[Extension]: Update AEE catalog entry to v1.4.0
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 1/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Menos de una hora
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 75/100
Línea de trabajo
Actualiza la entrada existente de AEE en el catálogo de extensiones de v1.2.0 a v1.4.0, usando la entrada propuesta del catálogo como fuente para sus campos. Primero, inspecciona la entrada actual del catálogo y sus reglas de validación. Mantén spec-kit-evaluator como obligatorio, establece la versión actualizada, los requisitos y el recuento de comandos, y confirma que el catálogo acepta la entrada.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Extension ID
aee
Extension Name
Applied Epistemic Engineering
Version
1.4.0
Description
Checks the claims in a spec-driven project against their evidence at every stage, and shows plainly what is verified, what is not, and what remains not understood.
Author
ElectroHire
Repository URL
https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee
Download URL
https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/archive/refs/tags/v1.4.0.zip
License
MIT
Homepage (optional)
https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee
Documentation URL (optional)
https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee#readme
Changelog URL (optional)
https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
Required Spec Kit Version
=1.0.0,<2
Required Tools (optional)
- python (>=3.11) — required
- aee CLI — the Applied Epistemic Engineering engine (>=1.5.0,<2), installed from PyPI as
applied-epistemic-engineering; 1.5.0 is the realigned engine (claim life-cycle stages, stage-capped reported statuses, lane-paired outcomes,not_understood) and the runner refuses an out-of-range engine at startup — required - spec-kit-evaluator (>=1.0.0,<2) — Spec Kit extension implementing the Evaluator Contract — required companion: AEE is one evaluator among many, and its results are composed through this common evaluator so every evaluator's output is handled the same way; the runner's
assessrefuses (exit 2) when it is not installed in the project - rtk — optional token-economy tool; every workflow degrades gracefully when it is absent
- headroom — optional token-economy tool; every workflow degrades gracefully when it is absent
- token-router — optional token-economy tool; every workflow degrades gracefully when it is absent
- ollama — optional; used only by the optional token-economy routing
Number of Commands
10 (speckit.aee.draft-claims, speckit.aee.assess, speckit.aee.challenge, speckit.aee.trace, speckit.aee.verify, speckit.aee.gate, speckit.aee.review, speckit.aee.gaps, speckit.aee.route-evidence, speckit.aee.report-savings)
Number of Hooks (optional)
5 (after_specify, after_plan, after_tasks, after_implement, after_verify)
Tags
epistemics, evidence, provenance, uncertainty, governance
Key Features
- Draft atomic claims from a spec's requirements for human ratification; drafts are born
draftand are never upgraded by the tool (new command in 1.3.0) - Assess claims against their evidence and show, for each claim, the life-cycle stage it has actually reached — created, checked, explained, accepted, digested — with reported status capped by that stage
- Ships as one system with the common Evaluator extension (a required companion): AEE's results are composed through it, so every evaluator's output is handled consistently rather than by each tool's own choice
- Report machine verification and human acceptance side by side as a pair, never merged into one number, plus a plain statement of what remains not understood
- Challenge claims on atomicity, boundaries, falsifiability, dependencies, and evidence independence
- Attach policy gates to assessment: per-claim accept / challenge / abstain verdicts with corroboration and forced-abstention rules, and measured per-source reliability blended into scoring
- Render the claim dependency graph and inspect where each claim's support comes from
- Verify the tamper-evident evidence ledger, without claiming that its contents are true
- Apply a CI-friendly decision gate to an assessment
- Diff two assessments into a materiality-filtered review queue (speckit.aee.review)
- Generate and update the gap register from a verification matrix and test evidence
- Route oversized evidence into raw slices for the gates, with token-savings figures that are measured, never estimated
Testing Checklist
- Extension installs successfully via download URL
- All commands execute without errors
- Documentation is complete and accurate
- No security vulnerabilities identified
- Tested on at least one real project
Submission Requirements
- Valid
extension.ymlmanifest included - README.md with installation and usage instructions
- LICENSE file included
- GitHub release created with version tag
- All command files exist and are properly formatted
- Extension ID follows naming conventions (lowercase-with-hyphens)
Testing Details
Install test: the v1.4.0 archive was installed from the download URL itself into a fresh Spec Kit project and exercised both ways the pair can be installed: with the Evaluator extension present, assess runs and emits its Evaluator Contract result for composition; with the Evaluator extension absent, assess refuses with exit 2, names the missing extension and how to install it, and writes nothing. The archive itself was also downloaded and parsed directly: its extension.yml reads id aee, version 1.4.0, spec-kit-evaluator declared required: true at >=1.0.0,<2, 10 command files under commands/, 5 hooks, README.md and LICENSE at the root.
Test suite: the extension repository's suite passes against the real AEE engine 1.5.0, and check_install.py now exercises the evaluator-missing refusal end to end (Evaluator extension removed → assess exits 2 naming it); the release PR's CI was green on the repository's protected main.
What changed in v1.4.0 vs v1.3.0: one design correction (the repository's specs/005-evaluator-required). In 1.3.0 the Evaluator extension was declared optional and only the contract was required, which made consistent handling of evaluator results a choice each project could skip. In 1.4.0 the Evaluator extension is a required companion — declared required: true in extension.yml and enforced by the runner — because AEE is one evaluator among many by design, and its results are composed through the common evaluator so every evaluator's output is handled the same way. The pair is one system. Nothing else changed: same 10 commands, same engine floor (>=1.5.0,<2), same Spec Kit range (>=1.0.0,<2).
