chore: default to Rspamd from v17.0.0
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
@georglauterbach ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 13/8/2025.
Evaluación
Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.
Descripción
Description
I cite reasoning for preferring Rspamd as a maintainer here.
I am interested in feedback from anyone that prefers any of the existing suite of services that Rspamd replaces, which I'm now considering as legacy services in DMS (they are not pleasant to maintain/troubleshoot and have cost a fair amount of time over the years, unresolved issues aside):
Legacy services:
- Amavis - Frontend to SpamAssassin and ClamAV
- OpenDKIM (integrated via Postfix milter)
- OpenDMARC (integrated via Postfix milter)
- SpamAssassin (we do not use the
spamddaemon, our support relies upon Amavis to call SA via the SA Perl library AFAIK?) - policyd-spf (integrated via Postfix
check_policy_service) - PostGrey (integrated via Postfix
check_policy_service) - Greylisting support (Equivalent feature in Rspamd is likewise opt-in)
Links are to their associated setup script in DMS, but most have config/docs/tests elsewhere in the project and many associated past issues in the project.
An example of an issue I recently noticed was a difference in behaviour with SA scanning from DMS v14 (released in June 2024, upgraded to Debian 12 (June 2023) base image + SpamAssassin 4.0 (Dec 2022)), these sorts of issues require a fair amount of time to investigate and ideally resolve / document the cause when we lack maintenance expertise for these services.
The legacy set of services will remain for the time being as a fallback / alternative option. We've had Rspamd offered since DMS v12 (April 2023) and improved our support and docs a fair amount since then.
Eventually it would be preferrable to unload the burden of maintaining support for the legacy services. Thus if any users could share any concerns/experiences for why they might prefer any of the legacy services over Rspamd that'd be appreciated. Most alternatives to DMS already use Rspamd instead of our equivalent legacy set of services to my knowledge.
DMS v15 docs for Rspamd have had an initial revision with the intention of being easier to grok for users wanting to switch early. There will likely be some breaking changes for Rspamd in DMS v17, I may also try to push for upstream Rspamd to publish packages to their deb repo we use so that we can actually pin Rspamd releases for more deterministic image builds.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Shell
- Estrellas
- 19.7k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Merge medio
- 22 h 39 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 8
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Sin guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver
-
bug report: Messages deleted from Junk get learnt as hamPosiblemente ocupada @georglauterbach la tomó hoy. Abiertokind/bug/report meta/needs triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver#4831 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug report: headers within signed section get modified resulting in invalid signaturePosiblemente ocupada @Vosjedev la tomó hace 3 días. Abiertoarea/configuration (file) kind/bug/report meta/needs triage priority/high service/postfix
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 56/100
docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver#4830 · 1 comentario · 2 asignados ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
tracking: tackling the rising number of CVEsPosiblemente ocupada @casperklein la tomó hace 13 días. Abiertopriority/high
docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver#4822 · 10 comentarios · 3 reacciones · 2 asignados ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
feature request: sign with relaxed/relaxed body canonicalization by defaultQuizá libre de nuevo @casperklein la tomó hace 64 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abiertoarea/configuration (file) service/security/dkim-dmarc-spf
docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver#4751 · 3 comentarios · 2 asignados ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
other: ARC was marked as deprecated - meet DKIM2Quizá libre de nuevo @georglauterbach la tomó hace 76 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abiertoarea/security kind/update meta/needs triage service/security/dkim-dmarc-spf stale-bot/ignore
docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver#4740 · 1 comentario · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver
Issues similares
-
bug good first issue help wanted
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
ysb3996-blip/oops#24 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
severity: low
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
luainkernel/lunatik#2221 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
priority middle
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
KATO-Hiro/AtCoderClans#12945 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
needs-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
mattpocock/skills#1360 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
Niko1221/Strata#4779 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días