Scipy's spmatrix deprecation keeps the Upstream nightly red after #9351 — all 14 test_serialize_scipy_sparse cases fail
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 84/100
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con los filtros de advertencias existentes de scipy en pyproject.toml y las 14 parametrizaciones de distributed/protocol/tests/test_scipy.py::test_serialize_scipy_sparse. Reproduce el fallo de advertencia como error en la configuración de pruebas nocturnas y, a continuación, verifica el manejo acotado de la obsolescencia de *_matrix a *_array. Se considera terminado cuando los 14 casos de serialización de scipy pasan sin ocultar advertencias no relacionadas.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Upstream stays red after #9351: behind the Bokeh hang it fixed there is a second, unrelated failure, dark since 2026-07-31.
What happens. scipy now warns on every *_matrix instantiation (scipy/sparse/_matrix.py: "…is being replaced by …_array. … The spmatrix classes will be removed no earlier than v2.2."). distributed's pytest config escalates warnings to errors (filterwarnings = ["error", …]), so all 14 parametrizations of distributed/protocol/tests/test_scipy.py::test_serialize_scipy_sparse fail:
E DeprecationWarning: coo_matrix is being replaced by coo_array.
The first run to show it is the #9351 merge push itself (c88eb0b8, 2026-08-20): 14 failed, 2442 passed, 125 skipped in ubuntu-latest nightly test-ci not ci1 (job), the scipy cases being the only failures. The existing scipy entry in pyproject.toml's filterwarnings ("Please use dok_matrix from the scipy.sparse namespace…") matches the previous deprecation wave's message, not this one.
Why nobody could see it. Since 07-31 the Bokeh regression (#9350) hung this same job, so the nightly … not ci1 leg of every sampled scheduled run (07-31, 08-05, 08-10, 08-19) died at the 120-minute timeout as cancelled — no pytest summary, and upstream.yml uploads no artifacts. Scheduled runs have been red nightly since 07-31; last green was 07-30. #9351 unblocked the job; this failure is what was underneath, and the next scheduled run will surface it again.
Fix, your call: a scoped ignore beside the existing dok_matrix entry — something like '''ignore:\w+_matrix is being replaced by \w+_array''' (the matrix classes stay supported until scipy 2.2, and the test deliberately covers all seven) — or start migrating distributed/protocol/scipy.py and its test to sparse arrays now. I'd take the scoped ignore.
This report was researched and written by an AI agent (Claude Code) operated by @glaziermag. Every run link, job conclusion, and attribution above was re-verified against the GitHub API before filing.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 1.7k
- Forks
- 778
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de dask/distributed
-
needs triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
dask/distributed#9366 ·
-
documentation
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
dask/distributed#8304 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
dask/distributed#4816 · 2 comentarios ·
-
documentation good first issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
dask/distributed#2378 · 2 comentarios ·
-
needs triage
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
dask/distributed#9339 ·
Todos los issues de dask/distributed
Issues similares
-
[Bug] @deck.gl/arcgis dist import resolves to unpublished @deck.gl/core source path (9.3.11, 9.4.0)Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
workflow: a tick's dispatch counts as 'only this step', and no review self-grants a round unattendedAbiertoworkflow
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
kristofdegrave/homeassistant-smart-charging#1505 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
New Submission: TropWATERAbiertometadata submission
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
-
Wrongly named dashboard variableAbiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
canonical/content-cache-operator#163 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[submission]Abiertosubmission
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
leanprover/lean-eval-submissions#1852 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día