[curriculum-eval] 04-github-actions-intro.md: cognitive_load — redundant term repetition inflates concept count to 28
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 1/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Menos de una hora
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 90/100
- Tipo de issue
- Documentación
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- github-actions
- Área
- documentation
Línea de trabajo
Abre workshop/04-github-actions-intro.md y lee el ejercicio “Label a sample workflow” con su bloque “Reveal the labels”. Conserva las cinco líneas de instrucciones, acorta las respuestas de la revelación a términos numerados sin repetir el YAML y añade el elemento de la lista de comprobación. Está hecho cuando las secciones “Try It” y “Checkpoint” permanecen sin cambios y el ejercicio ya no repite cada fragmento.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
File: workshop/04-github-actions-intro.md
Overall Score: 5.39 / 10.0 (corpus mean: 6.09)
Corrected Overall Score (after fixing the checkpoint/scaffolding regex bug reported separately): 8.14 / 10.0 — cognitive_load remains the residual gap.
Flagged Dimensions:
| Dimension | Score | Benchmark | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| cognitive_load | 6.8 |
≤15 new concepts | -3.2 (28 detected concept terms vs. 15 ideal) |
| active_learning | 3.9 |
density ≥ 3 | -2.1 (density 1.19) |
Root Cause (≤ 2 sentences):
The concept-density scorer flags 28 distinct bold/code terms — driven largely by the "Label a sample workflow" exercise, which repeats each YAML term (on:, jobs:, runs-on:, uses:, run:) twice: once inline in code and again as a labeled answer in the reveal block, effectively double-counting the same five core Actions primitives as separate concepts.
Evidence (quoted from the file):
"Write a label beside each line:
on: [push]test:(the job name underjobs:)runs-on: ubuntu-latestuses: actions/checkout@v4run: echo "All checks passed""
Followed immediately by an equivalent second listing in the "Reveal the labels" <details> block — the same five terms restated, which the concept counter treats as additional new vocabulary.
Learning Science Rationale:
Sweller's Cognitive Load Theory distinguishes intrinsic load (task complexity) from extraneous load (how the material is presented). Here the intrinsic complexity is low — five primitives — but redundant restatement of identical terms in two adjacent blocks likely inflates measured concept count without adding new schema for the learner, an example of the redundancy effect, where repeating already-processed information in a new format increases apparent load rather than reinforcing learning.
Improvement Prompt (for an agent):
In workshop/04-github-actions-intro.md, reduce redundant terminology repetition in the "Label a sample workflow" exercise:
1. In the code block under "Label a sample workflow", keep the five numbered lines as-is (this is the active-recall prompt).
2. In the "Reveal the labels" <details> block, shorten each answer line to just "→ **term**" without re-quoting the full YAML snippet, since the snippet is already visible above. For example, change:
"- `on: [push]` → **trigger** (when this workflow runs)"
to:
"1. **trigger** — the event that starts the workflow"
keeping the numbering aligned with the exercise list above it, so learners aren't shown the same code fragment twice.
3. Add one short interactive checklist item to the exercise itself (e.g., "- [ ] I labeled all 5 lines before revealing the answer") to raise activity_density, since this file currently averages fewer than 4 activity units per 100 words.
Do not remove the Try It real-workflow exploration section or the Checkpoint section.
Expected Score After Fix: ≈8.6 / 10.0 (concept overload reduced from ~28 to ~18-20 detected terms; activity_density raised slightly by the added checklist item, combined with the companion checkpoint/scaffolding regex fix).
Generated by 🔬 Curriculum Quality Evaluator · copilot · auto · 147.3 AIC · ⌖ 18.6 AIC · ⊞ 9K · ◷
- expires on Sep 28, 2026, 9:51 AM UTC
- Lenguaje dominante
- JavaScript
- Estrellas
- 49
- Forks
- 20
- Merge medio
- 7 h 12 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 26
Preparar el entorno
Aún no hemos revisado los archivos de configuración de este proyecto. Empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de githubnext/gh-aw-workshop
-
[aw] Upgrade availableAbiertoagentic-workflows
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#3933 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#3932 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
feedback simulation workshop
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#3931 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agentic-workflows documentation workflow-editor
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#3927 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#3926 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de githubnext/gh-aw-workshop
Issues similares
-
Design only Leadership Survey SLFS
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
bcgov/digital-journeys#2293 ·
-
Toolkit
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
API Bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
ProjectSidewalk/SidewalkWebpage#5556 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
jessepollak/home#1454 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability untriaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 64/100
opensearch-project/OpenSearch-Dashboards#12822 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día