False Negative: ImplicitPendingIntents.ql misses mutable implicit PendingIntents once they are stored, enriched, or sent through slightly noisier code paths.
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 48/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Stack tecnológico
- java
- Área
- mobile-dev, security
Línea de trabajo
Empieza por Security/CWE/CWE-927/ImplicitPendingIntents.ql y por los ejemplos afectados PosCase1.java, PosCase2.java y PosCase3.java. Reproduce los falsos negativos y rastrea cómo las escrituras de parcelable, el almacenamiento de campos y las lecturas de arrays afectan al flujo de construcción a envío; se considera terminado cuando estos PendingIntents implícitos mutables enviados a destinatarios no especificados se marcan.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
False Negative: ImplicitPendingIntents.ql misses mutable implicit PendingIntents once they are stored, enriched, or sent through slightly noisier code paths.
Version
codeql 2.24.3
Checker
- Checker id:
Security/CWE/CWE-927/ImplicitPendingIntents.ql - Checker description: This checker detects when an implicit Intent is created and then flows into a PendingIntent that is sent to an unspecified third party.
Description of the false negative
These cases still create an implicit Intent, wrap it in a mutable PendingIntent, and then send that PendingIntent to an unspecified recipient. The extra parcelable write, field store, or unrelated array read does not change the security outcome.
Affected test cases
PosCase1.java
The intent remains implicit when it is wrapped in the PendingIntent and sent onward. The extra statements do not make it safe.
// Implicit Intent with mutable PendingIntent sent to third party, including allowed implicit read of parcelable extra, should be flagged as unsafe.
package scensct.core.pos;
import android.app.PendingIntent;
import android.content.Context;
import android.content.Intent;
import android.os.Parcelable;
public class PosCase1 {
public void sendPendingIntentToThirdParty(Context context, Parcelable extraData) {
// Implicit Intent creation
Intent implicitIntent = new Intent("com.example.ACTION_TRIGGER");
// Allowed implicit read of parcelable extra (policy allows reading parcelable extras)
implicitIntent.putExtra("key", extraData);
// Create mutable PendingIntent from implicit Intent
PendingIntent pending = PendingIntent.getActivity(
context,
0,
implicitIntent,
PendingIntent.FLAG_MUTABLE
);
// Send to unspecified third party via PendingIntent.send()
try {
pending.send();
} catch (PendingIntent.CanceledException e) {
// Handle exception
}
}
}
PosCase2.java
This still creates a mutable implicit PendingIntent for an unspecified recipient. The issue is unchanged.
// Implicit Intent with mutable PendingIntent sent to third party, including implicit read of PendingIntent field, should be flagged as unsafe.
package scensct.core.pos;
import android.app.PendingIntent;
import android.content.Context;
import android.content.Intent;
public class PosCase2 {
static class Container {
PendingIntent pendingIntentField;
}
public void sendPendingIntentToThirdParty(Context context, Container container) {
// Implicit Intent creation
Intent implicitIntent = new Intent("com.example.ACTION_TRIGGER");
// Create mutable PendingIntent from implicit Intent
PendingIntent pending = PendingIntent.getActivity(
context,
0,
implicitIntent,
PendingIntent.FLAG_MUTABLE
);
// Implicit read of PendingIntent field (reading container.pendingIntentField)
container.pendingIntentField = pending;
// Send to unspecified third party via PendingIntent.send()
try {
container.pendingIntentField.send();
} catch (PendingIntent.CanceledException e) {
// Handle exception
}
}
}
PosCase3.java
The added statements are incidental. The important part is that the implicit intent still flows into a third-party PendingIntent.
// Implicit Intent with mutable PendingIntent sent to third party, including implicit read of Intent array, should be flagged as unsafe.
package scensct.core.pos;
import android.app.PendingIntent;
import android.content.Context;
import android.content.Intent;
public class PosCase3 {
public void sendPendingIntentToThirdParty(Context context, Intent[] intentArray, int index) {
// Implicit Intent creation
Intent implicitIntent = new Intent("com.example.ACTION_TRIGGER");
// Create mutable PendingIntent from implicit Intent
PendingIntent pending = PendingIntent.getActivity(
context,
0,
implicitIntent,
PendingIntent.FLAG_MUTABLE
);
// Implicit read of Intent array (accessing intentArray[index])
Intent retrievedIntent = intentArray[index];
// Send to unspecified third party via PendingIntent.send()
try {
pending.send();
} catch (PendingIntent.CanceledException e) {
// Handle exception
}
}
}
Cause analysis
The query appears too dependent on a direct, linear construction-to-send pattern. Once the PendingIntent is written to a field, accompanied by another benign read, or the Intent is slightly enriched before wrapping, the result disappears.
That is too brittle for Security/CWE/CWE-927/ImplicitPendingIntents.ql. Real Android code rarely keeps these flows in a single minimal statement sequence.
References
None known.
- Lenguaje dominante
- CodeQL
- Estrellas
- 10.1k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Merge medio
- 2 d 16 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 143
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de github/codeql
-
agentic-workflows
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
-
false-positive javascript
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
-
C#: cs/simplifiable-boolean-expression false positive on Nullable<bool> compared with a literal Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
false-positive
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Todos los issues de github/codeql
Issues similares
-
[New Rule] (Cash Raven) Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
LibChecker/LibChecker-Rules#1391 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
ankidroid/Anki-Android#21999 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
wultra/mtoken-sdk-ios#253 ·