String concat contains dummy comparision.

Busca en el repositorio el benchmark de String concatenation descrito en el issue y lee su configuración actual y los casos reportados. Actualiza el benchmark para cubrir longitudes de strings aleatorizadas y la concatenación de múltiples strings, y luego compara los resultados con los ejemplos del issue para confirmar que se ha corregido la comparación engañosa con una entrada fija.

You are doing your test without any randomization and length variety, so results are incorrect completely.

You simply just testing how fast are 'foo' and 'bar' concatenation, and only

Live case scenario looks more like this:

# strings length is a ( 100 + rand( 100 ) ), i.e. short strings max difference around double 

 String#append:   439150.7 i/s
            String#+:   419672.1 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error
  "#{'foo'}#{'bar'}":   365799.6 i/s - 1.20x  slower
       String#concat:   353912.5 i/s - 1.24x  slower

 # strings length is a  (1000 + rand( 1000) ) , i.e. longer strings max difference around double

            String#+:   298633.5 i/s
   String#append:   284566.8 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error
  "#{'foo'}#{'bar'}":   267548.4 i/s - 1.12x  slower
    String#concat:   215419.4 i/s - 1.39x  slower

# string length is a ( 100 + rand(1000) ), i.e. highly variable length
             String#+:   388205.2 i/s
   String#append:   357669.3 i/s - 1.09x  slower
  "#{'foo'}#{'bar'}":   331617.7 i/s - 1.17x  slower
    String#concat:   286717.8 i/s - 1.35x  slower

# string length is a 1 + rand 1000, i.e. random string
             String#+:   385180.8 i/s
   String#append:   373926.8 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error
  "#{'foo'}#{'bar'}":   341496.6 i/s - 1.13x  slower
   String#concat:   297988.1 i/s - 1.29x  slower

OK

# This is completely oposite to
         "foo" "bar":  5369594.5 i/s
 "#{'foo'}#{'bar'}":  5181745.7 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error
   String#append:  3075719.2 i/s - 1.75x slower
    String#concat:  3016703.5 i/s - 1.78x slower
            String#+:  2977282.7 i/s - 1.80x slower

Also you didn't test on multiple string concat, where actually "#{'foo'} #{'bar'} #{'shines'}".