Design: freeze a session's program group atomically (cgroup freezer)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- linux, typescript
- Área
- cli, operating-systems
Línea de trabajo
Start with docs/USAGE.md, the host process-spawning and session-recording code, and the TLA+ lifecycle model at .agents/skills/verify-session-lifecycle. First evaluate delegated cgroup availability in the listed target environments and how a recorded cgroup path can be verified across processes, including sessions created by older versions. Done means an ADR documents the mechanism, fallback, and measurements; both stated gaps are addressed where supported; the model checks the lifecycle rules; and docs/USAGE.md explains remaining limits.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Design: freeze a session's program group atomically (cgroup freezer), so destroy and gc cannot miss a fork chain.
Problem
destroy and gc end a session's program group by reading /proc, proving that the group is the session's, and killing it. A fork chain (processes that each fork a successor and exit within a few ms) can end between two reads. Since #326, #333 and #334, agent-tty sends such a group SIGSTOP, so its processes stay in view, and judges it again. SIGSTOP and the reads are separate system calls, so this remains a heuristic. Two gaps are left, and docs/USAGE.md documents both (Limits 3 and 5, and the fork-chain paragraph under destroy):
- A missed chain under a PID 1 that never reaps. When another process sends the group SIGCONT before each of the 5 freeze checks, the freeze misses the chain. Normally the wait then still finds the group id, and
destroyfails withHOST_TIMEOUT. Under a PID 1 that never reaps, the scans show only zombies, the group reads ended, anddestroyreports success while the chain still runs.gchas the same limit after its 20 frozen checks. - A false
HOST_TIMEOUT(since #334). The CLI's/procbelongs to another pid namespace, the session has no autogroup record (or uses an oldchildPidrecord), and a PID 1 that never reaps keeps the zombies. Thendestroyfails withHOST_TIMEOUTalthough the program has ended. Before #334,destroyrecordeddestroyedthere. I reproduced both sides with a real CLI undersudo unshare --pid --forkwithout--mount-proc(see #335).
A comment on 2026-11-03 in this work already concluded that a freeze without these gaps "needs the cgroup freezer or ptrace".
Direction to evaluate
- Put each session's program in its own cgroup v2 leaf (for example under the user's delegated systemd scope) when the host spawns it.
cgroup.freezethen freezes every member at once,cgroup.procslists the members without a/procscan, andcgroup.kill(Linux 5.14+) kills them all in one call. Membership is inherited on fork, so a chain cannot escape it. - Keep the current autogroup and SIGSTOP path as the fallback where no writable delegated cgroup exists (containers without delegation, older kernels, macOS, Windows).
- Questions to answer first: does a delegated cgroup exist in the environments agent-tty targets (CI runners, Coder workspaces, Docker with and without
--cgroupns)? How does the host record the cgroup path so thatdestroyfrom another process can prove it is the session's (ahost.json/program.jsonfield, and model checks for it)? What happens to a session that a version without this feature started? - The TLA+ lifecycle model (
.agents/skills/verify-session-lifecycle) needs an action for the cgroup path, and the rulesDestroyedProgramStoppedand the gc rules must hold with it.
Done when
- A design note (ADR under
docs/adr/) chooses the mechanism and the fallback, with measurements from the target environments. - Both gaps above are closed where the mechanism is available, and the model check covers them.
docs/USAGE.mdstates where the old limits still apply.
Generated with xum • Model: anthropic:claude-opus-5-5 • Thinking: high
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 30
- Forks
- 4
- Merge medio
- 3 h 19 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 107
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de coder/agent-tty
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 38/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 30/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de coder/agent-tty
Issues similares
-
bug needs-triage potential-regression
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
aws/aws-sdk-js-v3#8408 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
colinhacks/zod#6743 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[BUG] Packing list: the weight field drops digits on a slow connection and saves the wrong weightAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 79/100
openai/openai-node#3124 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
anthropics/anthropic-sdk-typescript#1296 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 8 días