iOS: type/fill still reads its pre-focus element after the focus tap, ending the runner session
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- swift
- Área
- mobile-dev, testing
Línea de trabajo
Start by reading RunnerTests+TextEntryFocus.swift and RunnerTests+TextEntry.swift, then use the --agent-device-text-entry-unqueryable-on-focus fixture to identify which post-focus read records the failure. Add a regression test that drives type or fill through execute(command:) and checks for success or a typed failure reason without a recorded XCTest failure. Also verify the moved-on-focus fixture and run pnpm check:xctest-selection; done means the new test is lane-reachable and the iOS PR lane stays green.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Summary
#3237 removed the post-dispatch element reads from the tap command (#3060). The report's fill @e6
row is a different seam and still fails: XCTEST_RECORDED_FAILURE "while executing type", measured at
4.5 s, separately from the tap rows at 7.7–12.8 s.
Same root mechanism — an element that stops answering the query that resolved it once it takes focus —
different owning path, so it was left out of #3237 to keep that change inside one command family.
Where the failure comes from
The type/fill focus path reads an element handle it resolved before its own focus tap, and the reads
live after the tap:
RunnerTests+TextEntryFocus.swift#focusTextInputForTextEntry(app:x:y:)resolves the input with
textInputAt(app:x:y:)(line 122), dispatches a focus tap, then builds its target from
textEntryRefreshPoint(for:), which readselement.frame(lines 140 and 160, helper at 165).RunnerTests+TextEntry.swift#moveCaretToEnd(element:)readselement.framebefore the caret edge-tap,
reached fromclearTextInputon a replacement fill.
.type is in the interaction group, so convertsRecordedFailure turns a recorded issue into
XCTEST_RECORDED_FAILURE, and the dispatch path invalidates the target with reason
xctest_recorded_failure. The report measured fill @e6 failing with "while executing type" in 4.5 s; it
did not measure whether that command's own focus tap landed, so this issue's premise is that the failure
comes from these reads rather than from the typing itself, which the first commit must confirm.
Which of these reads the report's fill actually reached is not established here. Measure it first: a
failed read records Failed to get matching snapshot: No matches found for … from input {(TextField)},
and safely catches an exception, so a read may also be swallowed rather than recorded.
Not in this list, because it cannot record: the witness read
safely("LAST_TAPPED_TEXT_INPUT_EXISTS", false, { element.exists }) (RunnerTests+TextEntryFocus.swift:52)
does become reachable on an unqueryable field once #3237 books the witness from pre-dispatch facts, but
exists was measured to record nothing on a handle whose element had left its query. It is a correct
fail-closed check, not part of this seam.
This is not the contained-probe path, and widening containment is not the fix: textInputAt reaches
queryTextInputs through safely, not through containingTextInputProbeIssues, and
testTextInputProbeContainmentExcludesRequiredReadsAndLaterIssues pins that a required read's failure
belongs to its caller.
Required behavior
#3237 settled this on the tap route by reading the element through snapshot() instead of
element.elementType/element.frame: the same query answer, delivered through the throwing channel,
which records nothing. Measured on a handle whose element had left its query — snapshot() records 0 and
throws 10008, where .elementType and .frame each record 1 and raise.
- Route
textEntryRefreshPoint(for:)andmoveCaretToEnd(element:)through asnapshot()read for the
type and frame they need. Where a stale frame cannot be trusted, the repo already refuses the shape:
clearTextInput's comment says an edge-tap computed from a frame the field moved after records a
failure or navigates away, so degrade to a route that needs no point or refuse with a typed reason
rather than dispatching one. - Keep every read that must distinguish absence from failure on
probeTextEntryInput, which is what tells
a proven no-match from a read that could not answer. - A fill whose field genuinely did not take focus must still fail, and a genuinely recorded failure must
still invalidate and surface. This removes reads that describe work already done, not evidence of work
that failed.
Observable completion conditions
- A regression test on the
--agent-device-text-entry-unqueryable-on-focusfixture added in #3237 drives
type/fillthroughexecute(command:)and asserts the command succeeds or fails with a typed reason
and thatdidRecordXCTestFailure(since:)is false. It must be red before the change, showing which read
records the issue. --agent-device-text-entry-moves-on-focusstill passes: a refresh point carried from a pre-focus
identity must not retarget a field that moved, which is whatTextInputAtPoint.identityand a target's
boundIdentityalready guard.pnpm check:xctest-selectionkeeps every new case reachable by a lane, and the iOS PR lane stays green.
Dependencies
- Prerequisite: #3237 (the tap-side fix, and the fixture this issue's test builds on).
- Related: #3060 (the report), #1599 (narrow-issue policy), #2273 (a failed selector query
indistinguishable from a true negative), #1605 (tap-failure corroboration).
Not in scope
Daemon tap-failure corroboration still compares an identity that includes the unstable element type, so
ios_tap_failure_corroboration_identity_mismatch remains the outcome whenever any seam records a tap
failure. That is the report's second ask and needs its own change to
src/daemon/interaction/internal/interaction-ios-tap-outcome.ts; do not fold it in here.
Line numbers above are as of a6f6af1 in #3237, which added a doc comment to RunnerTests+TextEntryFocus.swift and shifted them by a few lines. moveCaretToEnd is RunnerTests+TextEntry.swift:398 there.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 4.9k
- Forks
- 328
- Merge medio
- 12 h 19 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 549
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de callstack/agent-device
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
callstack/agent-device#1869 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 38/100
callstack/agent-device#3263 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 36/100
callstack/agent-device#3261 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
callstack/agent-device#3260 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
callstack/agent-device#3254 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de callstack/agent-device
Issues similares
-
enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Bug] remember() with special characters in namespace hangs until timeout instead of returning 400Abiertobug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
MystenLabs/MemWal#1133 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug user-priority/P2
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Effect-TS/effect#8881 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día