.dockerignore reinclusion retains unrelated files in a glob-excluded directory
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 74/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- docker, python
- Área
- build-system
Línea de trabajo
Start from docker.utils.tar and the exclude/reinclusion pattern matching behind it (docker/utils/build.py) to see how **/cache combined with !cache/keep.txt is evaluated. Run the reproducer script from the issue (reproduce-ancestor.py) to confirm the current output keeps cache/drop.txt, then compare with the stated BuildKit expectation: only cache/keep.txt survives while src/cache/drop.txt is dropped. Done means the reproducer prints ['cache/keep.txt'] for the fixture files and the existing unit tests for build-context tar creation still pass.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
🤖 this issue description was generated by an LLM. i reviewed it before submitting. 🤖
I used Codex for the investigation, reproduction scripts, and this draft.
When I generate a build context with docker.utils.tar, the rules **/cache and !cache/keep.txt retain both cache/keep.txt and cache/drop.txt. Docker's BuildKit keeps only cache/keep.txt with the same input. The SDK therefore includes an unrelated file that the ignore rule excludes.
Reproduction
Save this script as reproduce-ancestor.py:
import tarfile
from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory
import docker
from docker.utils import tar
patterns = ['**/cache', '!cache/keep.txt']
files = ['cache/drop.txt', 'cache/keep.txt', 'src/cache/drop.txt']
with TemporaryDirectory() as directory:
root = Path(directory)
(root / 'Dockerfile').write_text('FROM scratch\nCOPY . /\n')
(root / '.dockerignore').write_text('\n'.join(patterns) + '\n')
for relative in files:
path = root / relative
path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
path.write_text(relative)
with tar(str(root), exclude=patterns.copy()) as context:
with tarfile.open(fileobj=context) as archive:
actual = sorted(name for name in archive.getnames() if name in files)
print('docker:', docker.__version__)
print('patterns:', patterns)
print('SDK context files:', actual)
I ran it in an isolated uv environment, using commit 56343ddf8f0c44281e151c2dad016c16cdb8393d:
uv run --isolated --no-project --no-config --no-cache \
--python /home/jyn/.local/share/mise/installs/python/3.14.7/bin/python3 \
--with 'docker @ git+https://github.com/docker/docker-py@56343ddf8f0c44281e151c2dad016c16cdb8393d' \
python reproduce-ancestor.py
The --python path selects my tested Python installation; use the path to your Python executable on another machine. The pinned requirement selects the upstream SDK rather than an installed copy. I did not modify the SDK or replace its modules with mocks. This reproducer creates disposable files and examines the SDK's context tar without contacting a Docker daemon.
Expected behavior
The SDK should retain only cache/keep.txt from the fixture payload files. It should exclude cache/drop.txt and src/cache/drop.txt. I built the same files with FROM scratch and COPY . / using BuildKit, and its local output retained only cache/keep.txt.
Actual output
docker: 7.2.1.dev26+g56343ddf8
patterns: ['**/cache', '!cache/keep.txt']
SDK context files: ['cache/drop.txt', 'cache/keep.txt']
BuildKit control
I ran the following standalone control with Docker's active lima context and lima builder. It creates the same input files, runs docker buildx build with a local filesystem export, and enumerates every exported regular file before removing the temporary directories. The command uses the active Docker context and builder; another machine can use its own working configuration.
Buildx command and exported-file inspection
Save this script as buildkit-control-ancestor.py:
import subprocess
from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory
patterns = ['**/cache', '!cache/keep.txt']
files = ['cache/drop.txt', 'cache/keep.txt', 'src/cache/drop.txt']
with TemporaryDirectory() as directory:
context = Path(directory) / 'input'
context.mkdir()
output = Path(directory) / 'output'
(context / 'Dockerfile').write_text('FROM scratch\nCOPY . /\n')
(context / '.dockerignore').write_text('\n'.join(patterns) + '\n')
for relative in files:
path = context / relative
path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
path.write_text(relative)
subprocess.run([
'docker', 'buildx', 'build',
'--progress=plain', '--provenance=false',
'--output', f'type=local,dest={output}', str(context),
], check=True)
print('BuildKit output files:', sorted(
path.relative_to(output).as_posix()
for path in output.rglob('*') if path.is_file()
))
Run it with:
python3 buildkit-control-ancestor.py
I got this stdout; Buildx wrote its progress log to stderr and exited successfully:
BuildKit output files: ['.dockerignore', 'Dockerfile', 'cache/keep.txt']
Environment
- Docker SDK for Python:
7.2.1.dev26+g56343ddf8, using upstream commit56343ddf8f0c44281e151c2dad016c16cdb8393d. - Python:
3.14.7 (main, Sep 29 2026, 15:01:40) [Clang 22.1.3 ]. - OS/distribution: CachyOS Linux, rolling release (
BUILD_ID=rolling;/etc/os-releasedoes not defineVERSION_ID). - Kernel/platform:
Linux-7.2.9-1-cachyos-x86_64-with-glibc2.44. - Docker CLI:
29.8.2; Docker Engine:29.8.0(linux/amd64). - Buildx:
github.com/docker/buildx 0.37.2 2d379c0c3f22da0d2759d132a0ec81ca949098f0. - The SDK tar reproducer requires no engine connection; the separate BuildKit comparison used the versions above.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 7.2k
- Forks
- 1.7k
- Merge medio
- 3 d 19 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 1
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de docker/docker-py
-
.dockerignore matching ignores filename case on LinuxPosiblemente ocupada @locker95 la tomó hace 1 día. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
-
Add `pull` to the list of kwargs to pass to create and runPosiblemente ocupada @zainnadeem786 la tomó hace 131 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
docker/docker-py#3369 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
docker/docker-py#2457 · 4 reacciones ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 80/100
docker/docker-py#3448 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
Todos los issues de docker/docker-py
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
MystenLabs/MemWal#1163 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
infertopics leaves new nodes without a topic when untopiced neighbours outnumber topiced onesPosiblemente ocupada @moneebullah25 la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
FinanceFlash/unvibecode#218 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
NVIDIA/earth2studio#1241 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días