Python: `.get()`/`.update()` on a typed project-class instance get no edge (dropped as builtins)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 40/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- python, typescript
- Área
- tooling
Línea de trabajo
Start with isBuiltInOrExternal and PYTHON_BUILT_IN_METHODS in src/resolution/index.ts, where the Python builtin-method filter drops dotted refs before matchMethodCall runs. Reproduce with the two-file example (loader.py and test_packs.py) and check which calls get edges. Done means lines 6, 11 and 12 resolve to SystemPackRegistry::get and ::update while the module-scope d = {}; d.get(...) case stays dropped.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
In Python, a call to a project method named like a builtin collection method (get, update, items, pop, …) is dropped as a builtin unless the receiver variable's name, capitalized, is the name of a project class. This happens even when the receiver's type is known: reg = SystemPackRegistry(); reg.get("y") gets no edge, while the same code with the methods renamed, or with the variable named systemPackRegistry, resolves at 0.9.
Reproduction (verified)
On main at 8fe31569, built from source, Linux (WSL2), Node 22.23.2, WASM extractor (CODEGRAPH_KERNEL=0). Two files:
# loader.py
class SystemPackRegistry:
def get(self, pack_id):
return pack_id
def update(self):
return None
def load_registry() -> SystemPackRegistry:
return SystemPackRegistry()
# test_packs.py
from loader import SystemPackRegistry, load_registry
def test_pack():
registry = load_registry()
return registry.get("x") # line 6
def test_ctor():
reg = SystemPackRegistry()
reg.update() # line 11
return reg.get("y") # line 12
codegraph init -i, then the calls / imports / instantiates edges:
load_registry -instantiates-> SystemPackRegistry [loader.py:1] @10 exact-match/0.9
test_packs.py -imports-> SystemPackRegistry [loader.py:1] @1 import/0.9
test_packs.py -imports-> load_registry [loader.py:9] @1 import/0.9
test_pack -calls-> load_registry [loader.py:9] @5 import/0.9
test_ctor -instantiates-> SystemPackRegistry [loader.py:1] @10 import/0.9
There is no edge for lines 6, 11 or 12.
Expected: test_ctor -calls-> SystemPackRegistry::update (line 11) and -> SystemPackRegistry::get (line 12), and test_pack -calls-> SystemPackRegistry::get (line 6), as in the controls below.
Controls, same build:
| Change | Line 6 | Line 11 | Line 12 |
|---|---|---|---|
| as above | none | none | none |
methods renamed get→lookup, update→refresh |
SystemPackRegistry::lookup instance-method/0.7 |
SystemPackRegistry::refresh instance-method/0.9 |
SystemPackRegistry::lookup instance-method/0.9 |
reg renamed systemPackRegistry |
none | SystemPackRegistry::update instance-method/0.9 |
SystemPackRegistry::get instance-method/0.9 |
So the resolver can type both receivers, but the builtin filter runs first and decides from the variable's name alone.
Likely cause (inferred from reading the code)
isBuiltInOrExternal runs before any resolution strategy. For a dotted Python ref whose method is in PYTHON_BUILT_IN_METHODS (get, update, items, pop, read, write, close, …), it keeps the ref only if the capitalized receiver (reg → Reg) is a project class name, or the receiver is an imported project module (#1681). Otherwise it returns true, and the ref is discarded before matchMethodCall can infer the receiver's type from reg = SystemPackRegistry() or -> SystemPackRegistry.
One option is to leave these refs to matchMethodCall when the receiver has a local declaration that the existing receiver-type inference can type, and drop them only when it can't.
Related
- #1681 / #1749: the same filter dropped
module.append()on an imported project module. The fix added the project-module exception, not a typed-receiver one. - #1652 / #1776: the filter's module-scope collection check (
d = {}thend.get(...)). That case should still be dropped. - #1230: the original Python builtin-name false positives this filter guards against.
- #1947 (open PR): the opposite direction, library-method names on untyped receivers binding to project methods. This issue is about typed receivers losing real edges.
A build of the inth3shadows fork that carries open PRs #1704 and #1926 gives the same output.
Not checked
- Other names in the set (
items,pop,read,close, …); onlygetandupdatewere run. self.<attr>.get()and parameters annotated with the class (def f(reg: SystemPackRegistry)).- The native kernel extractor (only
CODEGRAPH_KERNEL=0was run). - Windows and macOS.
- Lenguaje dominante
- C
- Estrellas
- 73.2k
- Forks
- 4.7k
- Merge medio
- 2 h 13 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 418
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de colbymchenry/codegraph
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
colbymchenry/codegraph#2634 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Windows: bundled Node v24.16.0 can abort at exit (nodejs/node#56645); please bundle Node >= 24.20.0Posiblemente ocupada @Ancienttwo la tomó hace 2 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
colbymchenry/codegraph#2617 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Invalid regular expression: /\boperator++\s*(?:<[^<>()]*>)?\s*\(/: Nothing to repeat (v1.6.2)Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
colbymchenry/codegraph#2482 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
codegraph ui - does not workAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
colbymchenry/codegraph#1900 · 2 comentarios · 5 reacciones ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
colbymchenry/codegraph#1700 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de colbymchenry/codegraph
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
OpenPrinting/cups#1772 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
snowballstem/snowball#311 ·
-
tech-debt
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100