Proposal for handling additional file inclusions/exclusions
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading the existing model discovery and related-file expansion code, plus the configuration and tests for the exclusion options discussed in PRs #267 and #300. The issue proposes two alternative designs but does not choose one or identify files to change. Done means a chosen design is implemented and tested for model filtering and related-file exclusions.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
I have been thinking through this and the other issues. In the end, it would be great to move away from option flags towards an explicit structure for controlling what does and does not get annotated. Do let me know what you think. Note: I used AI to create the proposals. (Moved this from #300)
How I think the ideal pipeline could be:
The Pipeline
1. Model discovery → scan model_dir globs, find candidate .rb files
2. Model filter → whitelist OR exclusion (mutually exclusive) — PRs #267 and #300
↓ surviving models
3. Related file → per model, expand to related files via patterns
expansion (additional_file_patterns, test/fixture/factory patterns, etc.)
↓ combined set: models + related files
4. Related file → additional exclusions for step 3, for example if you want to exclude annotating tests for a specific model
filtering
↓ final set to annotate
These are two options for handling exclusion
Option A — Unified Exclusion
A single exclude_patterns option operates on the combined set (models + related files) after expansion. (This would happen at step 4)
# .annotaterb.yml
exclude_patterns:
- "**/*.spec.rb" # prevents spec files from being treated as models
- "spec/billing/**/*" # prevents billing-related specs from being annotated
How it works:
- Model discovery finds all candidate files
- Model-level whitelist or exclusion is applied (PRs #267/#300)
- Related files are expanded per model
exclude_patternsis applied to the combined set — any file matching a pattern is dropped
Pros:
- Single concept and single config key — easy to explain and document
- Consistent: the same mechanism handles both model-level and related-file-level exclusion
- Familiar — similar to
.gitignoresemantics
Cons:
- Loses the distinction between "don't treat this as a model" and "don't annotate this related file" — both collapse into "don't touch this file"
- A pattern intended to exclude related files could unintentionally also exclude model files if written broadly
- Less explicit about which layer is being targeted
Option B — Separate Exclusion Options
Two distinct options target different layers of the pipeline explicitly.
# .annotaterb.yml
# Affects model discovery only — prevents files from being loaded as models
exclude_model_patterns:
- "**/*.spec.rb"
# Affects related file annotation only — models are still processed, but
# matching related files are skipped
exclude_related_file_patterns:
- "spec/billing/**/*"
How it works:
- Model discovery finds all candidate files
exclude_model_patternsis applied — matching files are dropped before any model loading- Related files are expanded per surviving model
exclude_related_file_patternsis applied to the related file set only
Pros:
- Explicit — the user knows exactly which layer they are targeting
exclude_model_patternscleanly handles PR #267 (.spec.rbfiles in model directories)exclude_related_file_patternscleanly complements the existingexclude_*boolean flags with pattern-based control- No risk of a related-file pattern accidentally excluding a model file
Cons:
- Two options to learn and document instead of one
- User must understand the distinction between model discovery and related file annotation to use correctly
- Slightly more config verbosity
- Lenguaje dominante
- Ruby
- Estrellas
- 624
- Forks
- 95
- Merge medio
- 1 d 21 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 10
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de drwl/annotaterb
-
additional_file_patterns no longer matches files outside empty root_dirPosiblemente ocupada @Shaisolaris la tomó hace 2 días. Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
drwl/annotaterb#406 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
`v4.25.0`: enum columns declared with a Rails-side `default:` still annotate the raw value instead of the labelPosiblemente ocupada @xanagi la tomó hace 1 día. Abierto
Dificultad 3/5 Medio día Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
drwl/annotaterb#408 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
`annotaterb models --delete` doesn't remove annotations from files excluded via `exclude_*`Posiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
drwl/annotaterb#340 · 2 comentarios · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
drwl/annotaterb#323 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Improve Documentation for YAML and CLI OptionsQuizá libre de nuevo @OdenTakashi la tomó hace 193 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abierto
drwl/annotaterb#312 · 8 comentarios · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
Todos los issues de drwl/annotaterb
Issues similares
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:bundler priority:p1
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1573 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Generated server webpack config keeps Rspack's manifest and CSS extraction pluginsPosiblemente ocupada @justin808 la tomó hoy. Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
shakacode/react_on_rails#5184 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug chat verified
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 6 días
-
🐞 bug pending triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
CircuitVerse/CircuitVerse#8031 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Empty members in the Accept header cause a 500Posiblemente ocupada @koic la tomó hoy. Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
modelcontextprotocol/ruby-sdk#609 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día