Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Unhandled "provider is closed" inside the runtime's own error handler terminates the host process

Abierto
#2,517 2 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
48/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
csharp, node.js
Área
api, backend

Línea de trabajo

Comienza con la ruta de error de napi-oop-runtime mostrada en dist/index.js y los frames filterSecrets, writeLog y handleError de app.js; reproduce un dispatch de herramienta en curso seguido de la eliminación de la sesión. Se considera terminado cuando un fallo posterior al cierre se informa sin usar recursivamente el provider cerrado, y el host sigue ejecutándose con un fallo de operación que se pueda capturar.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

Environment: @github/copilot 1.0.71 (win32-x64), Node v24.16.0, .NET 8 host embedding the SDK in-process (napi-oop-runtime).

Summary

When a tool-call result is written to a session after its provider has been closed, the runtime raises Error: provider is closed. Its error handler then logs that failure through the same closed provider, which throws a second time inside the handler. That second throw is unhandled and terminates the host process with 0xC0000005 (access violation) rather than failing the operation.

Error: provider is closed
    at Object.call (napi-oop-runtime/dist/index.js:68:2208)
    at Proxy.S (napi-oop-runtime/dist/index.js:68:3671)
    at t.filterSecrets (app.js:114:26376)
    at wR.filterSecrets (app.js:143:52707)
    at wR.error (app.js:651:10732)
    at wR.writeLog (app.js:652:163)
    at Hle.logToLevel (app.js:61:1536)
    at Hle.error (app.js:61:1719)
    at t.handleError (app.js:5076:625)
    at process.<anonymous> (app.js:5076:360)

The final two frames are the process-level handler, so there is nothing left to catch it.

Reproduction shape

  1. Create a session and subscribe to ExternalToolRequestedEvent.
  2. Dispatch the tool asynchronously — the event handler cannot await it, so the dispatch is fire-and-forget.
  3. Dispose the session while a dispatch is still in flight, for example because the turn was cancelled by a deadline.
  4. The dispatch completes and calls session.Rpc.Tools.HandlePendingToolCallAsync(...) on the now-closed session.

Observed reliably on a long-running host that creates one session per turn against a process-wide client.

Impact

The whole host process dies, not just the affected session. For a service embedding the SDK, every concurrent operation in that process is lost, and the failure surfaces as a process exit rather than an exception the caller can handle. A caller cannot defend against this in managed code either, since an access violation is not catchable.

Suggested fix

Make the error-handling path resilient to a closed provider. filterSecrets / writeLog reach back into the provider while handling an error that the provider itself raised; falling back to a local sink when the provider is unavailable would keep the secondary failure inside handleError instead of letting it escape.

More generally, an error raised because a resource is closed should not be reported through that same resource.

Workaround

On the caller side: gate any post-dispatch write on session liveness, and drain in-flight dispatches before disposing the session. That removes the trigger but not the underlying fragility — any other error raised after provider close will still terminate the process.

Lenguaje dominante
Java
Estrellas
10.5k
Forks
1.5k
Merge medio
1 d 9 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
130

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de github/copilot-sdk

Todos los issues de github/copilot-sdk

Issues similares

Más issues de Java

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.