Example Usage
# Install the engine the extension drives
python -m pip install "applied-epistemic-engineering>=1.5.0,<2"
# Install the extension pair (the Evaluator extension is a required companion)
specify extension add aee --from https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/archive/refs/tags/v1.4.0.zip
specify extension add evaluator --from https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-evaluator/archive/refs/tags/v1.1.0.zip
# Draft ratifiable claims from your spec, then assess them
/speckit.aee.draft-claims
/speckit.aee.assess phase=after_specify artifact=specs/001-search/spec.md
Proposed Catalog Entry
{
"aee": {
"name": "Applied Epistemic Engineering",
"id": "aee",
"description": "Checks the claims in a spec-driven project against their evidence at every stage, and shows plainly what is verified, what is not, and what remains not understood.",
"author": "ElectroHire",
"version": "1.4.0",
"download_url": "https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/archive/refs/tags/v1.4.0.zip",
"repository": "https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee",
"homepage": "https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee",
"documentation": "https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee#readme",
"changelog": "https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md",
"license": "MIT",
"category": "process",
"effect": "read-write",
"requires": {
"speckit_version": ">=1.0.0,<2",
"tools": [
{ "name": "python", "version": ">=3.11", "required": true },
{ "name": "aee", "version": ">=1.5.0,<2", "required": true },
{ "name": "spec-kit-evaluator", "version": ">=1.0.0,<2", "required": true },
{ "name": "rtk", "required": false },
{ "name": "headroom", "required": false },
{ "name": "token-router", "required": false },
{ "name": "ollama", "required": false }
]
},
"provides": {
"commands": 10,
"hooks": 5
},
"tags": ["epistemics", "evidence", "provenance", "uncertainty", "governance"],
"verified": false,
"downloads": 0,
"stars": 0,
"created_at": "2026-09-15T00:00:00Z",
"updated_at": "2026-10-12T00:00:00Z"
}
}
Additional Context
Note for maintainers: this updates the existing catalog entry for the AEE extension (v1.2.0 → v1.4.0). It supersedes #4935 (the v1.3.0 update filed earlier today), which was closed unvalidated after a design correction shipped as v1.4.0; the v1.2.0 update was #4890 (merged via PR #4895). It is not a duplicate.
What changed in the entry, so the diff is easy to review:
- Version 1.2.0 → 1.4.0; commands 9 → 10 (adds
speckit.aee.draft-claims, shipped in 1.3.0); hooks unchanged at 5. requires.speckit_version>=1.0.0→>=1.0.0,<2, matching the releasedextension.yml.aeeengine floor>=1.4.0,<2→>=1.5.0,<2. Engine 1.5.0 is the realigned engine (life-cycle stages, stage-capped reported statuses, lane-paired outcomes,not_understood); the extension's runner refuses an out-of-range engine at startup rather than scoring with it.spec-kit-evaluatorstaysrequired: true— the same value the current (v1.2.0-era) catalog entry carries. The intermediate v1.3.0 release declared it optional (#4935); v1.4.0 corrects that as a design decision: AEE is one evaluator among many, and its results are composed through the common Evaluator extension so every evaluator's output is handled consistently — consistency by construction, not by each project's choice. The runner now enforces the pairing:assessrefuses (exit 2) when the Evaluator extension is not installed.- No
sha256is submitted, as with #4890; the catalog may record the digest validation computes for the v1.4.0 archive. Thev1.4.0tag will not be moved or recreated.
Links:
- Extension release: https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/releases/tag/v1.4.0
- Engine release (the floor): https://github.com/electrohire/applied-epistemic-engineering/releases/tag/v1.5.0 — also on PyPI as
applied-epistemic-engineering==1.5.0 - Evaluator release (the required companion): https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-evaluator/releases/tag/v1.1.0
- The v1.4.0 archive at the download URL above returns HTTP 200, and its
extension.ymlparses to idaee, version1.4.0,spec-kit-evaluatorrequired: true, 10 command files, 5 hooks.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 140k
- Forks
- 12.6k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 11 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 184
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de github/spec-kit
-
feature-assess feature-go triage-can-wait
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
github/spec-kit#4804 · 6 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Bug]: specify init writes speckit.manifest.json without the speckit-converge skill it just installedQuizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. Abiertobug-assess severity-medium
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
github/spec-kit#4273 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Bug]: /speckit-implement counts checkbox markers inside fenced code blocks — example checkboxes can falsely block implementationPosiblemente ocupada @ntdatt812 la tomó hace 32 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Extension]: Jira Integration (Sync Engine) v0.5.0 (version update of jira-sync)Posiblemente ocupada @github-actions la tomó hace 57 días. Abiertoextension-submission validation-passed
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
github/spec-kit#4099 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Extension]: Add spec-kit-switchQuizá libre de nuevo @wagner-sousa la tomó hace 73 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abiertoextension-submission validation-passed
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
github/spec-kit#3932 · 6 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de github/spec-kit
Issues similares
-
effort: low prio: low ready
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
digitalfabrik/integreat-cms#4616 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 5 días
-
bug difficulty:2 good first issue help wanted
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
MakazhanAlpamys/Soup#1865 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
FinanceFlash/unvibecode#233 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area: agents area: docs good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
openapi/gknowledge#23 ·
-
useless-suppression reported for deprecated-* messages that should be exemptPosiblemente ocupada @adityasinha-ghub la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
pylint-dev/pylint#11656 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día