Missing advisory for CVE-2023-52251 (provectus/kafka-ui) — 447M-pull image with an unpatched RCE and no matchable entry anywhere
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 38/100
Línea de trabajo
Comienza revisando las entradas de advisories existentes, tanto revisadas como no revisadas, y la API de GitHub Advisory Database. Después, compara sus campos de ecosistema compatible y paquete afectado con los detalles de la imagen de Docker de este issue. Comprueba SECURITY.md y las evidencias referenciadas de MessageFilters.java, incluido el rango >= 0.4.0 y <= 0.7.2. Se considera completado cuando el repositorio haya decidido si este artefacto no compatible puede representarse y, de ser así, haya aceptado datos de advisory en el esquema esperado.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
CVE-2023-52251 (CVSS 3.1 8.8 HIGH, published 2024-01-25) has no entry in the GitHub
Advisory Database. I checked all three types via the API — reviewed, unreviewed and
malware all return zero hits for this CVE ID.
It is a remote code execution issue in provectus/kafka-ui: the "smart filter" evaluates
attacker-supplied Groovy via the q parameter of
/api/clusters/local/topics/{topic}/messages. A public exploit exists.
Why I think this one is worth carrying even though it is not a package:
- The affected artifact is the Docker image
provectuslabs/kafka-ui, with
447,220,745 pulls and Docker Hub statusactive. - The repository has 12,278 stars and 1,411 forks and is not archived, with no commit
since 2024-04-08. - Its own SECURITY.md still claims 0.7.x is "currently being supported with security
updates". - No other database produces a matchable entry either: the MITRE record has
vendor/product/version = n/a, NVD derives only
cpe:2.3:a:provectus:ui:*:*:*:*:*:kafka:*:*with no version boundaries, and the OSV
entry has an empty package field. So Dependabot, Docker Scout, Trivy and Grype are all
silent on it. - It is exploited in the wild. An operator running
provectuslabs/kafka-ui:latestexposed
without authentication had the container used to mine cryptocurrency for about 1.5 days,
resulting in a hosting-provider abuse report.
Correct affected data (measured 2026-09-08): >= 0.4.0, <= 0.7.2, no patched version.
Note this differs from NVD, which stops at 0.7.1 — v0.7.2 ships the identical vulnerable
MessageFilters.java (98 lines, GroovyScriptEngineImpl, case GROOVY_SCRIPT) and was
released 2024-04-10, after the CVE. :latest and :v0.7.2 share the digest
sha256:8f2ff02d64b0a7a2b71b6b3b3148b85f66d00ec20ad40c30bdcd415d46d31818.
The fix exists only in the fork kafbat/kafka-ui (commit 11a57d14, 2024-02-10, released
in v1.0.0), which renamed the package namespace from com.provectus.kafka.ui to
io.kafbat.ui — a migration to a different artifact, not an upgrade path.
Two asks:
- Carry the CVE as an unreviewed advisory so it is at least visible and searchable in the
database. - Consider this a data point for container-image coverage. I understand OCI images are
outside the 12 supported ecosystems today. This case shows the gap has a concrete
consequence: an image with 447M pulls, a known 8.8 RCE, an unmaintained upstream, and
no tooling anywhere that flags it.
I have reported the empty OSV entry separately (google/osv.dev#5988), and a CVE update
request to MITRE to populate the structured affected fields is being submitted in
parallel — that record is the upstream cause, since it was published with
vendor/product/version all set to n/a.
Happy to open a PR here with advisory data in whichever schema you prefer, if that is
useful.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Sin datos de lenguaje
- Estrellas
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 772
- Merge medio
- 3 d 15 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 46
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de github/advisory-database
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
github/advisory-database#9255 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
github/advisory-database#9164 · 1 reacción ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
github/advisory-database#8994 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
github/advisory-database#8898 · 4 comentarios · 1 reacción ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
github/advisory-database#8841 ·
Todos los issues de github/advisory-database
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
-
Business User Story
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
-
[Documentation Request] vLLM kv_load_failure_policy doesn't apply to load failures in L2 adapters Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
-
Cannot reset column width Abierto0. Needs triage bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100