Python extractor reports parse errors for files no longer in the scanned commit
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 48/100
Línea de trabajo
Comienza reproduciendo los diagnósticos del extractor de Python contra el commit 996e624, en el que se eliminaron los archivos reportados, y compara el conjunto de archivos escaneados por el extractor con el commit comprobado. Usa python -m py_compile como línea base de sintaxis. Se considera terminado cuando los archivos aceptados no producen errores de análisis falsos y los archivos eliminados no se reportan.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Setup
- CodeQL version: 2.27.0
- Language: Python 3.13
- GitHub default CodeQL analysis (Advanced Security > Code scanning > Default setup)
- Repo (private): https://github.com/lumin-ai/lumin-bot
Observed behavior
CodeQL reports parse errors about two Python files. Here's a log sample (I've replaced my actual filenames with foo.py and bar.py):
Analysis produced the following diagnostic information:
##[group]Could not process some files due to syntax errors (2 results)
* foo.py#L0C0:0: A parse error occurred while processing `foo.py`, and as a result this file could not be analyzed. Check the syntax of the file using the `python -m py_compile` command and correct any invalid syntax.
* bar.py#L0C0:0: A parse error occurred while processing `bar.py`, and as a result this file could not be analyzed. Check the syntax of the file using the `python -m py_compile` command and correct any invalid syntax.
##[endgroup]
What I tried
-
I ran
python -m py_compileon both files. This check completed without errors on Python 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, and 3.12. -
I removed an old header from the files:
# -*- coding: future_fstrings -*-. This header was a leftover from a Python 2 to Python 3 migration involving https://github.com/asottile-archive/future-fstrings. The warnings stayed. (I imagine, but am not sure, that this header caused the original parsing problem. These two files were the only ones in the repo that still had it.) -
I checked the files for invisible characters and for a byte order mark. The only non-ASCII characters were some bullet characters inside one docstring. I replaced them with ASCII hyphens. The warnings stayed.
-
I replaced the full contents of both files with a single
passstatement. The warnings stayed. -
I deleted both files. The warnings stayed. I believe these logs confirm that CodeQL scanned the commit where I deleted the files (commit 996e624 in pull request 3584):
##[group]Checking out the ref [command]/usr/bin/git checkout --progress --force refs/remotes/pull/3584/head Note: switching to 'refs/remotes/pull/3584/head'. You are in 'detached HEAD' state. You can look around, make experimental changes and commit them, and you can discard any commits you make in this state without impacting any branches by switching back to a branch. If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create, you may do so (now or later) by using -c with the switch command. Example: git switch -c <new-branch-name> Or undo this operation with: git switch - Turn off this advice by setting config variable advice.detachedHead to false HEAD is now at 996e624 bisect: blow away the whole python modules to see if codeql still complains [skip tests] ##[endgroup]
Expected behavior
- CodeQL must not report parse errors for Python files that
python -m py_compileaccepts. - CodeQL must not report parse errors for files that do not exist in the scanned commit.
- Lenguaje dominante
- CodeQL
- Estrellas
- 10.1k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Merge medio
- 2 d 10 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 134
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de github/codeql
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
-
C#: cs/simplifiable-boolean-expression false positive on Nullable<bool> compared with a literal Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
false-positive
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
-
false-positive
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Todos los issues de github/codeql
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
use-agent-os/agent-os#3314 ·
-
[aw] Upgrade available Abiertoagentic-workflows
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
githubnext/rig#534 ·
-
Implement GitHub Issue templates Abiertodocumentation low-priority templates
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
jesseray718/openroot#87 ·
-
factory-active factory-automatic task-bug-reproduction-cannot-reproduce task-identify-harness-labels-done task-identify-issue-type-done
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
-
Add PR Default Description(s) Abiertoenhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
ReedClanton/NixOS#41 ·