respond() intermittently never returns after parallel tool calls
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 28/100
Línea de trabajo
Start by running the reproduction script repeatedly and instrumenting LanguageModelSession.respond() around tool completion. The issue points at Tool._c_callback_impl, _run_in_thread, and FMBridgedToolFinishCall, so trace how each parallel callback finishes and how completion is signalled back to the awaiting response. The fix is confirmed when the script completes consistently and the callback-thread event-loop behavior is either corrected or documented.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
LanguageModelSession.respond() intermittently never returns after the model issues several tool calls in one response. Every tool callback has already finished, no further callback arrives, and the awaited response never completes. Only an outer timeout ends it. It happens whether or not the tool calls raise.
Environment
- apple-fm-sdk 0.2.1
- macOS 27.0.1 (26A434), Apple M4
- Python 3.14.10
Reproduction
The script below uses only the SDK. The model is asked to create five files and requests five write calls in one response. In this version the tool raises from the third call onward; changing count > 2 to count > 1000 makes every call succeed, which also hangs (see below). Run it repeatedly.
import asyncio
import tempfile
import threading
import time
from pathlib import Path
import apple_fm_sdk as fm
from apple_fm_sdk.generation_property import Property
from apple_fm_sdk.generation_schema import GenerationSchema
calls: list[float] = []
lock = threading.Lock()
class Write(fm.Tool):
name = "write"
description = "Create a new text file with the given content."
@property
def arguments_schema(self) -> GenerationSchema:
return GenerationSchema(
type_class=type("WriteArguments", (), {}),
description="File to create",
properties=[
Property(name="path", type_class=str, description="File path"),
Property(name="content", type_class=str, description="File content"),
],
)
async def call(self, args: fm.GeneratedContent) -> str:
with lock:
calls.append(time.perf_counter())
count = len(calls)
if count > 2: # Calls 3+ fail; use count > 1000 to make every call succeed.
raise RuntimeError("tool-call budget exhausted")
path = Path(args.value(for_property="path"))
path.write_text(args.value(for_property="content"))
return "created"
async def main() -> None:
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as directory:
session = fm.LanguageModelSession(
instructions="Use an available tool when it can answer.",
tools=[Write()],
)
started = time.perf_counter()
try:
async with asyncio.timeout(45):
await session.respond(
f"Create five files named one.txt through five.txt in "
f"{directory}, each containing its own number."
)
print(f"done in {time.perf_counter() - started:.0f}s, calls={len(calls)}")
except TimeoutError:
alive = [thread.name for thread in threading.enumerate()]
print(f"HUNG: calls={len(calls)}, live threads={alive}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
Observed
| Variant | Runs that hung |
|---|---|
| Script as shown: calls 3–5 raise | 2 of 15 |
count > 1000: all calls succeed |
1 of 15 |
A normal run finishes in 10–15 s. In every hang:
- all five callbacks had run, and no further callback arrived in the remaining ~30 s;
- only
MainThreadwas alive, so every_run_in_threadcallback thread had finished, including itsFMBridgedToolFinishCall; - the awaited
respond()never completed.
The five callbacks run on separate threads and finish close together, so a race in the native bridge when several tool calls of one response complete concurrently seems plausible. I have not confirmed that.
Expected
respond() returns once the tool calls have completed, as it does in most runs.
Workaround
Wrapping respond() in asyncio.timeout(...) bounds the hang; cancellation works.
Related observation
Without a running event loop on the native callback thread, Tool._c_callback_impl runs each callback on a new event loop in a new thread (_run_in_thread). Objects bound to the caller's loop, such as an asyncio.Lock shared between tools or an MCP client session, then block or deadlock when used from a callback. Scheduling such work back onto the session's loop with run_coroutine_threadsafe works around it. If this behavior is intended, documenting it in the tool-calling docs would help; I can open a separate issue if useful.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 1.4k
- Forks
- 89
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de apple/python-apple-fm-sdk
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
apple/python-apple-fm-sdk#16 ·
-
Build fails with Command Line Tools only — Xcode.app should not be requiredPosiblemente ocupada @siva-acv la tomó hace 242 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
apple/python-apple-fm-sdk#6 · 2 comentarios · 3 reacciones ·
-
Add support for `LanguageModelFeedback` and `logFeedbackAttachment`Quizá libre de nuevo @mkery la tomó hace 243 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abierto
apple/python-apple-fm-sdk#5 · 1 comentario · 1 asignado ·
Todos los issues de apple/python-apple-fm-sdk
Issues similares
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:docs documentation effort:M ready-for-agent
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
mczielinski/ob-analytics#423 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
infra
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
documentation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
vllm-project/vllm-ascend#21033 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día