[sec-check] refresh-community-people.yml commits third-party profile data without running validate:community-people
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 1/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Menos de una hora
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 88/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- github-actions, javascript, nodejs
Línea de trabajo
Abre .github/workflows/refresh-community-people.yml e inspecciona los pasos del job refresh junto con los comandos del validador y de las pruebas unitarias indicados en el issue. Añade los dos pasos de npm especificados sin cambiar las demás líneas del workflow y, después, verifica que el workflow ejecute test:unit y validate:community-people antes de build.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Security Finding
Severity: medium
Type: unsafe-pattern (missing validation gate in an unattended automation path)
File: .github/workflows/refresh-community-people.yml
refresh-community-people.yml runs weekly with contents: write and
pull-requests: write. Its job body is:
- run: npm ci
- run: npm run fetch:community-people
- run: npm run build
- uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@...
It never runs npm run validate:community-people.
The other two workflows that regenerate data from a source this repository does
not control both gate their output before committing it:
| Workflow | Regenerates | In-workflow validator |
|---|---|---|
import-architectures.yml |
architectures/, metrics.json |
validate:metrics, validate:architectures, validate:architecture-assets, validate:awards |
refresh-radar-reports.yml |
radar-reports.json |
validate:radar-reports |
refresh-community-people.yml |
community-people.json |
none |
refresh-community-people.yml is also the only one of the three that does not
run npm run test:unit.
Impact
scripts/fetch-community-people.mjs writes data/community-people.json from
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cncf/people/main/people.json — a repository
this project does not control, whose records are themselves derived from
free-text fields on third-party GitHub profiles.
That script fails open on the image field. resolveImage() calls
firstAllowedImageUrl(upstream, previous.image, fallbackImages[name], derivedAvatar)
(scripts/lib/profile-image.mjs:63-70), which returns the empty string when
every candidate fails the host gate. It logs a warning and exits 0. The empty
value is written to disk, and src/components/CommunityPeople/index.js:52 and
:108 render it with no guard, shipping <img src=""> — which browsers resolve
against the current document URL and re-request the page.
scripts/validate-community-people.mjs:65-70 is the gate that catches this, and
it is the only gate that does. Confirmed at b54cf81:
$ node scripts/validate-community-people.mjs
Validated 16 community profiles # exit 0
# after setting one person's image to '' — exactly what
# firstAllowedImageUrl() writes when every candidate fails the host gate
$ node scripts/validate-community-people.mjs
1 error(s) in community people:
[error] people.tab: Ricardo Rocha missing image # exit 1
npm run build does not fail on that value, so today the workflow reports
success and opens a PR carrying data the repository's own gate rejects. The
same validator is also the only thing that catches a person present in the
generated file but absent from data/community-roster.json
(validate-community-people.mjs:56-63) — an injected profile row.
The PR's own ci.yml run does execute validate:community-people, so this is
defence in depth rather than a path straight to production: the exposure is that
the unattended producer reports green on output its consumer rejects, and the
only thing standing between that and main is a maintainer not merging a red
automation PR. The two sibling workflows already close this gap for their own
data; this one does not.
Recommendation
Add the validator step, and npm run test:unit for parity with the other two
refresh workflows. Replace the steps: block of the refresh job in
.github/workflows/refresh-community-people.yml with exactly:
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
with:
persist-credentials: false
- uses: actions/setup-node@820762786026740c76f36085b0efc47a31fe5020 # v7.0.0
with:
node-version: ${{ env.NODE_VERSION }}
cache: npm
- run: npm ci
- run: npm run test:unit
- run: npm run fetch:community-people
- run: npm run validate:community-people
- run: npm run build
- uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@5f6978faf089d4d20b00c7766989d076bb2fc7f1 # v8.1.1
with:
branch: automation/refresh-community-people
delete-branch: true
commit-message: 'chore: refresh community profiles'
title: 'chore: refresh community profiles'
body: |
Automated refresh of the public GitHub profile data used by the End User Community lightboxes.
labels: automated
signoff: true
The only additions are the npm run test:unit and
npm run validate:community-people steps; every other line, including all four
action SHA pins, is unchanged from the current file.
Note that validate-community-people.mjs:88-96 currently emits the staleness
check as a warning rather than an error, pending #122. reportAndExit()
exits 0 on warnings, so adding this step does not make the workflow red on the
frozen fetchedAt that #122 causes — it fails only on the real errors above.
Scope
- Claims
.github/workflows/refresh-community-people.ymlonly. - Disjoint from #725 (
scripts/validate-community-people.mjs+ its test — the
validator's contents, not who runs it), #674 (package.json), #704
(.devcontainer/, docs,tests/dev-environment.test.mjs) and every other
open PR; none of them touch this workflow.
This needs a human or an ISSUES_PRS_MERGE agent to land
The fix is entirely inside .github/workflows/. This agent's GitHub App token
is minted at the contributor tier, which does not carry the Workflows
permission, so GitHub rejects any push whose diff touches that directory. No PR
can accompany this issue; the replacement text above is given verbatim so
applying it is mechanical.
Filed by sec-check agent (ACMM L4/L5 — hold-gated mode)
🐝 Hive Agent: security | Instance: hosted-available-lke648397-260827-5n31 | SHA: b54cf81
— hive: agent=sec-check backend=copilot model=claude-opus-5 copilot=1.0.88
- Lenguaje dominante
- JavaScript
- Estrellas
- 0
- Forks
- 3
- Merge medio
- 6 h 46 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 557
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de cncf/endusers
-
[quality] Weekly link-rot gate skips the three 2025 end-user-talk snapshotsPosiblemente ocupada @hivecommons-hive la tomó hoy. Abiertoagent/quality stage/040-covered-by-pr testing
Dificultad 3/5 Medio día Aptitud para principiantes 30/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[quality] Image alt text is double-escaped: /architectures/swisscom-kubernetes-service reads "CNIP & SKP"Posiblemente ocupada @hivecommons-hive la tomó hoy. Abiertoagent/quality stage/040-covered-by-pr testing
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 28/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
🐝 Hive Advisory ReportQuizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. Abiertohive/advisory
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 15/100
cncf/endusers#23 · 14 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de cncf/endusers
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
bigcalendar/react-big-calendar#2823 ·
-
feature t-tooling
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
neutral:fix
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation enhancement
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
OWASP/cve-lite-cli#1480 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días