Bundle deploy of an AI/BI dashboard breaks viewers' private bookmarks (UI save + publish does not)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- go
- Área
- backend-api-design, cli
Línea de trabajo
Start by tracing how databricks bundle deploy updates Lakeview dashboard drafts, then compare that path with databricks lakeview publish and the UI save behavior described here. The payload does not name source files or tests, so locate the dashboard update implementation and its coverage first. Done means an unchanged-content deploy preserves viewers’ private bookmarks, with a regression test covering the reported reproduction.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Describe the issue
Deploying an AI/BI dashboard with databricks bundle deploy breaks every viewer's private bookmarks on the published dashboard, even when the deployed content is identical to what's already there. After the deploy, each private bookmark that had saved filter values shows a warning icon: "N widgets are no longer available" (N = the dashboard's filter widgets, which keep the same widget names in the file).
A save + publish from the dashboard editor in the UI does not break them, and neither does calling only the publish step (databricks lakeview publish) on an unchanged draft. So it looks like updating the draft through the API (which the bundle deploy does before publishing) regenerates whatever internal widget identity private bookmarks refer to, while a UI save keeps it. The exported serialized_dashboard carries no extra identifiers we could preserve in the file: diffing the UI-saved draft against our file shows only the edit that was made.
This may sit in the Lakeview update API rather than the CLI, but bundles are where it bites: every CI deploy that touches a dashboard breaks all its viewers' private bookmarks.
Configuration
resources:
dashboards:
my_dashboard:
display_name: My Dashboard
file_path: ./my_dashboard.lvdash.json
warehouse_id: ${var.warehouse_id}
dataset_catalog: ${var.catalog}
embed_credentials: false
Dashboard with ~11 filter widgets (single- and multi-select) on a global filters page.
Steps to reproduce the behavior
databricks bundle deploythe dashboard.- Open the published dashboard, change a filter value, and save a private bookmark.
- Run
databricks lakeview publish <id> --warehouse-id <wh>(draft unchanged). Bookmark still works. - Re-save the
.lvdash.jsonwith only whitespace changes (identical JSON content) and rundatabricks bundle deploy. The draft is updated and republished. - Reload the published dashboard: the private bookmark shows the warning icon, "N widgets are no longer available".
For comparison: edit a widget title in the UI draft and publish from the UI. A private bookmark created beforehand keeps working.
Expected Behavior
Private bookmarks keep working after a bundle deploy when the filter widgets (same names) still exist, the same as after a UI save and publish.
Actual Behavior
All private bookmarks with saved filter values break after any bundle deploy that updates the dashboard, including a deploy with identical content.
OS and CLI version
Databricks CLI v0.298.0, macOS, Terraform deployment engine (default).
Is this a regression?
Unknown. Private bookmarks are new (October 2026 release notes).
Debug Logs
Can provide redacted logs if useful.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 427
- Forks
- 267
- Merge medio
- 2 d 1 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 233
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Sin guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de databricks/cli
-
Apps commands only accept relative path to app.ymlPosiblemente ocupada @yuri-rod la tomó hace 38 días. AbiertoCLI
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
databricks/cli#6910 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
DABs
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
databricks/cli#6670 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Bump vulnerable dependencies workflow is failingPosiblemente ocupada @shreyas-goenka la tomó hoy. Abiertobump-vuln-deps-failure
databricks/cli#7531 · 1 comentario · 7 asignados ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bundle run on an app fails with "not in RUNNING state" when the app's compute is UPDATINGPosiblemente ocupada @andrewnester la tomó hace 1 día. AbiertoBug DABs
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
databricks/cli#7451 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
databricks/cli#7387 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de databricks/cli
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
kind/features
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
TencentBlueKing/bk-nodemgr#3991 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
meta
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
last9/last9-mcp-server#554 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
-
Plain-http federation signing external_url fails startup with "invalid federation request signature"Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día