", IDA 7.6 and IDA 7.5 on Windows 10 21h1
Any other comments?
As a solution, consider adding a top level root folder called "Session438" or something where the "438" number is the PID of the host "ida64.exe". An easy way to serialize the the folder structure with a UUID.
Ported from b/200299139
- Lenguaje dominante
- Java
- Estrellas
- 3.2k
- Forks
- 240
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de google/bindiff
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
question
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 42/100
-
ida pro 9.1 i64 db diff fails Abierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
-
[Bug] Error when build Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
-
[Bug] Protobuf message size limit of 2GB exceeded during final stage of diffing large binaries Abierto
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 15/100
Todos los issues de google/bindiff
Issues similares
-
certification
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 80/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
-
[BUG] ECR GetAuthorizationToken returns a proxyEndpoint for the default region, not the request's Abiertobug ecr
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
-
Needs: Triage Type: Feature request
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
AntennaPod/AntennaPod#8794 ·
-
agentic-workflows
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
github/copilot-sdk#2760 ·