Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Wrapping combinators (TaskSeq.map, taskSeq { for .. }) yield the final item twice over an external IAsyncEnumerable on a non-default TaskScheduler (Orleans grain)

Abierto
#452 11 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
45/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
fsharp
Área
backend

Línea de trabajo

Comienza con tests/Orleans.FSharp.Integration/FunctionalPhaseFIntegrationTests.fs alrededor de las líneas 598-627 y FunctionalPhaseFFixture.fs alrededor de las líneas 305-324; después, ejecuta el comando dotnet test filtrado proporcionado. Compara la enumeración directa con las rutas del wrapper TaskSeq.map y taskSeq bajo el scheduler de Orleans. Se considera terminado cuando las rutas envueltas ya no producen el elemento final dos veces y la enumeración directa sigue siendo correcta.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

bug needs investigation

Summary

TaskSeq.map and taskSeq { for item in upstream do yield ... } over an externally produced IAsyncEnumerable<T> each yield the final item twice when the consumption runs on a non-default TaskScheduler — observed deterministically inside a Microsoft Orleans grain activation (Orleans' per-activation scheduler). Enumerating the same IAsyncEnumerable<T> directly (the exact await foreach desugaring: GetAsyncEnumerator / MoveNextAsync / Current / DisposeAsync) yields the correct count.

Environment

  • FSharp.Control.TaskSeq 0.6.0
  • .NET 10 (net10.0), F#
  • Reproduces identically on Microsoft Orleans 10.1.0 and 10.2.2 (the enumerable being wrapped is produced by Orleans' IAsyncEnumerableGrainExtension machinery — batched MoveNext pulls over grain calls)

The discriminator (what isolates it to the wrapping construct)

One grain method consumes the same 3-item upstream stream three ways and returns the three counts as an ordinary unary reply, so nothing about our own streaming-reply transport participates in the measurement:

let! direct = TaskSeq.toListAsync (upstream.watch (label, 3))          // plain enumeration of the source

let! viaMap =
    upstream.watch (label2, 3)
    |> TaskSeq.map (fun tick -> tick.note)                             // wrapped
    |> TaskSeq.toListAsync

let! viaFor =
    TaskSeq.toListAsync (taskSeq {                                     // wrapped
        for tick in upstream.watch (label3, 3) do yield tick.note
    })

Result, measured 2026-08-18, stable across runs and across both Orleans versions:

(List.length direct, List.length viaMap, List.length viaFor) = (3, 4, 4)

direct = 3 is correct; both wrapping forms report 4 items for a 3-item stream, the last item duplicated.

What tracing showed

Instrumenting all enumerator layers on the failing path localized it precisely: the taskSeq wrapper yielded one extra MoveNextAsync = true with a stale Current immediately after the inner enumerator had already answered false.

What we ruled out

  • Our own enumerable implementation: direct enumeration is correct everywhere, including batched sources, empty sources, and a throwing producer.
  • The obvious structural suspects: four progressively more faithful offline models on the ordinary thread pool — an all-synchronous enumerator, a batched one, one whose terminating MoveNextAsync completes asynchronously, and a full in-process re-implementation of the Orleans pull loop driving two stacked legs — none reproduced it. The trigger appears to require the custom TaskScheduler an Orleans activation runs on.

Repro status (honest)

We could not reduce it to a standalone console repro — that is the main obstacle to a better report, and why this issue points at a live test instead. In our repository it reproduces deterministically:

To observe the raw counts: clone the branch, change the discriminator's assertion to print the tuple, and run dotnet test tests/Orleans.FSharp.Integration --filter "FullyQualifiedName~consuming an upstream stream inside a grain".

Happy to run any diagnostic build or instrumented package against this environment if that helps narrow it down.

Lenguaje dominante
F#
Estrellas
111
Forks
13
Merge medio
7 h 59 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
3

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de fsprojects/FSharp.Control.TaskSeq

Todos los issues de fsprojects/FSharp.Control.TaskSeq

Issues similares

Más issues de Backend & API Design

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.