Bug: Dependency Trees overflows the call stack on cyclic SBOM dependency graphs
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 68/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- spring-boot, typescript
- Área
- frontend
Línea de trabajo
Start with spring-boot-admin-server-ui/src/main/frontend/views/instances/sbomdependencytrees/sbomUtils.ts, especially getChildren() and retrieveChildren(), then inspect tree.spec.ts for the existing normalization and rendering tests. Reproduce the minimal cyclic input and add coverage for cycles, self-references, acyclic chains, and shared dependencies. Done means finite cycle-marked output, preserved repeated shared nodes, and working filtering and rerendering without a stack overflow.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Spring Boot Admin Server information
- Version: 4.1.3
- Spring Boot version: 4.1.1
Client information
- Spring Boot versions: 3.5.10
- SBOM format: CycloneDX JSON
Description
The SBOM Dependency Trees normalizer recursively expands dependency references without tracking ancestors. When the input graph contains a reachable cycle, expansion never terminates normally and throws RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded.
This was reproduced in isolation against the executable normalization logic from 4.1.3 and master inspected on 2026-10-03. A self-reference also reproduces the failure. A full SBA browser integration test was not run for this report.
Regardless of how a producer generated a cyclic graph, the viewer should handle it without exhausting the JavaScript call stack. Removing BOM/POM components from the input should not be necessary to prevent the viewer from failing.
Minimal input
{
"bomFormat": "CycloneDX",
"specVersion": "1.6",
"version": 1,
"metadata": {
"component": { "type": "application", "bom-ref": "app", "name": "demo-app", "version": "1.0.0" }
},
"components": [
{ "type": "library", "bom-ref": "a", "name": "library-a", "version": "1.0.0" },
{ "type": "library", "bom-ref": "b", "name": "library-b", "version": "1.0.0" }
],
"dependencies": [
{ "ref": "app", "dependsOn": ["a"] },
{ "ref": "a", "dependsOn": ["b"] },
{ "ref": "b", "dependsOn": ["a"] }
]
}
Reproduction and actual behavior
Pass this document's dependencies to normalizeData() in sbomUtils.ts. It throws Maximum call stack size exceeded while expanding app -> a -> b -> a -> ....
For UI reproduction, serve the document through the monitored application's SBOM endpoint, or mock instance.fetchSbom() in tree.spec.ts, and open Dependency Trees. Normalization fails before a finite tree can be passed to the D3 renderer.
Expected behavior
Render a finite representation of the reachable graph. For example, show a terminal node/reference marked as a cycle when a dependency points back to an ancestor:
app
└── a
└── b
└── a [cycle; not expanded again]
An explicit controlled diagnostic would also be preferable to a stack overflow, but retaining the rest of the graph would make the view more useful.
Cause and proposed fix
getChildren() and retrieveChildren() in 4.1.3 call each other without an ancestor/recursion-path guard.
- Index dependency records by their exact
ref. - Track references on the current traversal path, including the root.
- If the next reference is already on that path, create a terminal cycle/reference node rather than expanding it again.
- Use full references for identity; normalized labels can collide.
- Do not use a global visited set to suppress all repeated nodes. A shared dependency in two independent branches is not a cycle and should remain visible under both parents.
- Keep the resulting object structure acyclic for D3, and preserve the original SBOM graph.
- Consider an explicit stack or controlled expansion limits for very deep graphs / large numbers of repeated paths; cycle detection alone does not bound all work.
Regression cases should include a two-node cycle, self-reference, an edge back to the application root, an ordinary acyclic chain, and a diamond (app -> a,b, a -> c, b -> c) where c is shown in both branches. Filtering and rerendering should still work with cycle markers.
Related reports
There is a separate root-selection defect where dependencies[0] is treated as the root. Correcting it can make previously hidden cycles reachable. [#5745]
#5157 fixes an alert displayed during SBOM loading; it does not add cycle detection to dependency traversal.
I would be happy to contribute a PR targeting master, covering both root selection and cycle-safe traversal if preferred.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Java
- Estrellas
- 12.9k
- Forks
- 3.2k
- Merge medio
- 23 h 31 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 72
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de codecentric/spring-boot-admin
-
Bug: Dependency Trees uses dependencies[0] as root instead of metadata.component.bom-refPosiblemente ocupada @faystmax la tomó hace 4 días. Abierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
codecentric/spring-boot-admin#5745 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
codecentric/spring-boot-admin#5743 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Bug: Filtering rules are not synchronized between SBA nodesPosiblemente ocupada @SteKoe la tomó hace 6 días. Abierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
codecentric/spring-boot-admin#5721 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Bug: Multiple notifications from multiple instancesPosiblemente ocupada @YadavKshitiz la tomó hace 9 días. Abierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 55/100
codecentric/spring-boot-admin#5716 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 52/100
codecentric/spring-boot-admin#5597 · 6 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de codecentric/spring-boot-admin
Issues similares
-
waiting-for-triage
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
spring-cloud/spring-cloud-openfeign#1443 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
ADORSYS-GIS/keycloak-oid4vp-plugin#221 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Upgrade to Spring Pulsar 2.0.8Abiertostatus: team-only type: dependency-upgrade
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
spring-projects/spring-boot#52099 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
tchiotludo/akhq#3307 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
objectionary/jeo-maven-plugin#1885 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días