Make gc() reachable so orphaned blobs and manifests are actually reclaimed
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Stack tecnológico
- sqlite, typescript
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con packages/dofs/src/fs/gc.ts y packages/dofs/src/index.ts; después inspecciona el punto de entrada de Workspace en packages/computer/src/workspace.ts y las pruebas de gc existentes. Determina si la limpieza depende del llamador, se basa en alarmas o es oportunista, expón el punto de entrada elegido y su resultado, y actualiza los cuatro comentarios y las pruebas para que se recuperen las filas huérfanas mientras los blobs vinculados permanecen intactos.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
packages/dofs/src/fs/gc.ts implements orphan reclamation for vfs_blobs and vfs_manifests. It is transactional, it has a one-hour safety window, it has unit tests, and the schema carries a partial index added specifically to keep its manifest sweep from being quadratic. It is not exported and nothing calls it, so no orphan is ever reclaimed.
Filing as an issue because CONTRIBUTING.md routes feature requests to Discussions and Discussions are not enabled on this repo, so the documented link 404s (#53). Happy to move this to a Discussion if that gets turned on.
Background and motivation
Verified against main at 76d9e75:
gcis not exported frompackages/dofs/src/index.ts. That file exports 30-plus symbols including every sync building block (applyChanges,coalesceChanges,fetchChanges,stageBlob,writeWatermark,buildManifest).gcis absent.packages/dofs/package.jsonexposes only"."and"./testing", so there is no deep import path either.- Searching for
gc(acrosspackages, excludingfs/gc.tsand tests, returns four hits, and all four are comments.
Those four comments are the reason this matters. Three of them are load-bearing justifications for leaving garbage behind:
packages/dofs/src/fs/writeFile.ts:138- "Failure mid-stream leaves blob rows behind;gc()reaps orphans on a later pass."packages/dofs/src/fs/writeFile.ts:152- "orphan blob rows thatgc()then has to reap."packages/dofs/src/fs/writeFile.ts:961- "are cleaned up by a latergc()pass."packages/computer/src/mounts/types.ts:26- "rows may briefly linger and are reaped bygc()."
There is no later pass. Every interrupted or failed streaming write leaks blob rows, and the bytes go with them through the vfs_blob_bytes foreign key. In a Durable Object, where SQLite is the durable substrate and storage is finite, a cleanup that is documented but never runs is a slow leak with no operator remedy short of recreating the workspace.
The surrounding evidence suggests this is an oversight rather than a decision:
gc.ts:20-53runs both deletes in onedb.transactionSync, withDEFAULT_SAFETY_WINDOW_MSof one hour and the comment that the generous default exists so "a misconfigured GC pass cannot wipe blobs the application is actively writing." That is operational thinking, not dead code.packages/dofs/src/schema/core.ts:51-57adds the partial indexvfs_nodes_by_manifest_hashwith the comment: "gc/manifests checks every manifest row against vfs_nodes via a correlated NOT EXISTS [...] Without this index gc full-scans vfs_nodes per candidate manifest - O(N x M)." Schema work was done for a function that cannot run.packages/dofs/src/sync/blobs.ts:10hasstageBlobtouchlast_seen"so the bytes don't get reaped by an interleaved gc," so the sync path already coordinates with it.packages/dofs/README.mdnotes thesrc/fs/*primitives,gcamong them, "are not re-exported from the package root yet."
Goals
-
Make
gcreachable: exportgc,GcOptions, andGcResultfrom the@cloudflare/dofspackage root, alongside the sync building blocks already exported there. No behaviour change. -
Give it a host-side entry point on
Workspacethat runs the sweep and returns{ blobsFreed, manifestsFreed }, so a consumer can reclaim on its own schedule and observe what was freed. -
Decide who triggers it. This is the part I would rather ask than assume, and it is the part that actually closes the leak. Three options with different cost profiles:
- Caller-driven only. Smallest change, no policy baked in, but the leak persists for every consumer who does not know to call it.
- A Durable Object alarm. The natural home for periodic maintenance, but
packages/computer/src/workspace.ts:57notes a backend "cannot own a Durable Object alarm. Each backend has at most one intent," and the container keep-alive already uses alarms, so the alarm is contended. - Opportunistic, after a sync tick or the post-exec pull, guarded by the existing one-hour
last_seenwindow plus a cheap "anything deleted since last sweep" check so an idle workspace does no work. Cheapest to reason about, but adds work to a latency-sensitive path.
The safety window means correctness does not depend much on the choice; cost and latency do.
-
Make the four comments true. If the answer is caller-driven only, they should be amended to say the caller is responsible, so the code stops asserting a cleanup the library does not perform.
Out of scope: no change to gc's predicates, safety window, or transaction shape. It looks correct as written; it is only unreachable. Tombstone pruning in vfs_changes is a separate gap I am filing alongside this one.
Deleting gc and its index instead is a coherent alternative if orphans are considered acceptable, and worth naming so the decision is explicit. It would mean rewriting the four comments and accepting the leak from interrupted writes.
Example
// packages/dofs/src/index.ts - currently absent
export { gc, type GcOptions, type GcResult } from "./fs/gc.js";
// host-side entry point
const { blobsFreed, manifestsFreed } = await workspace.gc();
For tests, the now injection already in GcOptions exists so the clock can be pinned, so no new test infrastructure is needed. The coverage worth adding is the reachability regression that would have caught the current state (importing gc from the package root and running it), plus driving an interrupted streaming write through the writeFile.ts:138 path, asserting orphan rows exist, sweeping past the safety window, and asserting they are gone while linked blobs are untouched.
Happy to open a PR for the export and the entry point if that direction works, and to hold the trigger question until you have picked one.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 9.3k
- Forks
- 535
- Merge medio
- 1 d 19 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 19
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de cloudflare/computer
-
computerd: let paths that match .gitignore stay on the container's disk instead of syncing to the Durable ObjectPosiblemente ocupada @aron-cf la tomó hace 1 día. Abiertoenhancement
cloudflare/computer#179 · 1 comentario · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
CloudflareContainerBackend: pass image, instance and containerSnapshot to ctx.container.start() for the durable_object scheduling policyPosiblemente ocupada @aron-cf la tomó hace 2 días. Abierto
cloudflare/computer#176 · 1 reacción · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Upstream deletes from the container are dropped as stale: tombstoneIsStale compares revs from different peers' rev spacesPosiblemente ocupada @aron-cf la tomó hace 3 días. Abiertobug
cloudflare/computer#167 · 5 comentarios · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
git: cherry-pick, rebase and pull --rebasePosiblemente ocupada @aron-cf la tomó hace 26 días. Abiertoenhancement
cloudflare/computer#129 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
cloudflare/computer#106 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de cloudflare/computer
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
betagouv/mon-entreprise#4699 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
jaegertracing/jaeger-ui#4547 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
ai-driven-qa
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
linagora/twake-calendar-frontend#1467 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
need4deed-org/sdk#267 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
auth0/universal-login#414 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día