LEAmDNS: _parseResponse keeps every answer record of a packet on the heap, so one large answer can abort with out of memory
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 52/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- arduino, cpp
- Área
- embedded-iot
Línea de trabajo
Start in libraries/ESP8266mDNS/src/LEAmDNS_Control.cpp: trace _parseResponse through _readRRAnswer and _processAnswers, then compare with _parseQuery's record handling. The report proposes processing and freeing each response record before reading the next; done means response handling no longer retains all packet records at once while preserving probe and service query behavior. The reporter says they have a patched copy, but provides no test or captured packet.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
What happens
An ESP8266 (core 3.1.2, a GeekMagic SmallTV-Ultra with about 6 KB of free heap while running) restarted after
11.4 hours with an out-of-memory abort inside LEAmDNS. Our crash record, decoded with addr2line:
operator new (288 bytes) failed
<- MDNSResponder::_readRRAnswer
<- MDNSResponder::_parseResponse
<- MDNSResponder::_parseMessage
<- MDNSResponder::_process
free heap 952 bytes, largest free block 248 bytes
The lowest values recorded before, during those hours, were about 4.4 KB free and a 1.5 KB largest block. So
about 3.5 KB went within a moment. The sketch only advertises (MDNS.begin, addService, addServiceTxt, and
MDNS.update() in loop()); it sends no queries.
Why, from reading the code (master, libraries/ESP8266mDNS/src/LEAmDNS_Control.cpp)
_parseResponsereads answers only while a service query waits or a probe runs (line 742-743). Probing runs
afterMDNS.beginand again after every interface status change (LEAmDNS.cpp, thestatusChangeCBthat
calls_restart()), for example a Wi-Fi reconnect.- In that state, every record of the incoming packet (
ANCount + NSCount + ARCount, taken from the packet
header) is read with_readRRAnswerinto its own heap object and kept in a list (lines 764-775). - The list goes to
_processAnswersas a whole (line 794) and is freed only after that (lines 804-810).
So the heap needed grows with the number of records in someone else's answer. A phone, TV or speaker that
answers with many records during the probe window can take several KB at once. new aborts on failure in this
core, so the library's own checks for a failed allocation never run, and the result is a restart.
What we did not measure: we have not captured the packet, and we don't know for sure that a reconnect came just
before. That part is our reading of the code.
_parseQuery handles known answers differently: it frees each record right after reading it (so one record at a
time), which is why we think the same can work for responses.
Possible fix
Handle each answer record in _parseResponse as soon as it is read, and free it before reading the next, so the
peak is one record instead of the whole packet. That means splitting _processAnswers so it can take one record
at a time. A simpler, partial alternative: skip (read past without allocating) records whose names cannot
concern this responder.
We are trying the first approach in a patched copy for our own firmware and can open a PR if this direction is
welcome.
- Lenguaje dominante
- C++
- Estrellas
- 16.7k
- Forks
- 13k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 2 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 7
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de esp8266/Arduino
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
esp8266/Arduino#9342 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Typo in Scan Class DocumentationPosiblemente ocupada @MukundaKatta la tomó hace 207 días. Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
esp8266/Arduino#9203 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
esp8266/Arduino#9324 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 42/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de esp8266/Arduino
Issues similares
-
status:needs-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
PX4/PX4-Autopilot#29698 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
go perft exits when EvalFile is unavailablePosiblemente ocupada @Muawiya-contact la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
official-stockfish/Stockfish#7292 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 77/100
arvidn/libtorrent#9149 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Upstream report: MSVC rejects a designated initializer in a dependent template argument (C2131)Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
rhalbersma/tabula#72 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día