[Bug] transferToFsStore deletes POP KV records even when the checkpoint put fails, losing in-flight messages
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 62/100
Línea de trabajo
Start in PopConsumerService.transferToFsStore(), where the PutMessageResult from asyncPutMessage(ckMsg).join() is discarded before popConsumerStore.deleteRecords(consumerRecords) runs. Use handleCkMessagePutResult in PopBufferMergeService as the reference for which statuses count as success. The reproduction is PopConsumerServiceTest#transferToFsStoreTest with a stub returning SERVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE; done means that test shows the record still present after the put fails, and the retry loop no longer spins forever.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Before Creating the Bug Report
- This is a reproducible bug rather than a usage question.
- I searched open and closed issues, pull requests, and Discussions and found no duplicate.
- The affected code is in this RocketMQ repository.
Runtime platform environment
Linux x86_64. The reproduction is a deterministic broker unit test and does not require a running RocketMQ cluster.
RocketMQ version
- Branch:
develop - Commit:
a7edeecfb
JDK Version
OpenJDK 17
Describe the Bug
PopConsumerService.transferToFsStore() migrates in-flight POP consumer records from the RocksDB KV store to the FS (revive topic) store when an operator switches the pop consumption implementation back to the filesystem store (AdminBrokerProcessor#transferPopToFsStore). For each record it builds a PopCheckPoint and appends it to the revive topic:
brokerController.getMessageStore().asyncPutMessage(ckMsg).join();
The returned PutMessageResult is discarded, and afterwards the whole scanned batch is removed from the KV store unconditionally:
this.popConsumerStore.deleteRecords(consumerRecords);
When the checkpoint put does not succeed (SERVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE, OS_PAGECACHE_BUSY, CREATE_MAPPED_FILE_FAILED, ...), no checkpoint exists in the FS store, yet the KV record is deleted anyway. The popped-but-not-yet-acked message then has no checkpoint in either store: if the consumer never acks it (client crash, processing failure), nothing will ever revive or re-deliver it - the message is silently lost. Note that store puts are most likely to fail exactly when a broker is degraded, which is precisely when an operator performs this migration, so an entire batch (up to popReviveMaxReturnSizePerRead records) can be dropped in one pass.
Two related consequences in the same method:
- If
asyncPutMessagecompletes exceptionally,join()throws, thecatch (Throwable)block only logs, and thewhile (true)loop rescans the same (still present) records forever inside asynchronizedmethod. The admin request never returns, and any later invocation of the method blocks on the monitor. - The per-batch log line always reports the scanned count as transferred, so even the logs claim records were migrated that were not persisted.
Steps to Reproduce
A deterministic JUnit + Mockito reproduction, mirroring the existing PopConsumerServiceTest#transferToFsStoreTest:
- Build a
PopConsumerServicewith the usual mockedBrokerControllerand start its KV store. - Write one
PopConsumerRecord(e.g. offset 0) into the store. - Stub
messageStore.asyncPutMessage(any())to complete withnew PutMessageResult(PutMessageStatus.SERVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE, null). - Call
consumerService.transferToFsStore(). - Call
popConsumerStore.scanExpiredRecords(0, Long.MAX_VALUE, 10).
Actual: the scan returns 0 records - the record was deleted from the KV store although no checkpoint was ever persisted.
Expected: the record must still be present (1 record), because its checkpoint was not put successfully; it should stay revivable/re-migratable.
Additional Context
PopBufferMergeService#handleCkMessagePutResult and ChangeInvisibleTimeProcessor#appendCheckPointThenAckOrigin already treat only PUT_OK, FLUSH_DISK_TIMEOUT, FLUSH_SLAVE_TIMEOUT and SLAVE_NOT_AVAILABLE as success when appending checkpoints to the revive topic; transferToFsStore should not use a weaker contract than the other checkpoint writers.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Java
- Estrellas
- 22.7k
- Forks
- 12k
- Merge medio
- 3 d 18 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 17
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de apache/rocketmq
-
[Bug] RemotingHelper.connect swaps the socket send and receive buffer configurationPosiblemente ocupada @amalsaidov la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
CompressionType.of fails under the Turkish localePosiblemente ocupada @sharanggupta la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[rocketmq-client-python] TransactionMQProducer allocates an unused producer during initializationAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Bug] notifyMasterOnline aborts the long-polling wake-up with a NullPointerException when an arrival drains a bucket firstPosiblemente ocupada @iloveeyjafjalla la tomó hace 29 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
apache/rocketmq#11441 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Enhancement] FilterFactory duplicate-registration and unregister semantics lack testsPosiblemente ocupada @chennaji9 la tomó hace 34 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
apache/rocketmq#11340 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de apache/rocketmq
Issues similares
-
bug emitter:client:csharp
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
microsoft/typespec#12572 · 1 comentario · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
GCC 15.2: -Wcast-qual warning - cast discards const qualifier from pointer target type (H5trace.c)Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 73/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
needs-area-label
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
area/ai area/backend component/zeebe kind/task
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
spAnser/reacharound#38 ·