[Feature]: Deprecate the core taskstoissues command
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 55/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- github, python
- Área
- cli, documentation
Línea de trabajo
Después de que se publique #4421, empieza en el punto de entrada central de CLI /speckit.taskstoissues e inspecciona los inventarios de comandos y la documentación orientada al usuario. Verifica el comportamiento existente, las comprobaciones de seguridad, la deduplicación y los hooks before_taskstoissues/after_taskstoissues antes de añadir la advertencia. La tarea estará terminada cuando el comando siga funcionando, los comandos de migración y el estado de deprecación estén documentados, y el trabajo dependiente pueda dirigirse a la extensión.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Problem Statement
/speckit.taskstoissues is currently presented as a core Spec Kit command even though it performs GitHub-specific issue-tracker integration. Once the bundled GitHub Issues extension from #4421 is available, users should be guided toward the extension before the core command is removed.
Removing the command without a deprecation period would provide no transition window for existing projects, automation, presets, or dependent extensions.
Proposed Solution
After #4421 has shipped, mark the core /speckit.taskstoissues command as deprecated while preserving its behavior for this stage.
When invoked, the command should display a concise warning that:
- The core command is deprecated and will be removed in a future minor release.
- Its replacement is the bundled
github-issuesextension. - Users can migrate with:
specify extension add github-issues
/speckit.github-issues.taskstoissues
The deprecation must not automatically install or enable the extension. Existing command behavior, safety checks, deduplication, and lifecycle hooks should remain unchanged until the removal stage.
Update user-facing command inventories and documentation to distinguish the deprecated core command from the recommended extension command.
Alternatives Considered
- Deprecate before adding the extension: Rejected because the warning would point users toward a replacement that is not yet available.
- Silently document the migration without an invocation warning: Easy to miss for users who do not regularly read release notes.
- Remove the command in the same release: Provides no practical migration window for existing users or dependent extensions.
Component
Specify CLI (initialization, commands)
AI Agent (if applicable)
All agents
Use Cases
- Existing users learn how to migrate while their current command still works.
- Preset and extension authors have time to update dependencies and hook references.
- Teams can schedule the extension installation before a later upgrade removes the core command.
Acceptance Criteria
- This issue is implemented only after #4421 has shipped.
- Invoking the core
speckit.taskstoissuescommand displays an actionable deprecation warning. - The warning identifies
speckit.github-issues.taskstoissuesas the replacement and includes the installation command. - The deprecated core command retains its existing behavior.
-
before_taskstoissuesandafter_taskstoissueshooks continue to work. - Core command documentation and inventories clearly mark the command as deprecated.
- Migration documentation covers existing projects, integrations, presets, and extensions.
- #4370 and other dependent work can update their dependency target to the extension command.
- The change is included in a minor release after the extension release.
Additional Context
This is stage 2 of the three-stage migration:
- #4421 adds the bundled extension while retaining core behavior.
- This issue deprecates the core command.
- A follow-up issue will remove it from core after the deprecation window.
Related discussion: #4370, especially https://github.com/github/spec-kit/issues/4370#issuecomment-5525946904.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 138k
- Forks
- 12.4k
- Merge medio
- 3 d 4 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 154
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de github/spec-kit
-
enhancement needs-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
enhancement needs-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
-
enhancement needs-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
-
enhancement needs-triage triage-can-wait
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
Todos los issues de github/spec-kit
Issues similares
-
essnmx good first issue
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 95/100
-
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · 1 comentario ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Abiertoarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·